Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rolling Stone Editor and Adobe Executive Put $800,000 Into Salon Web Site (Bad Money After Bad!)
The New York Times ^ | January 15, 2004 | David Carr

Posted on 01/14/2004 11:54:21 PM PST by Timesink

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Timesink
>Jann Wenner, the founder and editor of Rolling Stone magazine and chairman of Wenner Media, said yesterday that he would invest $200,000 in the Salon Media Group, the financially struggling Internet media company, and join its board.

So much for the thought
that the world is defined by
supply and demand ...

Nobody on earth
is demanding more Salon.
But it just won't die!

21 posted on 01/15/2004 7:46:08 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Well, considering Abode's knife-in-the-back mods to their own software packages followed up by support to a turbo-Leftist site, I'd say I'll never purchase another piece of Adobe software.

Adobe has pissed me off several times in the past, from having a programmer who showed the weakness of their eBook products (and allowing fair use) jailed, to the initial InDesign upgrade fiascos and lately the currency recognition.

But there's still no viable replacement for Photoshop for me, and InDesign's only competition is QuarkExpress, which is made by Quark (and Quark doesn't work as seamlessly with Photoshop). Quark is firstly a horrible company with bad licensing and support, but it's also seriously into gay activism due to its gay founder.

22 posted on 01/15/2004 8:21:11 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Charity never comes free. I guess Warnock and Wenner will now be cutting the pay of all their illegal nannies, cooks, housekeepers, gardeners and corporate office cleaners, to make up the difference.
23 posted on 01/15/2004 9:45:42 AM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Quark is firstly a horrible company with bad licensing and support, but it's also seriously into gay activism due to its gay founder.

I always wondered where the "Q" came from.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

24 posted on 01/15/2004 11:23:47 AM PST by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Apple computers would pretty much fade away without Photoshop.
25 posted on 01/15/2004 11:30:18 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
They are just buying political advertising in a way that CFR never addressed.
26 posted on 01/15/2004 12:09:17 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Are the NYT readers so stupid that the paper has to tell them twice how long Salon has been in business. First they said 1995, then a couple of paragraphs later, they were able to deduce that this equates to 8 years. Or else they are just so impressed that it has lasted this long that they had to stress it.

TC

27 posted on 01/15/2004 7:05:32 PM PST by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Apple computers would pretty much fade away without Photoshop.

And Final Cut Pro and QuarkXpress.

28 posted on 01/16/2004 5:56:07 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Final Cut and Quark are not Adobe products, but without Photoshop, Quark would be nothing.
29 posted on 01/16/2004 6:00:05 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
I guess compared to a Boy George musical it is a sound investment.
30 posted on 01/16/2004 6:02:40 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Death before dhimmi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: js1138
Final Cut and Quark are not Adobe products, but without Photoshop, Quark would be nothing.

I think we were talking about software necessary to the life of Apple, at least in the professional world. Quark even without Photoshop is huge, especially in the publishing and newspaper industry. That's one reason for Quark's arrogance and general habit of slapping around the customer, because they've had a virtual monopoly in that area for years.

32 posted on 01/16/2004 6:19:53 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
The more money the rich lefties put into useless, rarely read, boooorrrrring sites like Salon, the less there will be for other far-left causes that really do damage.

I say "keep shovelling, guys."

Also, I hope their landlord keeps up with the news. Last time I checked, Salon owed a couple hundred thou in back rent.
33 posted on 01/17/2004 1:10:15 AM PST by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson