[Cowboy Bob]

If States can pass a law allowing Gay marriage, can they also pass a law allowing a Hunting Season?

[Ol' Sparky]

If Roy Moore can be removed for not following the law, this reneged mayor should lose his job for knowingly violating the law. "Civil disobedience" doesn't mean you don't have to pay the price when you violate the law.

[mhking]

The city, under the orders of new liberal Mayor Gavin Newsom, officially married at least 15 gay couples and issued marriage licences to around a dozen others.

The good mayor can "call" it whatever he wants -- that doesn't make it legal. Period.

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

[Andiceman]

Well, if they're going to go with the "two consenting adults" argument, I guess they'll have to issue marriage licenses to incestuous couples. Father & adult daughter want to get hitched? No problem! Twin gay brothers--no problem! Brother & sister want to "keep it in the family"? No problem? Mother & son--make being "Mama's special boy" an official union.

Why not? If both parties are consenting adults, and traditional morality doesn't apply anymore, they shouldn't have a problem with it.

[SirAllen]

Instead of calling couples "bride" and "groom", the wedding licence application listed lesbian couples as "1st applicant" and "2nd applicant."

What's stopping them from adding a 3rd and 4th applicant?

[Loyalist]

The US city of San Francisco has become the first civil authority in the United States to officially marry gay couples in open defiance of laws banning the practice.

The law does not ban homosexual 'marriage' anymore than the laws of gravity and aerodynamics ban me from flapping my arms up and down and flying through the air.

Natural law, and the laws of physics, are not arbitrary; they just are.

The law simply reflects what already exists in natural law. The state cannot change the natural law definition of marriage--it can only misapply the term to homosexual partnerships.