Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vote Bush in '04: The Supreme Court is too imporant!
vanity | 1/29/04 | vanity

Posted on 01/29/2004 11:36:08 AM PST by votelife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-243 next last
To: StoneColdGOP
Thanks to: Trent "Spineless" Lott.

And Orrin "Neville Chamberlin" Hatch

81 posted on 01/29/2004 12:25:46 PM PST by NeoCaveman (John Kerry replaces Nancy Pelosi as the botox babe of the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: aodell
There's always something that is "too important". I won't be sold a bill of goods anymore. This president is NOT a conservative.

If this president is not the next president the next president WILL be a Liberal.

82 posted on 01/29/2004 12:26:02 PM PST by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
The only judicial "appointments" the President can make are when the Senate is in recess, and such an appointment is good only for a limited term. The operative term is "nominate," as per your quotation. The same applies for other officers of the country.

Don't let your screen name influence your posts.

83 posted on 01/29/2004 12:26:56 PM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: will1776
Sorry, the Clinton years of hell all run together... And it's not like DOLE was much better!
84 posted on 01/29/2004 12:26:57 PM PST by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Huck
if Bork had been confirmed instead of Kennedy, Roe would have been defeated...So it's not all Reagan, the Dem Senate Reagan had to deal with forced his hand.
85 posted on 01/29/2004 12:27:02 PM PST by votelife (Elect a Filibuster Proof Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: sasafras
ping

that's what has me disgusted,
there's no telling what else he would send to the SCOTUS
republican presidents appointed a majority of the current crew and they couldn't get 4 votes to even listen to Silveira and then turn around and ok CFR,

>>shrug<<

r
86 posted on 01/29/2004 12:27:45 PM PST by woerm (student of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: votelife
Thanks for the post.

I've about had it with Free Republic these past few weeks. Today was about as bad as I have seen it. Many so-called Republicans are willing to throw away their vote with the reason being "I'll show him". Yeah, go to DU and they'll make you an honorary member.

I strongly disagree with the President on certain issues. Spending is way out of control. However, I do NOT want to see a President Kerry. A recent Opinion Journal article highlighted that the dems are jumping on the Bush's spending at the same time calling on social programs that will dwarf anything Bush has planned. When this country gets attacked again, when are military is cut again, when we must go to the UN for a permission slip, when taxes are raised, when gay marriage is legalized, when abortion laws are strengthened will those same FReeper still be able to say "I'll show you".

Go ahead and bite off your collective noses to spite your collective long faces.
87 posted on 01/29/2004 12:27:48 PM PST by Republican Red (Karmic hugs welcomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
George HW Bush gave us nothing. Every last one of the Perot voters knew the consequences of voting for Perot. They knew that they were giving the White House, the House, and the Senate to the Democrats. They had the choice between a moderate and a liberal. They chose they liberal. They gave us Whitewater and Monica. Clinton is nothing but their fault.
88 posted on 01/29/2004 12:28:10 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Appease "my-way-or-the-highway" conservatives. Build new roads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
They're both piles of manure.

Sellouts all.
89 posted on 01/29/2004 12:28:20 PM PST by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2
lovin' it! Then say, "add 4 more years to those ages."
90 posted on 01/29/2004 12:29:22 PM PST by votelife (Elect a Filibuster Proof Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: votelife
"I feel many conservatives are missing the big picture..."

Unfortunately, we do see the big picture. Bush is a socialist. The supreme court hoax was pulled on us the last time around and some arent going to fall for it again.

91 posted on 01/29/2004 12:29:37 PM PST by gnarledmaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
None of them were nominated to the SCOTUS, but it is clearly Bush's intention that at least some of them do when the ones currently there croak or retire.
92 posted on 01/29/2004 12:30:26 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Appease "my-way-or-the-highway" conservatives. Build new roads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: votelife
Here's my analogy.

You're hungry, very hungry. You are offered two choices, a thin and watery soup, and a hamburger patty. But what you really want is a T-Bone steak. You really really want that.

Do you turn down the hamburger and go with the terrible soup, simply because the "meat" was not as good as what you wanted?

93 posted on 01/29/2004 12:30:29 PM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
true, but would you rather have a good pick gone bad or a bad pick (lonni guenier) from the get go.

Scalia was a good pick.
Renquist was a good pick.
Thomas was a good pick.
94 posted on 01/29/2004 12:30:59 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn
1. what do you think Bush could have done to get Estrada confirmed?

2. assuming your strategy worked, how do you think it would have played in the media, ie would the trouble have been worth it for an appeals court nominee?

95 posted on 01/29/2004 12:31:19 PM PST by votelife (Elect a Filibuster Proof Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
Oh, he'll nominate them, all right; his Federal judge picks (Estrada, Pickering, Rogers Brown, etc.) have been very impressive. But unless he can put the squeeze on Frist and Hatch to actually DO something about getting them confirmed, Leaky Leahy and Co. will make sure they never get confirmed.

The Republicans were highly exposed in the last Senatorial campaign and pulled it out thanks in large part to the judge issue. The Dems are highly exposed this time. If one or two of them fall because of the judge issue, the blockade will break whether the Repub's get 60 or not. The Dems know they are exposed again in '06.

Thune beating Daschle is tremendously important.

96 posted on 01/29/2004 12:31:33 PM PST by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: will1776
They had the choice between a moderate and a liberal.

Moderates and liberals a distinction without a difference.

If Cliton hadn't been a sleaze and a liar, what would have been the diffrence in the canidates?

97 posted on 01/29/2004 12:31:49 PM PST by NeoCaveman (John Kerry replaces Nancy Pelosi as the botox babe of the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: votelife
Two reasons to vote Bush - (1) the courts (2) the terrorists.

That's what it boils down to....

Good vanity!

98 posted on 01/29/2004 12:32:01 PM PST by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
*Karmic hug sent*
99 posted on 01/29/2004 12:33:16 PM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
and I'd be out there opposing that one too,

He doesn't think the 2nd ammendment 'confers' and individual right.

bzzzzzt

next..
r
100 posted on 01/29/2004 12:34:26 PM PST by woerm (student of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson