Posted on 03/01/2004 10:30:56 AM PST by SLB
Not a thing; my point was that what we were told in the article is hearsay. Although, come to think of it, Maier's statement would still be hearsay even if he were available to testify in court, so long as Hodges is also available to testify directly as to what Akbar said to him. At least, as I understand it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.