Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Peroutka Announces Presidential Campaign (December 15)
Radio Liberty and Others ^ | 1/1/2004 | Adam Valle

Posted on 01/01/2004 9:48:48 PM PST by The_Eaglet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 last
To: The_Eaglet
'God, Family, Republic' Web Page of Constitution Party Presidential Candidate Michael Anthony Peroutka Now Up and Running

1/19/04 7:00:00 AM

To: National Desk, Political Reporter

Contact: John Lofton, 410-760-7897 or 301-873-4612 (cell), for Michael Anthony Peroutka; http://www.Peroutka2004.com

PASADENA, Md., Jan. 19 /U.S. Newswire/ -- http://www.Peroutka2004.com is the Web address for Michael Anthony Peroutka who is seeking the Presidential nomination of the Constitution Party. His themes are "God-Family-Republic." He believes, as George Washington did, that it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge God by obeying Him. He believes that true marriage is God-created, between a man and woman only and requires the approval of no government. And he wants to restore our original representative Constitutional republic -- which was never a "democracy."

One of five children of Anthony and Elizabeth Peroutka, Michael has served as a law partner with his brother, Stephen, for the past eighteen years in the Pasadena, Maryland law firm of Peroutka and Peroutka, P.A.. During that time he has been active in pro- life issues and has assisted and founded many organizations including "The Institute on the Constitution" that seeks to educate Americans about their own history, heritage and form of government. It was his passion for learning about and restoring Constitutional government in his home state that led him to the Constitution Party and its dedication to principle over politics.

A graduate of Loyola College in Maryland and the University of Baltimore School of Law, Michael has been active in the Constitution Party for several years and currently serves as Chairman of the Constitution Party of Maryland and is on the Executive Committee of the National Party.

Early in his professional career Michael found himself unwittingly involved in a vast criminal enterprise - an experience which dramatically altered his life's work and helped to chart the path to his intended candidacy for public office. While employed at the United States Department of Health and Human Services as a young attorney, Michael realized that none of the programs on which he was working were authorized by the United States Constitution and were therefore unlawful.

Michael lives with his wife, Diane, and their children, Timothy, Patrick and Elizabeth in Millersville, Md. He is a Bible-believing Christian.
221 posted on 01/19/2004 11:01:17 AM PST by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: jgrubbs; All; TBP; vetwife; AKA Elena; Theodore R.; Federalist 78; Mid-State Constitution Party; ..
Thanks, jgrubbs.

It's official, folks. The web presence of Michael Peroutka's campaign is now up and running!

222 posted on 01/19/2004 10:29:35 PM PST by The_Eaglet (Michael Peroutka for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: GetUsOutOfTheUnitedNations
Actually, you should be looking at the person who most likely will govern by the Constitution.

This is worth repeating, along with your handle.

This is not Bush or the 9 gnomes. I will be looking at the third party candidates or writing in someone.

Call me a spoiler, but I am voting for the person that I see as the best person to lead our country out of the Repub/Dem socialist agenda that is on the table.

223 posted on 01/20/2004 9:51:58 PM PST by The_Eaglet (Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dane; 4Freedom; rcofdayton
Gridlock is certainly preferable to the unconstitutional spending increases (such as Medicare)

Oh you mean the gridlock of having Clark, Dean, or Kerry as Commander in Chief.

It seems that they all would fall into the latter category along with Bush, so gridlock is preferable to their expected spending increases, too.

224 posted on 01/20/2004 10:39:45 PM PST by The_Eaglet (Opportunity for life: http://www.peroutka2004.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: billbears
I thought I'd bump this two month old post. Worth repeating. Also, I find it interesting and I guess ironic that the government would revere a series of documents enough to host them on their servers, but completely ignore them. I just want someone to ask Kerry (or Bush, too) what their response would be to this passage after reading this to them. What would they say? I can't even guess. The whole thing is a farce.

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to REMAIN IN THE STATE GOVERNMENTS NUMEROUS AND INDEFINITE. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. The operations of the federal government will be most extensive and important in times of war and danger; those of the State governments, in times of peace and security. As the former periods will probably bear a small proportion to the latter, the State governments will here enjoy another advantage over the federal government. The more adequate, indeed, the federal powers may be rendered to the national defense, the less frequent will be those scenes of danger which might favor their ascendancy over the governments of the particular States

Federalist 45

225 posted on 03/05/2004 7:05:45 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: billbears
I'd add that reading this, you almost feel like it's some other country's founding document or that it's written in some foreign language. It has no relationship to us now. This passage may as well have been the ranting of some nut on a park bench in DC.
226 posted on 03/05/2004 7:14:58 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson