Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh's pill use not extraordinary, lawyer says
Miami Herald ^ | Jan. 26, 2004 | DANIEL de VISE

Posted on 01/26/2004 4:48:57 PM PST by AlwaysLurking

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 501-505 next last
To: AlwaysLurking
They concluded the state public records law required releasing the plea dealings, even though doing so violates ethical rules for lawyers.

Black and other prominent South Florida attorneys said they couldn't recall another case of plea negotiations released to the public.

So its never been done before, but somehow this time it was proper to do so?

No way

61 posted on 01/26/2004 6:37:00 PM PST by Cubs Fan (liberalism's ultimate goal-the reversal of good and evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cubs Fan
"So its never been done before, but somehow this time it was proper to do so? "

Did anyone ever ask for EVERTHING going back 3 years before ?

http://www.landmarklegal.org/latest_developments.cfm?webpage_id=564

I wonder how many of the requestors (?) threatened a lawsuit 2 days later on the assumption that something was going to be held back ?

http://www.landmarklegal.org/latest_developments.cfm?webpage_id=567

The moral of the story seems to be -

Watch what you wish for... you might get it !
62 posted on 01/26/2004 6:50:17 PM PST by RS (Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Cubs Fan
I think they need to file a civil rights lawsuit for the unlawful release of the documents. Perhaps a multimillion dollar lawsuit from Black and Rush along with ethics complaints to the state bar association would bother them a little. Rush has enough money to keep it in courts and to dig up enough to make things really embarassing and uncomfortable for the turds in Palm Beach. After such a lawsuit, he could claim conflict on the part of the county if they choose to seek charges and ask it to be moved to a less liberal jurisdiction. Any thoughts on this as a strategy?
63 posted on 01/26/2004 6:59:13 PM PST by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE
Any thoughts on this as a strategy?

I like it, He lurks now and again here, I hope he says your post and does it.

64 posted on 01/26/2004 7:04:22 PM PST by Cubs Fan (liberalism's ultimate goal-the reversal of good and evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy
I am sorry about your misfortune. And I agree, what is the big deal here?
65 posted on 01/26/2004 7:07:17 PM PST by Enterprise ("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
I don't see where the doctor shopping comes in, if what he has taken is apparently well within the medical limits needed to control pain. We shall see.
66 posted on 01/26/2004 7:08:50 PM PST by Enterprise ("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RS
---The moral of the story seems to be - Watch what you wish for... you might get it !---

Don't be ridiculous they of course did not ask for documents they themselves sent (which are specifically marked maintain confidentiality) and documents they already have (the plea offers) to be sent to newspapers. (which are not supposed to be made public)

White wash it all you want. Its a clear violation of ethics on the SA's part.
67 posted on 01/26/2004 7:12:57 PM PST by Cubs Fan (liberalism's ultimate goal-the reversal of good and evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: King Black Robe
The common dosage for some of the pain medications, vicodin (hydrocodone), percodan (oxycodone), etc., is one or two pills every four hours. With long term medication for chronic, intractable, pain the dose could run as high as 12 pills per day. Certainly, the average of 8.5 pills per day is not out of line with that estimate.

Non-narcotic agents are not as effective for treating chronic pain. On problem is they reach saturation (maximum analgesic effect) before the pain is controlled. Another problem is toxic effects are observed at higher doses. Tylenol does not have much margin of safety befor liver damage occurs. NSAID's will damage the digestive tract at higher doses.
68 posted on 01/26/2004 7:14:42 PM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Black was just on Hannity and Colmes and said it was one of several leaks that were merely trying to damages Rush's image. I imagine the stories will stop now that Things facts are coming out. Wasn't there a story a couple weeks ago about a Florida state Senator that was addicted to prescription meds.The story stated that was actually caught forging her own prescriptions but was given a pass on charges since she went to rehab. Seems too be a double standard in Florida if that is true.
69 posted on 01/26/2004 7:16:34 PM PST by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: AlwaysLurking
Black reasoned that the quantity of medicine Limbaugh is accused of ingesting -- 1,800 pills in 210 days -- works out to roughly 8.5 pills a day

accused of ingesting means that this is all the pills that Rush's defense team will acknowledge (not admit to). This does not remotely account for the accusations and allegations of the maid he was allegedly buying from, etc. So what we have here is a classic legal defense - stay silent for weeks and weeks and weeks until you have all the information known by your accusers, then only acknowledge the amount your accused of, and ignore all other allegations.

Ala Martha Stewart, etc. Makes me sick.
70 posted on 01/26/2004 7:18:43 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE
Yes. Black talked about that. It doesn't surprise me that she was given a pass while the Inquisitor's office comes full tilt after Rush. Buncha B..tards!
71 posted on 01/26/2004 7:18:50 PM PST by Enterprise ("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: punster
Been there on the NSAIDs was taking 2400mg of Ibuprofen after the initial injury. I got to where I couldn't eat because of what it was doing to my stomach and digestion.
72 posted on 01/26/2004 7:30:33 PM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
I am amused by those who think that the # of pills that were prescribed suggests he was buying them at a Walmart in brown paper bags.
73 posted on 01/26/2004 7:31:28 PM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Cubs Fan
"Don't be ridiculous they of course did not ask for documents they themselves sent (which are specifically marked maintain confidentiality) and documents they already have (the plea offers) to be sent to newspapers. (which are not supposed to be made public)"

Rush and Black didn't ask for anything to be released - Landmark Legal did it all on their own -

http://www.landmarklegal.org/latest_developments.cfm?webpage_id=564

... and threatened legal action 2 days later

http://www.landmarklegal.org/latest_developments.cfm?webpage_id=567

Marking it "Confidential" means nothing to the Florida Sunshine Laws.
http://myfloridalegal.com/sunshine

Citing laws against using it as evidence means nothing also...

http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=Ch0893/SEC13.HTM&Title=-

http://www.jcrobbins.com/FlaRCrimP/FlaRCrimP-3.172.htm

Florida law REQUIRED their release to anyone who asked.
74 posted on 01/26/2004 7:32:09 PM PST by RS (Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AlwaysLurking
If Limbaugh did not plead guilty, the state would release his confidential medical records.

That sounds like blackmail, but since the government is doing it then I guess it's OK.

Another thing that gets me about this, on one hand they say it was doctor shopping he was guilty of, on the other hand they say it was purchasing illegal drugs off the street.

Which is the LIE?


75 posted on 01/26/2004 7:37:14 PM PST by unixfox (Close the borders, problems solved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlwaysLurking
BTW here's some of the salient stuff I heard Black talk about on Hannity tonight--

Limbaugh has undergone several unsuccessful surgeries to fix his back pain because of a spinal problem (didn't catch the name for it), but none of the surgeries have worked, that's why he was put on meds.

Only surgical option left is to go through his throat to get at his spine. (for a guy who makes his living speaking a pretty scary procedure I imagine)

The Standard operating procedure for a court opening med records in the florida statute is having a hearing then a subpoena (neither of which happened). Not a warrant, which is what was used.

A democrat state senator (didn't hear the name) recently was caught forging their own prescriptions. Charges were dropped when drug treatment was sought.

David and Wilma Cline were given blanket immunity. David Cline has a prior conviction for trafficking cocaine

Black also mentioned Floridas "Intractable pain Statute" which can be seen here.

(other salient facts--)

only one other person has ever been charged with "doctor shopping" in Palm Beach county and the charges were later dropped

Its against the code of ethics to make plea negotiations public

The doctor shopping statute was intended to go after doctor shoppers who were hoarding meds with intent to distribute.
76 posted on 01/26/2004 7:41:11 PM PST by Cubs Fan (liberalism's ultimate goal-the reversal of good and evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlwaysLurking
Bump for Rush!

Anyone who has ever had the misery of excruciating back pain understands that 8 pills a day is about one half of the amount you'd like to have.

77 posted on 01/26/2004 7:42:11 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RS
---Florida law REQUIRED their release to anyone who asked.---

Even though its an ethics violation to do so? *BUZZ* not

Landmark didn't ask for confidential plea agreements to be sent to newspapers.
78 posted on 01/26/2004 7:47:00 PM PST by Cubs Fan (liberalism's ultimate goal-the reversal of good and evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Do you know how to do that?
If so...do it and post the results here...

WOW wouldn't it be great to find the Judge up to no good??
79 posted on 01/26/2004 7:51:20 PM PST by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cubs Fan
Oops, for anyone who wanted to see Floridas "Intractable pain statute" here's the link

http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?mode=View%20Statutes&SubMenu=1&App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=CH0458/Sec326.HTM
80 posted on 01/26/2004 7:51:59 PM PST by Cubs Fan (liberalism's ultimate goal-the reversal of good and evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 501-505 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson