Skip to comments.
Bush Unveils Plan to Restrain Spending
Talon News / GOP USA ^
| Feb. 2, 2004
| Jeff Gannon
Posted on 02/02/2004 7:44:58 AM PST by prairiebreeze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Mulder
But now we have flush toilets.
21
posted on
02/02/2004 9:00:08 AM PST
by
altura
To: prairiebreeze
Don't have a clue how I accomplished this. Computer nimble ......definitely not!
Comparison of Bush Budget (FY04) with Past Budget Averages
|
FY04 Proposal
|
Post-WWII Average (FY46 - FY02)
|
Clinton Budgets (FY94 FY01)
|
G.H.W. Bush Budgets (FY90 - FY93)
|
Reagan Budgets (FY82 - FY89)
|
Total Receipts as percent of GDP |
17.0%
|
17.9%
|
19.4%
|
17.7%
|
18.0%
|
Total outlays as percent of GDP |
19.7%
|
19.5%
|
19.6%
|
22.0%
|
22.3%
|
Deficit (-)/Surplus as percent of GDP |
-2.7%
|
-1.6%
|
-0.1%
|
-4.3%
|
-4.3%
|
Annual growth in total receipts (average % change from previous fiscal year, FY96 $) |
2.7%
|
2.9%
|
4.9%
|
0.5%
|
2.5%
|
Annual growth in total outlays (average % change from previous fiscal year, FY96 $) |
2.2%
|
2.3%
|
1.5%
|
1.9%
|
2.7%
|
Defense spending as a percent of total outlays |
17.5%
|
35.5%
|
17.1%
|
21.7%
|
26.7%
|
Non-defense discretionary spending as a percent of total outlays |
19.2%
|
19.4%*
|
17.6%
|
16.6%
|
17.1%
|
Net interest costs as percent of total outlays |
7.9%
|
10.5%*
|
13.9%
|
14.5%
|
13.2%
|
Other mandatory spending as a percent of total outlays |
55.4%
|
41.6%*
|
51.4%
|
46.2%
|
42.9%
|
Debt held by public at end of fiscal year as percent of GDP |
36.9%
|
44.0%
|
43.0%
|
46.3%
|
36.7%
|
Gross Debt at end of fiscal year as percentof GDP |
64.8%
|
56.2%
|
63.4%
|
61.8%
|
45.4%
|
* includes only data back to 1962 since the distinction between discretionary and mandatory began only in that year. |
22
posted on
02/02/2004 9:15:17 AM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: windchime
Thank YOU so much for posting this! How informative and how necessary.
23
posted on
02/02/2004 9:44:16 AM PST
by
alwaysconservative
(Democrats recycle: bad ideas, bad policies, bad people.)
To: prairiebreeze
bump for later read
24
posted on
02/02/2004 9:56:22 AM PST
by
TruthConquers
("Who will liberate us from these tyrants of secularist tolerance?")
To: Mulder
You big whiner. NOT FREE? Compared to what? Heaven?
25
posted on
02/02/2004 10:28:38 AM PST
by
akbaines
To: windchime
You're super!! Thanks
Prairie
26
posted on
02/02/2004 11:03:38 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: prairiebreeze
Spending OPM (Other People's Money) is W's new Alcohol Substitute. What a Buzz!
To: cold_duck
Interesting to note that non-discretionary spending has risen 23% over the past 4 years, though.... Yeah, but Our Rulers can't do anything about non-discretionary spending. It's non-discretionary. Not their problem. God and the Martians are forcing them to squander that money. Nothing they can do.
Sorry.
28
posted on
02/02/2004 11:09:39 AM PST
by
Hank Rearden
(Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
To: searchandrecovery
Ridiculous comment.
29
posted on
02/02/2004 11:15:25 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: prairiebreeze
Bush Unveils Plan to Restrain Spending....................
You've got to hand it to this guy, what a politician!
Uses his leadership to create the biggest one term spending increase in history, then once the baseline is in place, call for restraint.
As politicians go, this guy has few peers.
30
posted on
02/02/2004 11:22:32 AM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
To: WhiteGuy
"...... this guy has few peers."
You could have begun and ended with that portion of your statement.
Seems to some that:
A President doing ALL aspects of his job = Much to attack
31
posted on
02/02/2004 11:34:52 AM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: KantianBurke
Kerry's ahead in the polls. Cut Bush slack and let him make the case.
32
posted on
02/02/2004 11:38:31 AM PST
by
WOSG
(I don't want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
To: WhiteGuy
You neglect to mention we've had a war on and 9/11 happened.
33
posted on
02/02/2004 11:42:15 AM PST
by
WOSG
(I don't want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
To: searchandrecovery
Aren't ALL Presidents required to present a budget proposal? Wonder what the budgets of previous president(s) might have been substitutes for.
34
posted on
02/02/2004 11:43:22 AM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: alwaysconservative; prairiebreeze
You're welcome! Informative, isn't it.
35
posted on
02/02/2004 11:45:16 AM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: windchime
Thanks for posting this....
This really punctures the balloon that Bush has taken us in some different extreme direction... Govt spending under Bush is smaller than it was under Reagan.
I know this much: The only opportunity we will have to really transform and reduce Government spending will be under a unified Republican administration and Congress.
36
posted on
02/02/2004 11:48:47 AM PST
by
WOSG
(I don't want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
To: WOSG
"I know this much: The only opportunity we will have to really transform and reduce Government spending will be under a unified Republican administration and Congress."
I was just reading your other comments. You are so right in all of them!
37
posted on
02/02/2004 11:52:43 AM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: windchime
That chart conveniently left off the averages for Bush's budgets.
I'll try to figure them out and post.
And I think as time goes on % of GDP may not be the best way to judge budget spending. The GDP is growing at a faster rate than I would want the Government to.
To: prairiebreeze
[The President] said, "One of the things we've shown the American people is we understand how the economy works. The economy doesn't work by growing government; the economy works by growing people's wallets so they can spend, save or invest." < -snip- > He began by saying, "One clear signal we need to send to the American people and the markets is we're going to be wise when it comes to the expenditure of the people's money." Conservatives have been grumbling about the explosive growth in spending by the Bush administration. Their discontent was exacerbated last week when a new estimate for the prescription drug benefit Bush personally lobbied Congress for might cost $535 billion instead of $400 billion
But, but... Prescription Drug price tag Triples in just Three Years
|
39
posted on
02/02/2004 12:05:20 PM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
To: searchandrecovery
Spending OPM (Other People's Money) is W's new Alcohol Substitute. What a Buzz!
Cheap shot about the alcohol. The case against the President's overspending is better off without it.
|
40
posted on
02/02/2004 12:12:46 PM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson