Posted on 12/29/2003 5:09:36 PM PST by forty_years
Edited on 12/30/2003 7:53:27 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
--------------------
Years ago the serbs were invaded by mohmmedan armies who were on their way to laying siege upon Vienna in 1527 and again in 1683. The Serbs have never stopped defending themselves from the invaders. The serbs made a deal with the mohammedan invaders. They said if it takes 50 years, 100 years, 1,000 years, we want you out and we will keep fighting until you are out. When you leave, take your children, grandchildren, and great great granchildren with you. That was the deal the mohammedan invaders entered into. Somewhere along the line this continuing effort to repel the invaders was labeled racism and ethnic cleansing.
So true.
Geez... The rock concerts were held in support of sanity. The author needs to wake up and smell the coffee. Obviously he's never spent a second under heavy bombardment. What else could they do except shag and dance to the oldies?
ARM THE SERBS!
Your link about Croats "paying for their sins" in the Croatian war part doesn't link to Croats paying for their crimes over Serbs in that war, but to Croats on trial for what they did to Bosnian Muslims in the Bosnian war. Bad linkage. It seems you are trying to imitate Nebojsa Malic with your style of writing, but you can't do near as well. You simply aren't as knowledgeable, nor will you ever be, as you don't seek truth.
Another reason is that forty_years posts a lot from that rather small website - it's had less than 3,000 visitors despite being around since mid-April, at least. (His first post on FR is from that site on April 14).
Look also at some of the hateful keywords listed after the article, which I have no doubt he added: BULLY, SERBTERRORISTS, TERRORISTSERBS... He had to add both "Serb Terrorists" and "Terrorist Serbs."
Confession of Miro BajramovicIt is difficult to say how long we held prisoners. This depended on how long it took us to wear them out. In most cases we held them 4-5 days before we killed them. If they had survived, they would not have been normal. Serbs, who were good and loyal served us by digging graves, we told them that they were digging covers for machine guns. Once, one of the prisoners from Kutina said that this was the 15th or 16th cover that he was digging. He was executed on the spot. It wasn't up to him to count but to dig.
Self-interest was very popular at the moment. Thirty of us went some 50 meters in front of the first tank. We cleaned and executed everyone. After us there were others who called themselves "mercepovci", who stole from the houses and then burnt them. These were Maeralo and Rukavina ... Mercep told us to take everything away from the Serbs, and the money we found should be handed over to Headquarters for purchasing arms...
I could not say that mass executions were carried out in Pakracka Poljana. These were mostly groups of 7 to 10 people. It actually depended on how many people were in the prison at the time. Sometimes we executed people in their homes, and then blew up the house. There were no bodies left. There were many houses like this, mostly in the village of Bujavica...
It is my firm belief that if it hadn't been for the Zec family, nothing would have been known about Pakracka Poljana. It was the main key and the main reason why the unit has been looked at from this angle, and there were many Pakracka Poljanas in Croatia.
Yep, he says there were many "Pakracka Poljanas" in Croatia, which means there were many systematic genocides of Serb villages - Serbs were arrested to be interrogated, tortured, forced to dig their own graves, and then killed, or killed right away in their homes; then other Croats came by to loot the houses then burn them or blow them up, and the media was totally silent. Croats got away with genocide of Serbs and it shows in the census results - over 12.2% in 1991 to 4.5% in 2002.
Croats aren't paying today and they never paid for Jasenovac either.
From a 17,000 reported dead in January 1992, just two months later it became 200,000 by dropping the "and missing" from the 200,000 dead or missing. Further, UN officials on the ground say the level of killing was no where near justifying that increase.
Back in the early days of the Yugoslav wars, I was keeping count. American news reports began with 17,000 killed in Bosnia in early January 1993 after 9 months of civil war, then 20,000 at the end of the month. In early February 1993, the number was 145,000 "dead or missing" which by the end of the month became 200,000 "dead or missing. " And then in early March 1993, the words "or missing" were dropped and the number was established at 200,000 killed which has been repeated like a mantra ever since. General Satish Nambiar of India, who was the commander of the U.N. Protection Forces (UNPROFOR) during the period of March 1992 to March 1993, told me that he, his deputy General Lewis McKenzie, and his forces, did not witness any such level of killing. Former U.S. State Department official and head of the Yugoslav desk, George Kenney, assessed the total dead in Bosnia as somewhere between 30,000 and 50,000.http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/2001/Jul01/Thomas.htm
Nice guy, comes into your house and says this sort of stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.