Skip to comments.
If Dean loses, will he quit? The Dean third party threat.
Slate ^
| 12/17/03
| Mickey Kaus
Posted on 12/17/2003 10:18:51 AM PST by bdeaner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
I hadn't thought of this scenario before. With Dean as a third party candidate, the Rats would be royally screwed. Looks like they are screwed either way.
1
posted on
12/17/2003 10:18:52 AM PST
by
bdeaner
To: bdeaner
Headline should read:
"If Dean loses, will he quit?"
2
posted on
12/17/2003 10:20:03 AM PST
by
bdeaner
To: bdeaner
Maybe he'll quit and be quite quiet.
3
posted on
12/17/2003 10:20:29 AM PST
by
Consort
To: bdeaner
He should quietly quite.
4
posted on
12/17/2003 10:21:24 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
(Madeline Halfbright claims we have OBL on ice ready for display before election??!)
To: 1Old Pro
He's quite an idiot.
5
posted on
12/17/2003 10:22:00 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(New Ben and Jerry's flavor - Howard Dean Swirl - no ice cream, just fruit at bottom)
To: bdeaner
Perhaps he and buchanan could start their own party and run as co-presidents.
6
posted on
12/17/2003 10:23:39 AM PST
by
CWOJackson
(President Bush is responsibile for cellulite...)
To: bdeaner
I had not quit thought about this. Do you think he is series?
To: bdeaner
Dean is going to quite? This is Hugh!!! Wahta a maroon.
8
posted on
12/17/2003 10:27:01 AM PST
by
massadvj
To: 11th Earl of Mar
It doesn't matter if Dean leaves for the Greens or stays a democrat. If he loses the nomination, his followers will not vote for Gephardt or Kerry. They will, like RFK's followers in 1968, simply stay home or vote for the Green candidate as a sour grapes maneuver.
To: Consort
Quite while your ahead.
10
posted on
12/17/2003 10:32:22 AM PST
by
Huck
To: dighton; Lazamataz
Whiners never quite and quiters never whine.
11
posted on
12/17/2003 10:35:03 AM PST
by
Constitution Day
(Iraqi blogger to President Bush: "The bones in the mass graves salute you, Avenger of the Bones.")
To: bdeaner
a fluid two-party system in which the #2, or even #1 banner is up for grabs every election, to be captured by one of several competing self-started Internet-organized groups that may not even have existed the year before.I'm sorry, but this is crap. There is nothing special about the Internet at all when it comes to politics, except that it makes information dissemination a bit easier. There is no reason whatsoever that Dean couldn't have accomplished what he did without using the Internet much at all. Besides, if anything, it was the Iraq war that made him the frontrunner, because it allowed him to tap into the steaming pile of far-left hatred that was stirred up by our major military success (a pile of hatred that makes up almost all of the Democratic Party base these days). If there hadn't been a war, Dean would be little more than an angrier Dennis Kucinich. Does anyone here seriously believe that Howard Dean became HOWARD DEAN because he made himself look cool to a bunch of semi-literate college students "cause he's online dude and the others aren't!"? Please.
By the way, anyone that's done any serious poking around on Dean's "Internet presence" has discovered that, in large measure, it doesn't exist. Yes, many mailing lists were created, many Meetup gatherings are constantly scheduled. But what you're never told is that 98.5% of those mailing lists are dormant, have less than ten subscribers each, or both; and that the vast majority of those Meetups have about five people show up, when anyone shows at all. (Anyone can create a "gathering" on the Meetup site. It doesn't mean a single person will actually sign up, much less show up, but you can be sure it will be counted in the Dean statistics regardless.) Even the emails and cell phone text messages from Dean HQ have slowed to a trickle. It was all a front to suck in donations. It's served its purpose and will now largely be abandoned as he focuses on winning Iowa and New Hampshire, where the voters expect to meet the candidates in person, not via a webcam.
To: bdeaner
Tuogh crowd, eh? ;^)
13
posted on
12/17/2003 10:39:02 AM PST
by
eureka!
(Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
To: eureka!
This is hugh....even series
14
posted on
12/17/2003 10:43:58 AM PST
by
spokeshave
(TDIDS = The Dow is Driving Skyward = Tom Daschle is Deeply Saddened)
To: spokeshave
vey series...
15
posted on
12/17/2003 10:44:52 AM PST
by
eureka!
(Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
To: bdeaner
He might quit, but I doubt he'll be quiet.
16
posted on
12/17/2003 10:46:14 AM PST
by
rintense
To: bdeaner
If Dean loses the first three or four primaries, it will be quite difficult or him to win the nomination. If he loses six he is finished. Both parties design their primaries this way, specifically to keep maverick independent candidates out, and candidates who favor the party elite in. That is why this Dean thing is so surprising. His is a solely grassroots phenomenon, which both parties have tried to stamp out.
It might be, as another poster pointed out, the Democrats Goldwater. He may lose, but will become the face of the Democrat Party within 10 years.
To: eureka!
Tuogh crowd, eh? ;^)
Quite. ;^)
18
posted on
12/17/2003 10:47:55 AM PST
by
bdeaner
To: massadvj
quite it or i'm gonna loose it.
To: eureka!
Give this pore guy a brak. Everyone misspels a werd or to.
20
posted on
12/17/2003 10:49:45 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Dean People Suck!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson