Posted on 12/20/2003 3:33:13 PM PST by kennedy
Revealed: the real reason for Gaddafi's WMD surrender By Julian Coman and Colin Brown (Filed: 21/12/2003)
Libya's promise to surrender its weapons of mass destruction was forced by Britain and America's seizure of physical evidence of Col Muammar Gaddafi's illegal weapons programme, the Telegraph can reveal.
United States officials say that America's hand was strengthened in negotiations with Col Gaddafi after a successful operation, previously undisclosed, to intercept transport suspected of carrying banned weapons.
Col Muammar Gaddafi The operation is said to have been carried out under the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), an international, American-led scheme to halt the spread of WMD by seizing them in transit. The PSI was first mooted by President George W Bush in May but was not officially launched until September. President Bush and Tony Blair had praised Libya's decision to give up its WMD and allow international inspectors to oversee their destruction.
Mr Bush described it as a "wise and responsible choice" while a statement issued by the Libyan foreign ministry said that the country had agreed "of its own free will" to destroy its unconventional weapons.
The PSI operation, however, added decisively to the pressure already brought to bear on Col Gaddafi by America and Britain as they prepared to attack Iraq in March.
One Cabinet minister said: "It demonstrates that change can be brought about by standing tough. There is no question that this change of heart by Gaddafi was brought about by the fact that the US and Britain were seen to be standing up to and called Saddam Hussein's bluff."
The Travellers Club in Pall Mall, beloved of spy novelists and frequented by senior officers in the intelligence services, was the venue last week for the final breakthrough talks between MI6 and Libyan intelligence officials.
British immigration rules were discreetly changed to allow the Libyans to enter the country on visas. Three Libyan officials met a four-strong British team led by William Ehrman, the director general of defence and intelligence at the Foreign Office, and including two MI6 officers, to agree the text that would be read out on Libyan television on Friday night.
Mr Blair was forced to wait until the Libyan statement had been taken down by the BBC monitoring unit, translated and its contents checked to make sure they tallied with the agreed text before he was given the go-ahead to make his announcement in Durham during the 10pm news broadcasts.
The Government is hoping that the capture of Saddam, the collapse of the European Union constitution talks, and Col Gaddafi's commitment to surrender WMD will boost Mr Blair's standing with his own backbenchers.
"It has been a triple whammy and there is a sense of success at the end of this year," said a Downing Street official. "It is important domestically, but it is also important internationally."
At a PSI conference in Washington last week, Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defence, reminded the 16 member countries - who include France, Germany, Italy and Japan in addition to Britain and America - that the threat to global security extended beyond North Korea and Iran, the focus of recent pressure from Washington over their nuclear programmes.
"While PSI participants agree that North Korea and Iran are of particular concern, we know that our efforts cannot be confined to just any one or two countries alone," Mr Wolfowitz said.
Libya has long been in American sights over its acquisition of WMD. In June, John Bolton, the under-secretary of state for arms control and international security, warned that the regime was exploiting the suspension of United Nations sanctions after the Lockerbie trial.
"Since the sanctions were lifted, Libya has been able to be more aggressive in pursuing weapons of mass destruction. Libyan agents are trying to acquire dual-use technology. That is very worrying," he said.
The Libyan foreign ministry announced yesterday that it had already sent a team to Vienna to begin talks with the International Atomic Energy Authority, the UN nuclear watchdog.
The official Libyan news agency, Jana, last night quoted Col Gaddafi as declaring that his statement on WMD was "a courageous step which deserves the support of the Libyan people".
20 December 2003: Libya agrees to dismantle all its WMD 10 September 2003: France forces UN delay over lifting Libya sanctions
According to FReeper mrobison's post on a similar thread, ABC is spinning it as well:
ABC News is already trying to spin this as something Libya had planned to do all along. They imply at their website that it had nothing to do with Bush's foreign policy, but was just part of Mohmar's attempt to internationalize his country. What a bunch of crap!
Bush's War on Terror has lead to the capture of Saddam, massive drug confiscations, and this coup in Libya (just in the last week), but they'll never give him credit for it.
Here's the link to the ABC article: ABC News Wire/AP
Especially notice these two paragraphs:
"The United States and Britain portrayed the announcement as a significant breakthrough in their efforts to curtail the spread of such weapons and keep them from a terrorist organization or hostile country.
It is clear, however, that Gadhafi has tried in recent years to ease tensions with the West, and this step was expected to further improve Libya's international standing."
24 posted on 12/20/2003 8:29:05 PM EST by mrobison
http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/uscn/others/2003/111301.htm
Col. Gaddafi had not converted to Uncle Moammar then.
And what of those sanctions? Was this really a Clinton long-range plan to bring Moammar into the modern world? In 2000 Cliff Kincaid wrote,
"Washington Post columnist Jim Hoagland has written that oil companies are behind this 'stealth' policy shift on Libya. Four U.S. oil companies -- Occidental Petroleum, Conoco, Amerada Hess and Marathon -- are reported to be anxious to return to Libya and exploit oil fields they had to abandon when U.S. and U.N. sanctions were imposed. Speaking at a panel on U.S.-Libya relations, Conoco Senior Vice President J. Michael Stinson complained that 'we are the ones who have been injured in the name of disciplining Libya' and that Libyans are producing almost half-a-million barrels a day from Conoco properties and taking all the profits.
"Williams [George Williams, the president of the Victims of Pan Am Flight 103] believes that Occidental Petroleum, a financial patron of Vice President Al Gore, is playing a key role. He called the pro-Libya policy 'a payback' for all the support the company has provided to the Clinton-Gore administration. Since 1992, according to the Center for Public Integrity, Occidental has given more than $470,000 in soft money to various Democratic committees and causes. Two days after Occidental chairman Ray Irani slept in the Lincoln Bedroom of the White House, his company dropped $100,000 on the Democratic National Committee. Occidental gave $50,000 in response to one of Gore's 'no-controlling-legal-authority' telephone fundraising calls."
Cliff Kincaid runs the Maryland-based public-policy group America's Survival (www.usasurvival.org).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.