Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amnesty and Culture
LewRockwell.com | January 13, 2004 | Rep. Ron Paul, MD

Posted on 01/13/2004 7:12:33 AM PST by philosofy123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Bush's action reminds me of an example; it goes like this: A gang of car thieves go around steeling cars and ripping them apart and selling the parts. When the police finally found them, the American consumers complained that they will lose a good source of cheap auto parts. The police decided instead to allow the gangs to continue on stealing cars on the condition that they would have to report the number of car parts, and charge sales tax. This story blows my mind. There is no way in hell any self respecting conservative should ever support such a scheme.
1 posted on 01/13/2004 7:12:33 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: philosofy123

No Blood for Lettuce!

Click here and here for lists of crimes committed by illegal aliens.


2 posted on 01/13/2004 7:20:21 AM PST by putupon (I'm being punished; I have to post "I will not call the President the J name 100 times".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123; Sabertooth; B4Ranch
paul ping
3 posted on 01/13/2004 7:20:55 AM PST by glock rocks (molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
Dr. Paul is a good example of no nonsense politician.
4 posted on 01/13/2004 7:22:18 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
That, he is.
5 posted on 01/13/2004 7:28:43 AM PST by glock rocks (molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: putupon
I like that lettuce picture. The global village thing that became a reality with the satellites and the internet has made it possible for people from the furthest points away from America (politically/culturally/religiously) to be able to reside as a parasite in the US, while their hearts are in their native lands. It is very cheap now for a foreigner to talk to his family back home on the phone. Long distance calls are now 10 cents a minute in comparison to $3 a minute 30 years ago. His cable company broadcast his music and movies in his native tong, and the worst point is that they would also broadcast the news with his native land spin on it, a la Al Jazera news.

Based on the above, the current immigrants, legal and illegal will not join the melting pot of our main culture like other immigrants did fifty years ago. Therefore, our society will always have many pockets of different cultures that are here only by their body, but their hearts is always in their home lands. They are here only to suck some money out of this rich land, and go back to their native lands. The only problem with this picture is the dragging of our wages to the third world wage, thus creating a huge underclass in America.

6 posted on 01/13/2004 7:38:59 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
Adding millions of foreign citizens to the Social Security, Medicare, and disability rolls will only hasten the inevitable day of reckoning.

Can someone please show me where Bush's plan says we will do this?

As far as allowing temporary workers to take Social Security savings with them when they leave America and return home, what is the problem with that? First of all, it is part of the incentive to make them want to leave again rather than overstay their status. Second, if it is part of their salary that they earned and it was withheld and set aside.... I'm amazed that a conservative or libertarian would think the government would have a right to keep those funds.

7 posted on 01/13/2004 8:01:42 AM PST by Tamzee (EARTH FIRST!!! We'll stripmine the other planets later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Part of any guest worker program should be that the workers and employers kick into Social Security but get nothing from it. Let these guest workers help keep Social Security solvent for Americans.

That would be a nice "tax" on the guest worker program
8 posted on 01/13/2004 8:09:44 AM PST by dennisw (“We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American way.” - Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
Problems arise when immigrants refuse to assimilate and show little interest in becoming American citizens

With respect to La Raza (The Race) a Mexican org., that is an understatement. They blatantly proclaim that one of their goals is to return CA to Mexico. Also, CA voting ballets are already available in five different languages. Anyone see anything wrong with that? I'm not a world traveler but I don't think that kind of thing exists in too many other countries around this globe.

9 posted on 01/13/2004 8:18:57 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Yes, as if that nice "tax" would make anyone here support the proposal anyways. IMHO, the income tax should be sufficient... the funds set aside for Social Security would be money they earned, actually be a fairly minimal amount and yet still a great incentive for them to return home so they can receive it. This means that they won't be staying here to collect it from our Social Security Administration and consequently won't be here to mooch of off Medicare, etc...
10 posted on 01/13/2004 8:21:24 AM PST by Tamzee (EARTH FIRST!!! We'll stripmine the other planets later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123; billbears; RonPaulLives
"The president claims that America lacks the political will to deport the eight to twelve million illegal aliens already here, so we have no choice but to grant them visas."


This is an excellent way to frame the argument of the President's position in light of the political situation that brought us the Iraq War.
11 posted on 01/13/2004 8:22:17 AM PST by JohnGalt (Neoconservatives: Appeasers to the Alien Invaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
Bush's action reminds me of an example; it goes like this: A gang of car thieves go around steeling cars and ripping them apart and selling the parts...

A poor analogy, but characteristic of some of the fuzzy logic in the national "debate" on illegal immigration. How about this: Jean Valjean steals a loaf of bread to feed his family and is sentenced to ten years in prison? There are criminals and drug traffickers among the illegal immigrants, but most of them are doing exactly what you would do if the you were born in "Mexico (not so) Lindo". Politics is the art of the possible, and while you and I and every other dispassionate conservative might volunteer to form a national posse to go after the illegal aliens already in our midst, most of our fellow Americans will not support an intrusive, socially and economically disruptive mass national effort to locate and deport 8-12 million undocumented border violators.

The President's proposal is flawed in that it's all carrot and little stick (i.e. scant attention to better border protection or penalties for those who choose not to accept the 3-year visas), but at it's a darn sight better than the blanket amnesty the Democrats want. Maybe the Tom Tancredos in Congress will work to correct the flaws in the President's plan, or propose their own politically practical solutions.

12 posted on 01/13/2004 8:22:51 AM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Can someone please show me where Bush's plan says we will do this?

Probably not, you don't want to see it. I'm amazed that a conservative or libertarian would think the government would have a right to keep those funds.

Under current law, if you die the government keeps all your "contributions," because that is exactly what they are.

Federal Isurance Contribution Act

And like any good insurance program there is a death benefit, currently $250.00, but only if you qualify.

There IS No Social Security FUND!


13 posted on 01/13/2004 8:33:06 AM PST by itsahoot (The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks; philosofy123
The president claims that America lacks the political will to deport the eight to twelve million illegal aliens already here,

This President is not anywhere close to knowing how we feel about illegal immigration.

He needs to sit down with some common folks from Cochise County, Arizona to discuss what's happening in their communities. Then talk with the Border Patrol Agents MINUS all supervisors who do not drive a 4X4 every day in the dirt arresting the illegals and explain to them why he won't promote enforcement of our immigration laws by ALL LEO's. Local backup of the BP is necessary to catch these crimnals.

"According to a RoperASW poll from last year, 83 percent of Americans support mandatory detention and forfeiture of property for illegal immigrants, followed by deportation."

I'm one of the 83%.

If the President Bush or Tom Ridge would announce that in six months they will be paying a $50 per head bounty for each illegal alien on American soil there would be a mad rush for the borders.

A policeman in a car costs the average city about $200 an hour. Helicopters cost at least $2000 an hour with the ground crews. What is the full cost of a teacher per hour? $140.00 or there about.

If we could get illegal aliens to turn each other in, just the ones trying to slip through the net, (I know thousands would attempt it) we would save billions in law enforcement, welfare programs, unemployment, medical care, job training and schools the first year.

Do all this under Executive Order and tell the Courts to back off. This is national security!

Just announce that we will be dividing the country up into various sized quadrants depending on population per square mile.

Any employer who has employed an illegal alien five months from the announcement date will be fined $5000 per employee. One month later enforcement begins. This will give employers 5 months to shed the illegals and hire legally papered actual American citizens.

Then on the announced date, start in a state such as Oklahoma. Well centered, not overly populated and clean the state out. This would give Homeland, INS and Border Patrol time to install their co-agents in various court houses around the country to verify a persons paperwork, i.e.. birth certificates, hospital records, etc.

Get caught and the result would be every foreign national who is not in America legally would forfeit their belongings and be shipped out within 24 hours. These forfeited belongings would then be given to local churches for distribution to the needy. Another cost saver!

Go state to state from the epicenter sweeping out the criminals who have successfully avoided suspicion. They already had 5 months to get out, hanging around to test the system carries a SEVERE penalty. They won't be able to say they weren't warned.

This enforcement would apply to illegals from every country in the world, not just Mexico.

Imagine the number of Chinese who would be taking the ship home with everything in the house, new cars, you name it would be on those ships. The thousands of Canadians who decided the USA was better than Canada would be headed North.

How many schools could be closed? How many hospitals and state paid housing tracts? How many welfare offices?

How many state and federal employees would find out that they have the time to actually give good service to their American customers?

Oh yes, it would be an economic shocker in the amount of taxes that could be reduced or used to actually improve something needed for American citizens, instead of illegal foreigners.

Want an approximate number of the population drop? Try 50 million+ with the majority over 30 years of age, having been illegal residents of America for over ten years.

Just imagine the frantic squealing from our politicians thinking of the lost votes and contributions. That would be a sideshow worth watching!

Scan the whole page for good reading!
Conservative Debate Handbook

14 posted on 01/13/2004 8:36:51 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie
it's a darn sight better than the blanket amnesty the Democrats want

Two flaws in that argument:

The measure of good legislation is not taken by comparison to bad legislation. Blatant "blanket amnesty" doesn't have a prayer in hades of passing, given public opposition to illegal immigration, whereas an amnesty by another name has a chance, as long as it can be sold under the cover of "compassion" to the vast majority of uninformed voters.

Congress, and the White House, is currently controlled by Republicans. It therefore takes a majority of the Republican vote to pass legislation.

15 posted on 01/13/2004 8:51:20 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie
"most of our fellow Americans will not support an intrusive, socially and economically disruptive mass national effort to locate and deport 8-12 million undocumented border violators."

Would you accept a large tax cut to endure this for two years?

Please read #14

16 posted on 01/13/2004 9:03:56 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
A FReeper's Guide To Immigration Reform

"What remains to be seen is if this country has the capacity to accommodate, and assimilate, an unending wave of mass immigration ¯ because failure to do so will result in a balkanized, fragmented, strife-torn and dysfunctional America."

~ Take the FReeper Immigration Reform Poll ~

17 posted on 01/13/2004 9:05:24 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
Here's ONE issue I think should be brought up on ALL these amnesty (guest worker) threads.




http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1057028/posts
(from the article)
I wonder about the assertion that no Americans, even those on welfare, will undertake those tedious, unskilled jobs. If that’s actually true, it must be because welfare is a better alternative. Yet we don’t hear any politicians clamoring that welfare benefits are too high.>>>>>>>

(my reply)
Sounds good to me. Trim some off the welfare checks, & put some of these Americans back to work, & into the SS Fund.
18 posted on 01/13/2004 9:07:56 AM PST by txdoda ("Navy-brat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
WE should not even take SS out of their pay, that way we do not have to saddle our system with them in the first place.
19 posted on 01/13/2004 9:38:57 AM PST by douglas1 (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Probably not, you don't want to see it.

Does your answer mean that Bush's plan outlines this somewhere and you won't point to it or that you don't know where this claim is coming from?

I never said there was a Social Security "Fund". I still think we should allow legal guest workers to withdraw the money that they "contributed" to our Social Security when they leave our country and don't take part in the program. It's incentive for them to LEAVE when their legal status expires... I thought that was what we conservatives wanted after all? :-)

20 posted on 01/13/2004 9:40:36 AM PST by Tamzee (EARTH FIRST!!! We'll stripmine the other planets later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson