Skip to comments.
Democrats Dissatisfied by Bush's Iraq Intelligence Commission
TBO.com ^
| 2/07/04
| Ken Guggenheim
Posted on 02/06/2004 11:56:00 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
02/06/2004 11:56:00 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Of course they are.
To: kattracks
Pubbies probably aren't either cause their favorite Arab American George Mitchell (family from Lebanon) isn't heading it.
3
posted on
02/07/2004 12:00:27 AM PST
by
dts32041
(Will Kerry ever call his wife an African American?)
To: COEXERJ145
And .. we should care about their disappointment because .......???
Well .. THE DEMOCRATS ARE A DISAPPOINTMENT TO ME!!
4
posted on
02/07/2004 12:01:18 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: kattracks
In the coarse nature of politics and the coarse nature of people in politics it is the task of both sides to start arguments with with the other side under any pretext.
5
posted on
02/07/2004 12:12:34 AM PST
by
RLK
To: RLK
If McCain doesn't allow the commission to be used in a partisan manner against President bush, will he change from a media darling to a media goat?
To: COEXERJ145
You never win
by giving in.
Learn that W,
your father did not.
7
posted on
02/07/2004 12:31:51 AM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: kattracks
Yes a truly independent enquiry should consist of Saddam as chairman ..sorry chairperson, with an assorted array of democrats, anti-war psychopaths and representatives from other terrorist organisations. The enquiry should be conducted in French and in order to diversify it should consist of at least one homosexual, a lesbian, a paedophile, an abortionist and a man who has a fetish for livestock! - They should consult Hans Blix and report back to the UN.
To: kattracks
What a surprise. The Democrats wouldn't be satisfied if Bush announced that he'd deliberately lied about everything in order to start an evil war with poor innocent Saddam, and he felt so guilty about it, he would now commit suicide with a fish knife. They'd complain that the knife wasn't rusty enough. Ska-roo them.
9
posted on
02/07/2004 12:42:25 AM PST
by
HHFi
To: HHFi
Ska-roo them. You said all that had to be said right there, FRiend.
10
posted on
02/07/2004 12:46:19 AM PST
by
clee1
(Where's the beef???)
To: kattracks
The Democrats realize that the truth is that any intelligence failures will lead straight back to the Clinton administration.
I figure that Bush met with Tenet before he gave his speech at Georgetown and Tenet assured him that he would lead any investigative commission to the truth about the Clinton administration's foreign policy failures. So Bush said go for it. Now the Democrats are running scared. Boo hoo. Someone should have told them to be careful what you ask for, President Bush is not Orrin Hatch.
11
posted on
02/07/2004 12:50:05 AM PST
by
Eva
To: HHFi
"Ska-roo them"
You are correct, sir! When is W going to learn that there is nothing that will please the Dems??? When they lost the election, they vowed to block him at every turn and MAKE HIS LIFE MISERABLE!! When he realizes that by catering to them, he is losing their respect as well as ours!! I wish he would just tell them that their PMS is harming this country and to SHUT THE HELL UP!!
12
posted on
02/07/2004 12:56:36 AM PST
by
whadizit
To: kattracks
They Democrats want this investigation in order to provide a spring board from which they intend to bounce off more lies. Even their new hero David Kay said that there was no manipulation of intelligence. It doesn't matter to the Democrats that there is no evidence to support their wacky claims - facts seldom play a part in their rants. Their intent is clear. They hope to convince as many people as possible that the President lied, manipulated, strong armed, and intimidated intelligence gatherers. They're disgusting.
13
posted on
02/07/2004 1:19:04 AM PST
by
Jaysun
(There is no rejection in life quite like a canceled shrink appointment.)
To: kattracks
Democratic senator, Evan Bayh of Indiana, said the panel "seems to me to be a very credible group of people,
Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, praised the selections of Robb and McCain.Chuck Robb, co-chair.
LBJ's son in law. Had parties with coke whores while govenor at Va Beach on the weekends.
Got "massages" whiled naked from former Miss Virginia.
Clinton loving left wing voting senator, defeated finally in 2000.
14
posted on
02/07/2004 2:13:10 AM PST
by
xyz123
(Mama always said "A RINO is as a RINO does.")
To: kattracks
Lloyd Cutler! This guy is sooo covered with Carter's crap its disgusting. He's deep into the
overthrow of the Shah of Iran, buddies with Ramsey Clark and Ralph Nader.
Lloyd Cutler social network
To: kattracks
If Bush came up with a cure for cancer the Demorats would complain about the loss of jobs to lab rats.
16
posted on
02/07/2004 3:54:37 AM PST
by
CIBGUY
(CIBGUY)
To: CIBGUY
Thats absolutely true. In a comment by a poster in moveon.org, Rush said it was said, "I don't care if Bush found a cure for cancer. I would still hate him." Their hatred knows no bounds. Sick!!
17
posted on
02/07/2004 3:58:19 AM PST
by
beckysueb
(Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
To: CIBGUY
Professional courtesy.
18
posted on
02/07/2004 4:29:43 AM PST
by
sd-joe
To: kattracks
Co-chairing the panel with Robb will be retired judge federal appeals Laurence Silberman, a Republican. Robb, son-in-law of the late President Lyndon Johnson, has been practicing law since leaving the Senate in 2001. Silberman, who served as deputy attorney general in the Nixon and Ford administrations, was named to the appeals court by President Reagan in 1985. Bush also named to the panel: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.; Lloyd Cutler, former White House counsel to Presidents Carter and Clinton; former federal judge Patricia M. Wald; Yale University president Richard C. Levin; and retired Adm. William O. Studeman, former deputy director of the CIA.
I never get picked to be on the team.
19
posted on
02/07/2004 4:30:35 AM PST
by
BigWaveBetty
(Won't you please, won't you please, please won't you be my neighbor?)
To: kattracks
I'm pretty dissatisfied with Democrats' intelligence.
20
posted on
02/07/2004 4:36:10 AM PST
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson