Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Unveils Plan to Restrain Spending
Talon News / GOP USA ^ | Feb. 2, 2004 | Jeff Gannon

Posted on 02/02/2004 7:44:58 AM PST by prairiebreeze

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Mulder
But now we have flush toilets.
21 posted on 02/02/2004 9:00:08 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Don't have a clue how I accomplished this.  Computer nimble ......definitely not!

 

Comparison of Bush Budget (FY’04) with Past Budget Averages

 
FY’04
Proposal
Post-WWII
Average
(FY’46 - FY’02)
Clinton
Budgets
(FY’94 – FY’01)
G.H.W. Bush
Budgets
(FY’90 - FY’93)
Reagan
Budgets
(FY’82 - FY’89)
Total Receipts as percent of GDP
17.0%
17.9%
19.4%
17.7%
18.0%
Total outlays as percent of GDP
19.7%
19.5%
19.6%
22.0%
22.3%
Deficit (-)/Surplus as percent of GDP
-2.7%
-1.6%
-0.1%
-4.3%
-4.3%
Annual growth in total receipts (average % change from previous fiscal year, FY96 $)
2.7%
2.9%
4.9%
0.5%
2.5%
Annual growth in total outlays (average % change from previous fiscal year, FY96 $)
2.2%
2.3%
1.5%
1.9%
2.7%
Defense spending as a percent of total outlays
17.5%
35.5%
17.1%
21.7%
26.7%
Non-defense discretionary spending as a percent of total outlays
19.2%
19.4%*
17.6%
16.6%
17.1%
Net interest costs as percent of total outlays
7.9%
10.5%*
13.9%
14.5%
13.2%
Other mandatory spending as a percent of total outlays
55.4%
41.6%*
51.4%
46.2%
42.9%
Debt held by public at end of fiscal year as percent of GDP
36.9%
44.0%
43.0%
46.3%
36.7%
Gross Debt at end of fiscal year as percentof GDP
64.8%
56.2%
63.4%
61.8%
45.4%
* includes only data back to 1962 since the distinction between discretionary and mandatory began only in that year.

22 posted on 02/02/2004 9:15:17 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: windchime
Thank YOU so much for posting this! How informative and how necessary.
23 posted on 02/02/2004 9:44:16 AM PST by alwaysconservative (Democrats recycle: bad ideas, bad policies, bad people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
bump for later read
24 posted on 02/02/2004 9:56:22 AM PST by TruthConquers ("Who will liberate us from these tyrants of secularist tolerance?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
You big whiner. NOT FREE? Compared to what? Heaven?
25 posted on 02/02/2004 10:28:38 AM PST by akbaines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: windchime
You're super!! Thanks

Prairie
26 posted on 02/02/2004 11:03:38 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Spending OPM (Other People's Money) is W's new Alcohol Substitute. What a Buzz!
27 posted on 02/02/2004 11:07:22 AM PST by searchandrecovery (America - The NEW Third World!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cold_duck
Interesting to note that non-discretionary spending has risen 23% over the past 4 years, though....

Yeah, but Our Rulers can't do anything about non-discretionary spending. It's non-discretionary. Not their problem. God and the Martians are forcing them to squander that money. Nothing they can do.

Sorry.

28 posted on 02/02/2004 11:09:39 AM PST by Hank Rearden (Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: searchandrecovery
Ridiculous comment.
29 posted on 02/02/2004 11:15:25 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Bush Unveils Plan to Restrain Spending....................


You've got to hand it to this guy, what a politician!

Uses his leadership to create the biggest one term spending increase in history, then once the baseline is in place, call for restraint.

As politicians go, this guy has few peers.
30 posted on 02/02/2004 11:22:32 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
"...... this guy has few peers."


You could have begun and ended with that portion of your statement.

Seems to some that:

A President doing ALL aspects of his job = Much to attack
31 posted on 02/02/2004 11:34:52 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Kerry's ahead in the polls. Cut Bush slack and let him make the case.

32 posted on 02/02/2004 11:38:31 AM PST by WOSG (I don't want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
You neglect to mention we've had a war on and 9/11 happened.


33 posted on 02/02/2004 11:42:15 AM PST by WOSG (I don't want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: searchandrecovery
Aren't ALL Presidents required to present a budget proposal? Wonder what the budgets of previous president(s) might have been substitutes for.
34 posted on 02/02/2004 11:43:22 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative; prairiebreeze
You're welcome! Informative, isn't it.
35 posted on 02/02/2004 11:45:16 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: windchime
Thanks for posting this....

This really punctures the balloon that Bush has taken us in some different extreme direction... Govt spending under Bush is smaller than it was under Reagan.

I know this much: The only opportunity we will have to really transform and reduce Government spending will be under a unified Republican administration and Congress.

36 posted on 02/02/2004 11:48:47 AM PST by WOSG (I don't want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
"I know this much: The only opportunity we will have to really transform and reduce Government spending will be under a unified Republican administration and Congress."

I was just reading your other comments. You are so right in all of them!
37 posted on 02/02/2004 11:52:43 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: windchime
That chart conveniently left off the averages for Bush's budgets.

I'll try to figure them out and post.

And I think as time goes on % of GDP may not be the best way to judge budget spending. The GDP is growing at a faster rate than I would want the Government to.
38 posted on 02/02/2004 11:59:33 AM PST by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
[The President] said, "One of the things we've shown the American people is we understand how the economy works. The economy doesn't work by growing government; the economy works by growing people's wallets so they can spend, save or invest."

< -snip- >

He began by saying, "One clear signal we need to send to the American people and the markets is we're going to be wise when it comes to the expenditure of the people's money."

Conservatives have been grumbling about the explosive growth in spending by the Bush administration. Their discontent was exacerbated last week when a new estimate for the prescription drug benefit Bush personally lobbied Congress for might cost $535 billion instead of $400 billion

But, but...

Prescription Drug price tag Triples in just Three Years


39 posted on 02/02/2004 12:05:20 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: searchandrecovery




Spending OPM (Other People's Money) is W's new Alcohol Substitute. What a Buzz!

Cheap shot about the alcohol.

The case against the President's overspending is better off without it.


40 posted on 02/02/2004 12:12:46 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson