Posted on 01/26/2004 5:45:19 PM PST by Golden Eagle
In fact, NO. That's a strawman and a non sequitur all rolled up together.
My point about this virus, as with most virii, is that they feed off the vulnerabilities of a POPULAR O/S: Windoze.
Get over yourself. I don't "blame" this on Microsoft, (like you BLAMED this on Linux advocates.)
If you insist on the analogy, then do it correctly.
When a gun is used to intentionally kill someone, it is not defective, and there should be no liability for the manufacturer. But, when a shoddy gun explodes because of a material defect in the hands of a user at a gun range, then the manufacturer should be liable.
If a hacker uses a Microsoft server to launch attacks on SCO, then there should be no liability for Microsoft. But when Microsoft knowingly ships defective software to innocent folks that can be "exploded" remotely in the face of the user, then maybe they do deserve some liabilty.
If it turns out that all Kwikset Deadbolt locks had a secret skeleton key that opens them all, and burglars found out about it, shouldn't Kwikset be responsible at a minimum, for replacing those vulnerable locks?
WHO is very obviously a victim?
I am not in a hurry to do anything but attribute the slowdown in net-traffic due to MyDoom worm between the criminals (the hackers) and their preferred platform (Windows machines.)
I am NOT indicting Microsoft like YOU are indicting Linux afficionados.
If Microsoft is a victim, then it is of their own making.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.