Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush names Miss. Judge Charles Pickering to federal appeals court
MSNBC.com ^ | DocCincy

Posted on 01/16/2004 12:14:46 PM PST by DocCincy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 601-619 next last
To: JohnnyZ
Come on, you are smarter than that. He had strong minority support from his own state, which will play into the process of painting the Democrat party as out of touch.
161 posted on 01/16/2004 12:42:20 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Of course he'll get paid. I don't know where you heard that.

That gets repeated over and over as gospel here on FR.

162 posted on 01/16/2004 12:42:36 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: All
the DUmmies are already b*tching about it in Breaking News. This should be fun.
163 posted on 01/16/2004 12:42:47 PM PST by honeygrl (If I had a dollar for every time I had 60 cents, I would be in Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
It's to influence the outcome of the caucus vote on Monday.

That is too cool - fire up the radical left fringe, just b4 the caucus??? LOL !!!!

164 posted on 01/16/2004 12:42:50 PM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Let's try for two for one deal here. Get them both!
165 posted on 01/16/2004 12:42:50 PM PST by Marysecretary (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

"We defeated Judge Pickering? Victory! This calls for a drink!"

"Bush did a recess appointment? Defeat! Let's drown our sorrows! How about a drink?"

"Hey--is it cold outside? That calls for drink!"

166 posted on 01/16/2004 12:42:58 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
I think recess appointees do get paid. The Constitution does not mention not paying such appointees. I cannot imagine Clintoids taking such temporary appointments without salary. So why would Judge Pickering give up his judgeship for a one-year stint that has no salary?
167 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:06 PM PST by Theodore R. (When will they ever learn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw; All
I would be happy never to hear the words "Neverland Ranch" and "Michael Jackson" again in my life--unless it's in the same sentence as "Will never be mentioned again on this news channel."
168 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:08 PM PST by homemom (Watch and be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Yep
169 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:08 PM PST by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: bourbon
HELL YEAH!
170 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:18 PM PST by wylenetheconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: sciencediet
It has been three years! How much longer can Bush wait to appoint others?

They're gonna make an election-year push to confirm a few, but probably it'll be 2005.

171 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:21 PM PST by JohnnyZ (This Week in Senate Races: David Beasley, Katherine Harris, Gary Hart, and Dan Blue DECIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Its called speculating. That's what FR is supposed to encourage. If posts were to be restricted to what was common and public knowledge, FR would be a pretty lame place.
172 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:51 PM PST by KantianBurke (2+2 does NOT equal 5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
GWB appoints Pickering, THAT calls for a drink.
Cheers!
173 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:52 PM PST by gimmealewinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Fury
The REcess appointment lasts till next time Congress is in session; July 2005!!! Then the process starts again.

I bet the Libs have their panties in a major bunch! Tee-Hee!
174 posted on 01/16/2004 12:44:05 PM PST by homemom (Watch and be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: commish; hole_n_one
Down goes Daschle! Down goes Daschle!

ROFLMAO!!!


175 posted on 01/16/2004 12:44:43 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Ok, there's the precedent, I guess. Thanks for the info.
176 posted on 01/16/2004 12:44:45 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
***Chuck Schumer just pooped his pants.***

Underwear sales will be WWWAAAAYYYY up in DC! :-)
177 posted on 01/16/2004 12:44:53 PM PST by homemom (Watch and be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Salary for Recess Appointees

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/5503.html

Sec. 5503. - Recess appointments 


(a) Payment for services may not be made from the Treasury 
of the United States to an individual appointed during a 
recess of the Senate to fill a vacancy in an existing 
office, if the vacancy existed while the Senate was in 
session and was by law required to be filled by and with 
the advice and consent of the Senate, until the appointee 
has been confirmed by the Senate. This subsection does not 
apply - 

     (1) if the vacancy arose within 30 days before the 
     end of the session of the Senate; 

     (2) if, at the end of the session, a nomination for 
     the office, other than the nomination of an 
     individual appointed during the preceding recess of 
     the Senate, was pending before the Senate for its 
     advice and consent; or 

    (3) if a nomination for the office was rejected by the 
    Senate within 30 days before the end of the session 
    and an individual other than the one whose nomination 
    was rejected thereafter receives a recess appointment. 


(b) A nomination to fill a vacancy referred to by 
paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) of this 
section shall be submitted to the Senate not later than 40 
days after the beginning of the next session of the Senate 



178 posted on 01/16/2004 12:44:56 PM PST by Fixit (It's about damn time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: DocCincy
Great news. There's more then one way to skin a Demlib!

Congrats Mister President.

179 posted on 01/16/2004 12:44:56 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I hope so! It aggrevated me no end to have Charles Schumer and Diane Feinstein get up and oppose Bush's key judicial nominations because they were "out of the mainstream of American values," as if New York and California ARE in the mainstream! Bush should make the judicial nominations, and the Dems' obstruction, a campaign issue.
180 posted on 01/16/2004 12:45:03 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 601-619 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson