Defense asks for investigation (Fox News Carol McKinley broke the story)

AP ^ | Friday, December 19, 2003 | AP

[ClintonBeGone]

Remember OJ?

Yeah, I remember. He's playing golf in Florida. So much for this silly theory of yours.

[ClintonBeGone]

Glad to see you admit that the defense is trying this in the media. Is that the way you want justice served, by trying the cases in the media?

The defense is simply responding the the prosecutions dispicable efforts to play this out in the media. I absolutely am in favor of responding to things in the media in this situation. Better that than risk some naive fool on the jury.

[ClintonBeGone]

I certainly hope that people like you that enjoy seeing possible rapists go scot-free without a trial is no where near our judicial system or law enforcement.

Come talk to me when you or your son is walking the fine line between 'possible rapist' and 'convicted rapist'. Lots of tough talk on a website. Most people like you will cower like a baby when the charges are brought against you.

[ClintonBeGone]

It's weak because the alleged victim has has sex before? Glad to see you're backing off the 3 men in 3 days claim and going with what's known that it was a week before. If it's true that she had 3 men in 3 days, you need to prove it.

You may want Sink to prove it, but I'll tell you the defense doesn't have to. You need to appreciate reasonable doubt my friend. Anything else is just naive.

[sinkspur]

It's weak because the alleged victim has has sex before? Glad to see you're backing off the 3 men in 3 days claim and going with what's known that it was a week before. If it's true that she had 3 men in 3 days, you need to prove it.

I'll let Pamela Mackey prove it, since she made the insinuation. She likely can prove it, and will, which will raise doubts about where the "injuries" came from.

There's a difference between being an occasional runner ("having sex before") and a marathoner ("sex with three men in three days"). This girl was world-class.

[#3Fan]

Yeah, I remember. He's playing golf in Florida. So much for this silly theory of yours.

I didn't say it didn't work. I said it's what they go to when there is no defense. That's why Kobots want the trial moved, to get another OJ jury that doesn't care about evidence.

[#3Fan]

The defense is simply responding the the prosecutions dispicable efforts to play this out in the media. I absolutely am in favor of responding to things in the media in this situation. Better that than risk some naive fool on the jury.

Wow, you prefer cases tried in the media. Like I said, I hope you're never in a position of authority.

[#3Fan]

Come talk to me when you or your son is walking the fine line between 'possible rapist' and 'convicted rapist'. Lots of tough talk on a website. Most people like you will cower like a baby when the charges are brought against you.

Seeing as how I don't rape people, it's highly unlikely I'll be charged with rape so don't hold your breath.

[#3Fan]

You may want Sink to prove it, but I'll tell you the defense doesn't have to.

Not to you they don't. For you it's OK for them to tell lies to get a possible rapist off without a trial. You like this trashing of victims.

You need to appreciate reasonable doubt my friend. Anything else is just naive.

What in the world are you talking about?

[#3Fan]

I'll let Pamela Mackey prove it, since she made the insinuation. She likely can prove it, and will, which will raise doubts about where the "injuries" came from.

You shouldn't act like it's true until she proves it. She parsed her words carefully (while at the same time being a sleazoid rumor-monger), so I think it's likely it's not true.

There's a difference between being an occasional runner ("having sex before") and a marathoner ("sex with three men in three days").

Where's your proof she had sex with 3 men in 3 days?

This girl was world-class.

You base your opinion on an unsubstantiated smear campaign by a sleaze lawyer. How fair of you.

[ClintonBeGone]

What in the world are you talking about?

Thanks for proving my point.

[ClintonBeGone]

Not to you they don't. For you it's OK for them to tell lies to get a possible rapist off without a trial. You like this trashing of victims.

As soon as I know for sure who the actual victim is, I'll be happy to join your parade.

Howlin, does this guy's points make any sense to you?

[carpio]

This Libertarian believes that misusing the power of public office to inflict injury on anyone is indefensible.

[mercy]

Don't think there is a gender gap? Just ask ten guys about this trial and then ask ten gals.

Why is the word of one victim against the word of one accused good enough for a conviction in this AND NO OTHER aspect of the law. How can this happen? How can rape be different from every other legal situation?

How can there even BE a trial in this instance? Where are the injuries? Where is the evidence of injury? Where are the other witnesses?

This is no trial. This is a lynching.

[sinkspur]

How can there even BE a trial in this instance? Where are the injuries? Where is the evidence of injury?

There was miniscule evidence of injury to the accuser, but there is definitive proof that she had sex with one, likely two, other men in the same week she encountered Kobe Bryant. So there is reasonable doubt as to who inflicted the injuries.

Where are the other witnesses

She also had sex with the first person she saw after leaving Bryant's room, a week before.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if Pamela Mackey, Bryant's attorney, asks every male witness she cross examines "Did you ever have sex with this woman?", since there seem to be few men in Eagle County who would answer "no."

[#3Fan]

As soon as I know for sure who the actual victim is, I'll be happy to join your parade.

It's too bad you'd rather decide through the liberal media rather than the courtroom.

[ClintonBeGone]

It's too bad you'd rather decide through the liberal media rather than the courtroom.

Based on my statement I think it's clear I haven't decided who the victim is. Its a shame you can't say the same thing.

[Howlin]

Never has; never will. My advice is to do what most of the rest of us do: ignore it.

[#3Fan]

Based on my statement I think it's clear I haven't decided who the victim is. Its a shame you can't say the same thing.

You said the defense should play this in the media. It's clear whose side your taking and you don't care about lies about the alleged victim. Terrible.

[#3Fan]

Never has; never will. My advice is to do what most of the rest of us do: ignore it.

For someone who claims to ignore me, you sure do post about me a lot. And I haven't bothered you at all since our last run-in and here you come and post about me out of the blue. You just can't stand to leave me alone. Do I mean that much to you? lol