Write AGAINST George Soros Sunday!!! (PLEASE click here!)

2-01-04

[visualops]

While Soros can spend his money any way he wants, and he may be basking in the adulation of liberal brown-nosers nationwide, he may find the publicity will not earn the Democrats the votes they want. This sort of activism preaches to the choir only- most Americans do not like folks they deem are not playing fair, and nobody likes a showoff.

Soros's contributions are filling a gap in Democratic Party finances that opened after the restrictions in the 2002 McCain-Feingold law took effect. In the past, political parties paid a large share of television and get-out-the-vote costs with unregulated "soft money" contributions from corporations, unions and rich individuals. The parties are now barred from accepting such money. But non-party groups in both camps are stepping in, accepting soft money and taking over voter mobilization.

"It's incredibly ironic that George Soros is trying to create a more open society by using an unregulated, under-the-radar-screen, shadowy, soft-money group to do it," Republican National Committee spokeswoman Christine Iverson said. "George Soros has purchased the Democratic Party."

[staytrue]

Soros can not pull this off by himself and I doubt anyone else will join him.

More likely is that other currency traders would say, "sure george, I'm with you" and then they would start to support him and when his money comes in, they would reverse and bury him.

Whether they like him or not, the currency traders would bankrupt their own mother for a million or two and they will do it to soros if they can.

Soros knows this too and he won't try an October surprise. He may be the head barracuda, but he knows the other barracuda's all too well.

[TruthNtegrity]

I seriously doubt 7 billion could disrupt the economy to any extent which would be noticeable.

This shows that you know nothing about Soros.

He is an incredible manipulator of currency and can cause governments to fall. I don't know if he's got enough money to hurt America but his ability to bet against the Pound for example, cost Brits millions. One could ask them what they think of Soros. I'll make it easy for you. They hate him.

Or how about the Kazakastans? He promised them help with getting their infrastructure going and then decided he didn't want to do it. He let them falter and then fall on their collective noses. I'd be willing to bet a hundred large that he took the downside in stride because he had a bet riding on it.

Since his favorite game is currency manipulation, do not bet against him having as much liquidity as it takes to do whatever he is thinking about doing.

He also has men who used to work with him who if they decided to "work" with him, can put their millions to work in the same direction as Soros. One of these that comes quickly to mind is Jimmy Rogers. He used to work for Soros, but quit to go out on his own (after making millions) since he decided he could do it better and didn't want to make money for other people anymore; he simply wanted to make more money for himself. He is proof that someone can never have enough money. You'd think with his millions, he could relax, take up a hobby, do some volunteer work, but he is in fact addicted to "working it" - making more money in foreign stock exchanges, commodities or anything he decides is a way to make MORE money.

That's just one who might help Soros. There are others.

In the aggregate, their qabillions would be a formidable challenge to any market, any commodity that they decided to effect. I don't know what the "plan" is, but I've learned that Soros can rig the game in his favor, and that is a contrary bet you don't want to take.

[TruthNtegrity]

While I think Soros is a lunatic and would have no problem writing letters about him, it seems to me we on the right have to be careful we don't fall into the Liberal trap of trying to stop free speech when we don't like it.

Stopping free speech?

Oh, give me a break.

We have as much right to talk about stopping Soros as he does to keep publicizing his intention of bringing down the President.

In fact, due to this wanting to unseat a sitting President and the fact that he may try something tricky before the election, I say we have more right than he does!

Okay, maybe not. But we certainly have an equal right to his.

Free speech is free speech, whether it's his or mine or yours.

[jmstein7]

Thus, the proper response is to call him out on it ahead of time, making sure that he gets the "credit" for his actions.

[roses of sharon]

Soros vowed to burst "the bubble of American Supremacy".

He should be destroyed.

[TruthNtegrity]

Exactly.

I intend to write letters and write them frequently!

[jmstein7]

And in destroying, we need use only words.

Sometimes, the word is mightier than the dollar.

If the word about Soros gets out and people also know that he is in bed with the Democrats, he could spend a *trillion* dollars and not make a difference.

[jmstein7]

Excellent -- and make sure your friends and family -- and thier friends and family -- do the same.

We should start a chain email as well. Maybe even a website dedicated to the issue.

[BrucefromMtVernon]

It comes as no amazement that the lapdog newsmedia refuses to expose Sauros (sic) as a major drugpusher. He's pushing for the democrats because he believes they'll back down in the war against Dope, Inc.

[olliemb]

Agree with you. Personally looking forward to see a fool separated from his money.

[jmstein7]

BUMP!

[Grenada]

self bump.

[Brad’s Gramma]

bttt!

[CyberAnt]

Well .. I agree with part of what you say, but I have a personal example which might change your mind.

Remember the "imminent threat" that was constantly used by the dims against Bush ..?? Well .. I knew Bush didn't say that, and I knew the exact portion of the speech where the words appeared. So .. I began an email campaign to get this "imminent threat" debunked.

After several weeks of sending email and not having any success, I finally sent an email to every Fox email address they had .. the very same message to all. That weekend, Tony Snow had John Rockerfeller on his show. When Tony asked John about the "imminent threat", John said that yes, that was what the President said.

Well .. up on the screen comes the SOUS and the actual statement the President made: "some have said that we should not act until the threat is imminent". John looked like a deer caught in the headlights .. then Tony hit John with his own words. Up on the screen was John's statement using the words "imminent threat". It wasn't the President who said it, it was John Rockerfeller who said it.

Guess what .. almost immediately that slam against the President was dead! Why! Because I hounded the media until they had to look into it. And .. I must say Tony did an outstanding job for which I thanked him. And .. I'm very confident I was not the only person writing about this issue.

However, having worked in radio, I can tell you that for every letter or email a media outlet receives, that one letter demographically represents hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands. For us to write these letter to the listed media outlets .. it will cause those outlets to investigate and perhaps put out some warning signals to Soros that we know what he's is up to and he better not try it. At the very least, it will put the info out there and if Soros should try anything, Bush will not be forced to take the blame.

[Travelgirl]

Thank you for your efforts. Keep up the good work.

[n-tres-ted]

I think this thread has the wrong slant on Soros' game plan. If his plan is to wreck the economy as a way to defeat GWB's reelection, he would not have surfaced in the political arena to announce his hatred of the president. He would have kept his political objective secret, wrecked the economy and could not have been tied to such an objective because he had no known motive.

Instead, he announced his political views (so-called) as a means to make his motives sound political when they are really business motives. He can stop GWB, he thinks, at a much lower cost in campaign expenses (a mere $100-150 million, as compared to billions) than would be required to "wreck the economy." And wrecking the economy, even if he could do it, would fowl his own nest and likely break some law or other.

No, his so-called political objective of world peace is entirely fake IMO, a cover story to gain friends on the left and to shield his real objective. That is to assure the Federal Reserve Board continues to float the dollar and drive its value up and down, allowing his currency "investments" to make additional billions for him.

For a short while last year, the Fed was rumored to have changed to a policy of keeping the dollar's value stable. That is when Soros surfaced with his intent to spend whatever it takes to defeat GWB.

So don't be sucked into taking his political cover story seriously. We need to expose his desire to keep the dollar's value "floating," which is so ignorant a thing to do that the country understood how harmful it is to each of us until we arrived at the "extremely high IQ level" of the last 35 years.

[CyberAnt]

Thanks! It beats shouting at my TV!!

[thesummerwind]

I think that George Soros should be put on trial in Europe.

I think George Soros ought to have Janice Jackson stick her b***t in his face.