The Delusion of Darwinian Natural Law

Acton Institute ^ | 12/27/03 | Marc D. Guerra

[Iris7]

Enjoyed your "are mutations harmful?" site. Familiar with this stuff. They are saying, "in the mutations we see, not too many are harmful". Well, Duh. They are going for morphology instead of chemistry, the old anatomical similarities business, Darwin's eye drawings, selection of alleles, etc. Besides, selection of alleles is not mutation any more than execution of all non blonds results in a mutation. It is mere selection. Same thing true with the dirty looking moths.

The question I ask is why are "mutations" if randomly generated not overwhelmingly destructive? Darwinists say, "Well, they aren't, that's all." I respond, "Then your model does not work, by your own admission."