Kerry Blasts Bush Over Attacks on Record (JOHN F'N KERRY BARF ALERT!!!!)

Drudge Report ^ | Feb 21,2004 | NEDRA PICKLER

[txradioguy]

Wait a minute I'm confused. Kerry shoves it down everyones throat that he served in Vietman. Then he accuses the President of "opening up old wounds"? SOmeone PLEASE explain this to me!!

[My2Cents]

John F-in' Kerry is a whiney little turd.

[MediaMole]

John "Bush was AWOL" Kerry is accusing someone of using his military record against him.

[scarface367]

Ketchup boy wanted to run on his war record. But when his traitorous post-war record gets dragged up, he whines that Bush is doing a dirty campaign. The rats never cease to amaze me.

[BulletBobCo]

Already posted here.

[txradioguy]

What gets me is that Kerry get's upset about the President supposedly using "surrogates" to smear him. Yet F'n Kerry has the entire cnnnbcabccbsnytimes comglomerate to act as HIS surrogate to smear the president 30 times a day over a non-issue. It's incredible what the RATS will do to win back power.

[July 4th]

I read the first few paragraphs of the article and thought my head was going to explode! Has the universe been completely warped 180 degrees?

[July 4th]

Keep in mind, however, that the author - Nedra Pickler - normally does a nice job presenting both sides of the issues.

[My2Cents]

And since when has reporting the truth about a candidate's positions and statements been considered "negative campaigning"?

[bornintexas]

Oh, and this article is just in time for the Sunday Morning No-news shows. You can bet that this will be discussed on all the shows tomorrow about how poor whittle kerry is getting attacked by Bush.

[txradioguy]

"I read the first few paragraphs of the article and thought my head was going to explode!"


That was the EXACT feeling I had. It's like we've been transported into an alternate universe where right and wrong and what's the truth has been strangely twisted.

[onyx]

Kerry is whining now, he'll soon be screamiing foul. His past is coming home to haunt him.

[txradioguy]

"And since when has reporting the truth about a candidate's positions and statements been considered "negative campaigning"?"


When RATS do it to Republicans it's called "exposing the facts on the issues"


When Republicans to it to RATS it's called "negative campaigning"

[Mo1]

Wait a minute I'm confused. Kerry shoves it down everyones throat that he served in Vietman. Then he accuses the President of "opening up old wounds"?

It's an old play out of the Clinton game book ..

[Minn]

I'm also confused. How is criticizing Kerry's nauseatingly dovish senate record dredging up Vietnam, but bringing Cleland to nearly every campaign stop isn’t?

The Dem’s demagoguery knows no bounds. Cleland is indeed their new Florida 2000.

[txradioguy]

The RATS are going to use Max Cleeland as much as they can this year. And they are going to continue to use the lie that Saxby Chambliss questioned Cleeland's "patriotism" when in fact the only issue brought up was the fact that Cleeland voted against homeland security issues. Ann Coulter did a great article on this issue this week.

[teletech]

FINALLY, Kerry on the defensive! It's about time!

[armyboy]

Let me get this straight.
When Kerry brought up President Bush's military record it's a legit. tactic
When a Bush campaign supporter brings up Kerry's militray record, Kerry get's all flustered.
What a F'ing hypocrite

[Use It Or Lose It]

To the Rats, the truth is negative. Hasn't anyone noticed how the Guard story has disappeared from the front pages recently? It's imperative that Kerry's post-service activities and words be kept in the forefront.

Interesting observation heard yesterday: If Kerry receives nomination and selects Edwards, it's theoretically possible any aspirations Hillary has for the White House wouldn't be realized for 16 years (8 Kerry, 8 Edwards). Would she wait that long?