Countering the Conspiracy to Destroy Black Boys: Crime and Black Supremacy

There is one theory I have heard that says white liberal teachers and angry young blacks made this tacit deal with the Devil after the upheavels of the late Sixties.
Here it is in summary-we-the white teachers-won't demand much of you academically.We won't stress you or insist you do the required work.In turn,you won't physically threaten us or be obnoxiously disruptive in class.
Sadly,way too many white liberals went for this and the damage is vast as far as young black males falling way behind everyone else academically.I must admit I have at times been complicit in this detente out of the need to keep the peace.Since I just sub now,there are many times when I break this rule and get up into these kid's faces and let them know in no uncertain terms the dire fate that awaits them in prison or the graveyard if they don't turn their lives around.
If they want to cuss me out then,fine.But the usual resonse I get is positive.They WANT someone to shake them out of their stupor!

I think your theory is true of many white liberal teachers in the classroom. But there's another group to be accounted for -- the upper-middle-class, white radicals. When I taught in New Jersey, more than once I encountered lefty bosses who did everything they could to encourage blacks and Hispanics to harass me while I was teaching.

As I wrote to one Mr. Ponytail, violence was inevitable. He had nothing but alibis -- removing the student in question would require hearings, etc. I said, so let's have hearings. Eventually, I had to go over his head to the school president, who saw to it that the thuggish young woman (who had male friends and relatives come to the class to harass me, in addition to her own constant disruptions) stopped showing up. Then at the final examination, she reappeared, claiming that the black, female student counselor who was tight with Mr. Ponytail, had told her she could take the exam. Considering what a racist the counselor was (and malingerer! The only time she exerted herself, was in encouraging the most thugggish students in school to keep up their shenanigans), it wouldn't surprise me, if she had told the thug to show up, just to provoke an incident.

Although a Cuban security guard had told me to let him know if she showed up again, I let it pass. I believe she got a zero on the test, and even if she'd passed, I'd have flunked her for gross misconduct. (But since she was also academically the worst student in class, there was little chance of her passing anything.) and yet, it wouldn't surprise me one but, if my boss overrode my "F," and passed the thug. After all, she was welcome there; I wasn't.

A new, white instructor confided in me that an assassin had showed up in his class one day, looked over the class, and left. (He didn't say "assassin," but that was clearly the upshot of the story.) The guy was too embarrrassed to tell our boss, Mr. Ponytail. He had already figured out, that Mr. P would sympathize with the assassin.

I have no doubt that Mr. Ponytail was using black and Hispanic students, to wage war on white male instructors.

I wish the Cincinnati P.D.´s critics would say what they really believe: That the police should be disarmed, and every black male who can prove that he is violent, psychotic, or both, issued a Glock semi-automatic and a few magazines of ammunition.

Er . . . doesn't the disarming of police/soldiers/government officials and the arming of civilians go counter to the liberal dogma of gun control?

But maybe liberals only object when the federal government is the target of angry armed civilians.

Hey, this is interesting. Would armed blacks be allowed to overthrow the US government? Could Mexican Texans get away with seceding from the Union and declaring a "Republic of Texas?"

I say pit all liberal dogmas against each other!

Er . . . doesn't the disarming of police/soldiers/government officials and the arming of civilians go counter to the liberal dogma of gun control?

Gun control is primarily about the disarming of whites. As far as socialists and communists are concerned, if you're a cop, soldier, etc., you're "white," since you're doin' the Man's bidding.

But maybe liberals only object when the federal government is the target of angry armed civilians.

If the civilians are white.

Hey, this is interesting. Would armed blacks be allowed to overthrow the US government? Could Mexican Texans get away with seceding from the Union and declaring a "Republic of Texas?"

Yes and yes. But the socialists always assume that only poor whites and Republicans would get raped and murdered.

I say pit all liberal dogmas against each other!

Fine with me, since white socialists insist they are pro-gay, pro-black, and pro-immigrant, even though blacks are the most homophobic, xenophobic group in America.

Gun control is primarily about the disarming of whites. As far as socialists and communists are concerned, if you're a cop, soldier, etc., you're "white," since you're doin' the Man's bidding.

Should conservatives support gun control when aimed at non-whites?

Fine with me, since white socialists insist they are pro-gay, pro-black, and pro-immigrant, even though blacks are the most homophobic, xenophobic group in America.

Traditional Black American culture (religion, food, dialect, superstitions, etc.) is almost identical to that of poor rural Southern whites. Also, the allegedly "characteristically Black" behaviors conservatives criticize are also traditionally attributed to poor rural Southern whites (the fact that the current culture rewards this behavior in Blacks may have something for its high visibility in that population).

At any rate, Blacks are the most religiously Fundamentalist and Biblically literalist segment of the population, yet are wedded to a political alliance that is opposed to these beliefs. I formerly believed one thing that kept the alliance together was the insulation of average Blacks from exactly what they are allied with, but "Rev." Al Sharpton's endorsement of homosexual marriage (has that hurt him with Black voters?) damaged that theory. It would be interesting, though, to wonder how Blacks would react were they ridiculed for creationism (which they apparently have a pass to believe in).

But as for "socialist whites," I'm afraid that label is a little arbitrary. Many anti-Black whites are socialist as can be, but since "socialism" in America connotes "anti-white" and "black/brown/red nationalism" they cannot describe themselves with that term. So they use another term, "populism" (essentially socialism for the "right people"). Many neo-Confederates (who support Celtic socialist national liberation movements and the Socialist International-affiliated Parti Quebecois) nevertheless rail against "bankers" and capitalism and laud "our populist politicians." What would happen if a movement arose that sought to give America's poor whites a standard Marxist "national liberation movement?"

These things will never happen, but the confusion in liberal reactions would be something to witness!

Gun control is primarily about the disarming of whites. As far as socialists and communists are concerned, if you're a cop, soldier, etc., you're "white," since you're doin' the Man's bidding.

Should conservatives support gun control when aimed at non-whites?

I don't think so, since the most dangerous people are already barred from legal gun ownership, on account of their prior felony convictions. Similarly, the minority citizens who are harmed the most by gun control are those who are law-abiding, since the criminals all have guns. Although a majority of those black citizens may be black supremcists, the Bill of Rights admits of no political litmus test. An exception might be if non-felon black supremcists were members of organizations which called on blacks to shoot or otherwise commit violence against whites. (Just as the First Amendment does not grant a right to incitement to riot.)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.