Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Local (Key West) gay couple to challenge marriage law
Key West Citizen & Bait Wrapper ^ | February 13, 2004 | Mandy Bolen

Posted on 02/13/2004 1:57:08 AM PST by Elle Bee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: weegee
I think Santorum was mocked for claiming that the slippery slope led to man-on-dog sex.
21 posted on 02/13/2004 2:39:19 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
FL abolished common law marriage in 1974. There is a legal niche for cohabitation agreements, particularly in the southbeach area. The occur generally when homosexuals buy a house "together".

You are absolutly right. However, (there is always one) the homosexuals are framing this debate based on "feeeeeelings". They are saying marriage is about sanctifying the person you love or is for when two people looooove each other.

The set standard of marriage of 1. age of consent 2. not closer than first cousin 3. one man one woman (father mother breeding/child raisig pair) 4 not married to another. By adopting only feeeeeeeeelings then all those are out the window. Homosexuals are just the useful tools (ala hitler's socialists) to disrupt the family and institute their ALI Model Code on Domestic relations.

If you oppose homosexual marriage you are against love goes the argument. What do children have to do with love goes the argument. Homosexual marriage is like interacial marriage the argument goes. It is all about feeeeeelings. There is no right, there is no wrong, there is no personal responsibility for our behaviors. (as long as it feeeeeels good.)
22 posted on 02/13/2004 2:45:32 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
He was mocked for suggesting everything from same sex marriage to polygamy (both of which have already come up for legal challenges).
23 posted on 02/13/2004 3:06:39 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The truth of the matter is that homosexual couple don't want to be "living in sin" in the eyes of their families and God; that is why they want to be married.

Unfortunately they forget that sodomites get their name from the tale of Sodom and Gomorrah.

24 posted on 02/13/2004 3:08:27 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Imagine how much money is going to be spent on this issue.

Yes, just as they fought the sodomy statutes in the judicial arena rather than the legislative arena. Let the taxpayer pick up the tab fighting it.

25 posted on 02/13/2004 3:10:21 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
Why should gays not be allowed to get married? Meaning - what complications are created for the government (I understand the societal concerns).
26 posted on 02/13/2004 3:12:22 PM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weegee
People really fixated on the man-on-dog comment, though. If he'd just talked about polygamy or same-sex marriage the usual suspects would have complained but the story would have died over the weekend.
27 posted on 02/13/2004 3:13:35 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
What Santorum Really Said

His most horrifying observations were these: "And if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [homosexual] sex in your home, you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery." Furthermore: "Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: Society is based on the future of that society."

28 posted on 02/13/2004 3:13:59 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: weegee
I wish they wouldn't use the word "church" to describe abominations like the Metropolitan Community Sodomite Association." Why not just "First Sodomite Assembly," or "First Synagogue of Satan," or "Sons of Sodom/ Daughters of Sappho Lodge" etc.

"Church" ought to be reserved for Christian assemblies.
29 posted on 02/13/2004 3:13:59 PM PST by Chris Talk (What Earth now is, Mars once was. What Mars now is, Earth will become.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: weegee
I remember when the AP released the total transcript of the interview. I do not doubt that his comments can be edited down to a concise, articulate defense of traditional marriage, but that is not all he said.
30 posted on 02/13/2004 3:15:07 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: weegee
In Defense of Rick Santorum: His Own Words

Transcript of interview.

31 posted on 02/13/2004 3:20:02 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
He DID not get all of that flak over the dog comment. You can go through all of the old threads and very that fact.
32 posted on 02/13/2004 3:24:45 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: G2R
all of nthose 'rights' you've enumerated are already available

If your real agenda on the eve of St. Valentine's Day is to re-define the definition of marriage ....... then amend the Constitution

I think you are brighter than to believe what you have posted

.

33 posted on 02/13/2004 7:39:12 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
You're quite correct

it's all about the ability to be declaired a protected class

then they can litigate under Title

it's silly ...... but they like to play victim

34 posted on 02/13/2004 7:44:17 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson