Skip to comments.
Stocks Soar on Improved Demand for Kitten Chow
wilmington journal ^
| Hazel Trice Edney
Posted on 01/05/2004 7:01:41 AM PST by Joseph Stix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: Joseph Stix
Hey would you take this home with you?
DU
What can I say they must be bored,
We all know they are DUmb.
I guess its tuff to hang out where,
The best poster is scum.
So they come here and lurk about,
And post their libral spew.
We ZOT the trolls and send them home,
Its fun for me and you.
Ive heard that they dont like me much,
I guess they think Im bad.
Conspiracy Guy freaks them out,
For them I do feel sad.
Imagine just how hard it is,
To live without a clue.
Of right and wrong or what is real,
Their light bills overdue.
So to you trolls I say, hello,
I hope you do get better.
CG is glad you hate his guts,
Please do send me a letter.
Conspiracy Guy 1/2/04
21
posted on
01/05/2004 7:17:53 AM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(No words were harmed during the production of this tagline.)
To: Joseph Stix
the highest percentage since six years ago when 71 percent was recorded Some help for anyone, like the author, who thinks with their feelings rather than their mind:
2003 - 6 = 1997
22
posted on
01/05/2004 7:18:25 AM PST
by
Toskrin
(No world leader has been caught in a hole that size since Bill Clinton.)
To: Joseph Stix
homelessness always makes a big appearance in an election year...its all W's fault...
23
posted on
01/05/2004 7:18:49 AM PST
by
alisasny
(Thankyou to all who made 12/28 party so wonderful in NYC)
To: .38sw
I believe you.
It's a known fact that during Billy-Jeff's reign, aka Willard, there weren't any homeless. The present homeless people all lived in gazillion dollar mansions, drove Bentleys and their kids all went to private schools. But as soon as Dubya was sworn in - BAM! The mortgages were foreclosed, the cars repossessed, the kids forced to go to public schools and take drugs.
Honest, I read it in the New York Times.
No offense meant. I'm new here so you might not know I'm being facetious and just kidding.
24
posted on
01/05/2004 7:21:27 AM PST
by
Condor51
(Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it, derived from our Maker. John Adams)
To: .38sw
of course - people only become homeless when an 'R' is in the White House
25
posted on
01/05/2004 7:21:30 AM PST
by
petercooper
(DEAN = Democrats Experiencing Another Nightmare)
To: .38sw
It's clearly George Bush's fault. We had no homelessness during the Clinton administration. NoneYou must have forgotten......homelessness is ILLEGAL during Democrat administrations, so they all go home to San Francisco where they get room and board until a Republican administration is elected.
26
posted on
01/05/2004 7:22:02 AM PST
by
PISANO
(God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE - They will not FALTER - They will not FAIL!!!!!)
To: Joseph Stix
Considering most if not all of these major cities have Democratic mayors/councils, I would not be surprised if these numbers were fabricated. I live in Seattle, and I have seen no obvious increase in the homeless in the last three years; in fact, I think there were more homeless about ten years ago. At least, their presence was much more apparent 8-10 years aogo.
27
posted on
01/05/2004 7:22:41 AM PST
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Joseph Stix
BWAHAHAHA. meow.
28
posted on
01/05/2004 7:23:29 AM PST
by
glock rocks
(Support Free Republic)
To: Howlin
LOL. Did you notice the subtle title change.
29
posted on
01/05/2004 7:24:33 AM PST
by
glock rocks
(Support Free Republic)
To: .38sw
Republicans cause homelessness. Didn't you know that?
30
posted on
01/05/2004 7:24:57 AM PST
by
snooker
To: Joseph Stix
Hello, Joseph? You still here? Hello? Hello? You signed up, posted this nice little article, and then disappeared? No comments from you?
31
posted on
01/05/2004 7:26:05 AM PST
by
.38sw
To: freeangel
There is less affordable housing, and a higher cost of living, in the most liberal cities than anywhere else - Boston, Seattle, San Francisco, New York. Why? Because socialism is in fact a modern form of aristocracy in which an elite saves the best for itself and herds the masses into apartments and other high-density living arrangments. New construction is discouraged in a myriad of ways, reducing the supply of good housing and driving up costs.
32
posted on
01/05/2004 7:26:59 AM PST
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: glock rocks
Nope, but thanks for pointing it out to me!
33
posted on
01/05/2004 7:27:42 AM PST
by
Howlin
(Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
To: glock rocks; Joseph Stix
What's your opinion?? Yeah, JS?
To: Joseph Stix
Paging Joseph Stix, paging Joseph Stix.
Are you going to stick around and defend your post?
To: Joseph Stix
Hey Joseph, kitties gotcher tongue?What's your opinion?
36
posted on
01/05/2004 7:29:41 AM PST
by
glock rocks
(Support Free Republic)
To: Joseph Stix
Let's match-up every hungry American with an obese American like the Big Brother(pardon the pun) program.
In a sane socially correct society, nobody should be too fat or too hungry.
37
posted on
01/05/2004 7:30:24 AM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
To: Joseph Stix
Cat got your tongue?
38
posted on
01/05/2004 7:30:51 AM PST
by
dighton
To: .38sw
Hello, Joseph? You still here? Hello? Hello? You signed up, posted this nice little article, and then disappeared? No comments from you?Cowardice, it the DU SOP.
To: MattMa
***Yawn***...when are the Dems going to come up with some new tactics?
Article from 1996 - In the Bush years (1989-1992), the number of homeless stories per year averaged 52.5, but in the first three years of the Clinton administration, the average dropped to 25.3 stories a year. During the Bush administration, the story count grew from 44 in 1989 to a peak of 71 in 1990, followed by 54 stories in 1991 and 43 in 1992. By contrast, stories on America's homeless dipped slightly to 35 stories in 1993, and 32 in 1994. In 1995, the number fell dramatically to just nine. When the count is broken down by network, CNN had the widest gap in reporting during the Bush years and Clinton years (90-30), closely followed by ABC (45-16), CBS (41-15), and NBC (36-15).
Media Watch
Article from 1999 - The homeless comeback Democrats rediscover an old political tool
Worst part about it is...many lamestream media viewers will believe the tripe the Dems put out.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson