Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC's Powell 'Outraged' by 'Deplorable' Halftime Stunt
Newsmax ^ | 2/1/04

Posted on 02/02/2004 8:49:47 AM PST by truthandlife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 last
To: ClintonBeGone; PattonReincarnated
Thats exactly what I'm saying. Take responsibility for your viewing and change the channel.

Then you are a complete frickin' moron. The thought broadcast networks should not be held responsible for their content is patently silly.

Free speech is absolute? Poppycock. Do a Google search on Miller v California and read up so you can wash that stupidity out of your brain.

When you have brought yourself up to speed you can come back here and rejoin the thinking crowd. Until then, go hang with those more of your intellectual level, like at DU.

161 posted on 02/02/2004 6:10:17 PM PST by Houmatt (Where is Lurker No More?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated
The only way ClintonBeGone could possibly agree with you is by either not reading or comprehending what you said, which I got loud and clear.
162 posted on 02/02/2004 6:12:55 PM PST by Houmatt (Where is Lurker No More?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
The thought broadcast networks should not be held responsible for their content is patently silly.

That may be your thought, but its not mine. The public will hold CBS responsible. But the question is when are you going to start being responsible for your own choices.

163 posted on 02/02/2004 6:13:01 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Do a Google search on Miller v California and read up so you can wash that stupidity out of your brain.

Hey hair brain, Miller v California was about pornography. There was nothing about last night's performance that was pornographic. It's really about time you start taking responsibility for your own actions or lack there of, instead of running to the nanny state to protect you. I presume you're male. Stop acting like a sissyman.

164 posted on 02/02/2004 6:16:48 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
That may be your thought, but its not mine.

And what you said in #151 and #158 makes you a baldfaced liar as well as a CFM.

Go ahead. Keep digging. I will even give you extra tools if you'd like.

165 posted on 02/02/2004 6:18:05 PM PST by Houmatt (Where is Lurker No More?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Hey hair brain, Miller v California was about pornography.

(chuckle)

(snicker)

Like I said, do a Google search and read up.

166 posted on 02/02/2004 6:20:05 PM PST by Houmatt (Where is Lurker No More?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Why don't you just tell us when you're going to stand up and be a man and stop running to the nanny state to change your TV channels.
167 posted on 02/02/2004 6:22:19 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Come on. No slack for a girly man.
168 posted on 02/02/2004 6:22:59 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
I'm laughing at your superior intellect.
169 posted on 02/02/2004 6:27:00 PM PST by Houmatt (Where is Lurker No More?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
It's not difficult given the opponent.
170 posted on 02/02/2004 6:27:35 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Thanks for agreeing with me.
171 posted on 02/02/2004 6:42:19 PM PST by Houmatt (Where is Lurker No More?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Thanks for agreeing with me.

Ah, its all in good fun. :) But seriously dude, don't you have the least bit of shame and embarrassment that instead of protecting your family like a man you want to run crying to some bureaucrat in Washington DC to do the job for you? How could the wife of such a man look at him in the morning?

172 posted on 02/02/2004 6:50:39 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
Thanks for the ping!
173 posted on 02/02/2004 8:15:30 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson