Why Kerry Will Crash And Burn In November (GOOD READ!)

Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 3/06/04 | Kyle Williams

[Lady Jag]

I've been found out
Now what do I do?

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Journalism sells one thing above all else--the idea that you need to know "what's going on"--and that you can know that, for free, just by paying attention to them.

Your need to know "what's going on" depends on the idea that "what's going on" at any given moment is important--which contrasts with the idea that the Bible and the Constitution are far more important than any cause celebre', and thus is an inherently anti-conservative concept.

[WOSG]

"Kerry is and was the Democrat who could easily be beat. Yes he is easier to defeat than DEAN. If Dean had not been taken down he could have easily moved to the center. Dean was a better speaker, and had far less political baggage than Kerry."

You are correct, although once Dean screamed, it was clear he too could be made unelectable.

Had Dean kept his mouth in control, he could have had a media makeover ... in fact, they were in the process of that , with the "dont you know he's really not that Liberal" line.

Kerry is the better candidate because Dean shot himself in the foot too much to be able to keep running.

[VadeRetro]

The liberal press will work hard to hide the truth.

They always do that, but they've really got their work cut out with this guy.

[BrucefromMtVernon]

A lot of the people I know disagree with President Bush on economics, but we're sticking with President Bush on account of the democRAT flirtation with the "funny stuff".

[stylin_geek]

Bump.

[bornintexas]

"The liberal press will work hard to hide the truth"

"They always do that, but they've really got their work cut out with this guy."

No truer words were spoken on this entire thread. Look at all the propping up they already had to do. And he is just even with Bush. I really think it's going to be Bush BY A BUNCH. The middle is not really interested in this election. And the ABB crowd doesn't have enough votes to overcome Bush backers. Kerry is tooooooooo negative and people are already sick of him and his pessimistic attitude. This is not what Americans want.
And I don't believe the media when it tells me Americans are not interested in their safety concerning terrorism.
Also, just for funnies, I heard an interesting stat the other day on Brit's show. You have to go back many many many moons to find a close back to back presidential election. Hopefully, God willing and the creek don't rise, history will be good to us.

[VadeRetro]

And the ABB crowd doesn't have enough votes to overcome Bush backers.

There will be a large ABK crowd by the time most of the country learns what we know now. It will take time, but it will happen. Some of this stuff, like the separate peace the VVAW signed in Paris with North Vietnam, cannot be immunized against.

[CGVet58]

tator, you make sense - it's my feeling that if kerry blows up too soon (before the convention), the leftists will write in Hillary as the god-queen on the white stallion coming to save their party.

[RightWhale]

Nader is all 30-year old slogans, so is Kerry. All nine-ten. Maybe even 60s. They already got all they are going to get and they know it. They would do better to run Barbra Streisand/Howard Stern.

[cjmae]

Bill Clinton taught the party well. Just go about your business like nothing is wrong and eventually it will all go away.
This seems to be the donkey philosophy.

[cjmae]

I wish Hillary was on the ticket, then we could get rid of her too.

[Clintonfatigued]

That's an interesting point. Even third-party candidates who poll poorly have swung states from one candidate to another.

In 1976, Eugene McCarthy only polled 1% on election day. But he siphoned enough liberal votes to cost Jimmy Carter Oregon, Maine, Iowa, and perhaps Oklahoma, and narrowed Carter's margin in many other states, very nearly giving Ford the presidency.

In 1980, John Anderson had no effect on the outcome as a whole, and not a great deal on the national margin. But did win enough votes to cost Carter Massachusetts, Arkansas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and perhaps South Carolina and Kentucky.

Maybe Nader can be helpful again this year.

[CommandoFrank]

I think it is very possible that Kerry may be the leftwing equivalent of Bob Dole, but without the charisma and character.

LOL...Great!

[foreverfree]

bump

[ConservativeMan55]

Bump!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

[joesbucks]

Sure, there are folks who are better off than they were 4 years ago. But collectively, are we? Most people aren't. I just received information the other day that our site will be notified soon of closure. I know because it got brought up in a meeting that in reality I shouldn't have been invited to. Approx 100 people sometime this spring or summer. Sadly, it will include my spouse too. Over 100,000 in income gone betweent he two of us. BTW, it (the income)has gone down the past few years with cuts and so forth. And the Sunday paper this morning looks a little bleak.

So are we better off? No. And we are two vs one.

I'll still be voting for GWB. Unlike Reagan after 4 years, we aren't better off, as most people, than 4 years ago.