'Senator Kerry would seek direct talks with Iran'

John F'n Kerry, the French-looking appeaser, wants to legitimize an evil regime that is about to collapse, much like his bid for the presidency.

21 posted on 02/07/2004 4:30:43 AM PST by PGalt

Can't the new president fire all former administration employees? And if so, I wonder why President Bush didn't just fire all these Clinton troublemakers when he took office.

22 posted on 02/07/2004 4:34:43 AM PST by beckysueb (Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)

Apparently. The Mullahs that are hosting the party for international terrorists would surely be receptive to our requests.

23 posted on 02/07/2004 4:35:12 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))

perhaps, he is getting support, money and other aids from them? Who knows?

24 posted on 02/07/2004 4:36:28 AM PST by F14 Pilot ("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")

I see Kerry's still channelling Neville Chamberlain.

25 posted on 02/07/2004 4:36:36 AM PST by mewzilla

Bumper sticker:

Bush or Kerry: Which one would the mullahs vote for?

26 posted on 02/07/2004 4:37:55 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas

I love your tagline!

27 posted on 02/07/2004 4:39:04 AM PST by beckysueb (Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)

Well let's put him on his former boat he used in Vietnam and send him on his way.

28 posted on 02/07/2004 4:39:39 AM PST by Just mythoughts

John Kerry will seek direct talks with Iran if he wins the White House
=
Back to the good old days of Carter and Clinton

29 posted on 02/07/2004 4:39:43 AM PST by DoctorMichael (Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)

I was thinking the same thing. Given this article he may be pandering for money from friends of our enemies, enemies of freedom.

30 posted on 02/07/2004 4:42:19 AM PST by PGalt

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

They'll vote for Kerry, for sure.

31 posted on 02/07/2004 4:42:59 AM PST by F14 Pilot ("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")

32 posted on 02/07/2004 4:44:28 AM PST by MEG33 (BUSH/CHENEY '04)

33 posted on 02/07/2004 4:46:44 AM PST by mewzilla

UNILATERAL TALKS, without the UN.........

Horrors!

34 posted on 02/07/2004 4:51:29 AM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)

35 posted on 02/07/2004 4:51:29 AM PST by F14 Pilot ("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")

This is the original piece of News from the IRNA News Agency --- Pilot

Senator Kerry would seek direct talks with Iran: adviser

IRNA
6 Feb 2004

Washington, Feb 6, IRNA -- Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry
will seek direct talks with Iran if he wins the White House, his
foreign policy chief said Thursday.
Rand Beers, national security issues coordinator for the
Massachusetts senator, was critical of President George W. Bush for
shunning direct dialogue with Iran after branding it a member of an
"axis of evil," dispatches indicated.
Speaking to a foreign policy forum, Beers said the question of
nuclear non-proliferation was one of the most significant issues
facing the world and Washington should press harder to advance
negotiations.
Beers said Kerry, currently leading the pack in the race for the
Democratic presidential nomination, sought more direct efforts to thaw
relations with Iran that have been frozen since the 1979 Islamic
Revolution.
"John Kerry is not saying that he is looking for better relations
with Iran. He is looking for a dialogue with Iran," Beers said. "There
are some issues on which we really need to sit down with the
Iranians."
He listed the cultivation of opium poppies in neighboring
Afghanistan, terrorism and nuclear non-proliferation as among the
questions Kerry would like to take up directly with Tehran.
"It`s a realistic sitting down and having the kinds of discussions
that we`re just not having because this administration is so tied in
its own ideological views of Iran and waiting for the Iranian regime
to collapse."
He said Kerry would want to work with a "broad range of countries"
to stem the traffic in materials that could fall into the wrong hands
and help make nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.
"We`re going to have look at international (non-proliferation)
regimes that currently exist and probably go through some revisions of
those regimes in order to find a way to approach and address these
problems," Beers said.

http://www.irna.ir/?LANG=EN&PART=_HOME&TYPE=HP#2004_02_0618_59_176

36 posted on 02/07/2004 4:54:54 AM PST by F14 Pilot ("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")

Well, Kerry's got the Islamist vote locked up. Wonder if he's taking their money, too..?

37 posted on 02/07/2004 4:56:17 AM PST by mewzilla

Considering that Kerry took campaign money from a lobbyist for the Iraqi Baathist regime...I think you are correct.

38 posted on 02/07/2004 4:57:48 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)

"It`s a realistic sitting down and having the kinds of discussions that we`re just not having because this administration is so tied in its own ideological views of Iran and waiting for the Iranian regime to collapse."

Ideological views of Iran?

"We`re going to have look at international (non-proliferation) regimes that currently exist and probably go through some revisions of those regimes in order to find a way to approach and address"

Go thru revisions of regimes?

What the heck is he talking about?

39 posted on 02/07/2004 5:06:28 AM PST by nuconvert ("Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else?")

Why not??? He is happy with the helps from the Mullahs.
I am sure he is getting money or different kinds of support from them and he made them sure about their safety.

40 posted on 02/07/2004 5:08:53 AM PST by F14 Pilot ("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794