Posted on 02/15/2004 12:49:19 AM PST by Prodigal Son
Not until he stopped for questions at a lunchtime forum in Madison did it become clear that he had taken precautions to shield himself from possible embarrassment. Questions were screened in advance and only supporters on an approved list were called upon to speak. Reporters grimaced as a succession of friendly Wisconsinites lobbed gentle queries about jobs, education and family dairy farmers.Can they do this all the way to November? They're certainly going to try.
'This won't go away. What happened is much nastier than is being reported'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/02/15/wus15.xml&sSheet=/portal/2004/02/15/ixportaltop.htmlStory seems to be big in London. The Hindustani Times and the Australians seem to have it as well.
Can't tell you how funny this looks, seeing the Bush AWOL story slowly evaporate,
http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/17932.htm
while still no sign of what the rest of the world is allowed to know.
Is something going on here?
And THAT shows your lack of understanding of what you support. Here's a little short lesson for you....if someone is a smarmy, dishonest RAT in his personal life with the people he is supposed to love, what makes you think he isn't going to be a smarmy, dishonest RAT with a country full of people he doesn't even know and cares less about? If a man is incapable of making good judgements in his personal affairs (no pun intended), what makes you think he will be capable of making good judgements on behalf of an entire nation? If a man has a history of contempt for the army which he served in, how does that qualify him to be its top commanding officer? If he is sitting idly by while his wife's money is financing America's enemies, what does that make him?
You dumb*ss democRATs better start paying attention. The men you support today will be your slavemasters tomorrow, and if you think they will make a distinction because you once supported them, you'd better think again and take a look at the body count and devasted lives among the Clinton faithful.
Correct. Better for her to jump in late.
http://www.watchblog.com/thirdparty/archives/000780.html
February 06, 2004
Rumor: A Kerry Affair & Push Polling
Rumor has it that John Kerry (D) is going to be outed by Time Magazine next week for having an affair with a 20 year old woman who remains unknown. The affair supposedly took place intermittently right up to Kerry's Fall 2002 announcement of candidacy. At present, this is nothing more than a rumor; and after such sordid tactics as the "push polling" that took place in South Carolina in the 2000 elections, can such rumors be credible during campaign cycles? Could this create a Democratic backlash against Republicans for perceived scandalmongering?
http://www.watchblog.com/ © 2003 - Cameron Barrett | editor@watchblog.com
http://www.camworld.com/archives/001255.html
Not only that, but a blog entry made many days ago 'broke' the story. The blog is run by Cameron Barrett (go to the bottom of the blog (home/main page I Added this to the post cause I couldn't find the name on the first link) to see his name and copyright note). Cameron Barrett works for Wesley Clark's campaign.
And notice how in that blog entry, it already was setting up the right to take the blame?
Could this create a Democratic backlash against Republicans for perceived scandalmongering?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.