Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pa. high court refuses to hear case to save Saha family's Chesco farm
Pilly.com ^ | Today? | AP

Posted on 12/15/2003 9:20:29 PM PST by Michael Barnes

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: unix
I live next to Coatesville. A 60 million dollar recreational facility will fail there. It's insane. Coatesville used to be a nice place. Now it is where most law abiding people fear to tread. 60 million won't help.
21 posted on 12/15/2003 9:59:32 PM PST by abner (In search of a witty tag line... found it! http://www.intelmemo.com < go there or be square!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Yes, salt the land so it is useless for 100 years.

Why not? It WOULD have been their choice if gov't didn't come in and tell them "the Gubbmint knows best for you".

22 posted on 12/15/2003 10:02:20 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ikka
I'm surprised the city leaders didn't plan drugs somewhere on the property and seize it that way.

If they needed the property for a road that's one thing but a golf couse... #$@%*&!

23 posted on 12/15/2003 10:03:54 PM PST by Taylor42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: abner
I'll have to trust your word abner..I don't have a dog in this hunt (never seen the property, jsut found out about it tonight). But, CAN say, I see what usual PA local councils do in the communties. Spend LAVISH amounts, and it adds up to nothing. Hell, Murphy in Pittsburgh want(s/ed) to cut funding to fire/police/etc, yet let a multi-million dolar "frisbee park" go funded..

Frisbe park????? Shit, 5 months out of the year, it'll be un-usable.

My area, echoe's of "we may be short of salt and a plow or two." Community, "Ha..Try it, and try your luck in the private sector next cycle".

24 posted on 12/15/2003 10:07:26 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: unix
Gee why don't they outlaw single family homes and mandate condos? It will enlarge the tax base. (/s)
25 posted on 12/15/2003 10:12:33 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Taylor42
I'm surprised the city leaders didn't plan drugs somewhere on the property and seize it that way.

My mother-in-law had an 1/8 acre eminant domained off her. Private development none the less.

Don't think for a second they don't do financials of those their getting readyto go up against.

My brother-in-law and I are going to CLEAR ALL the old growth trees for my burner. It's actually very dense tree wise. Be damned if a private developer is gonna get that good wood and put it out on the market..My burner is gonna be hungry next season..

26 posted on 12/15/2003 10:12:58 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Gee why don't they outlaw single family homes and mandate condos? It will enlarge the tax base. (/s)

I had a good mind to hit the abuse button on you! YOUR giving them ideas damnit!!!

;-)

27 posted on 12/15/2003 10:15:02 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Gonna hit it folks..have a flight in the morning...

Please keep this bumped up?

Later

28 posted on 12/15/2003 10:16:19 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: unix
too late, we have real estate agents buying up single family homes from suckers. They then turn around and make these MONOTONOUS mini townhome associations consisting of 4 to 8 units where there were once as few as two homes.

They rezone from single family to medium density. Never mind that it is destroying the single family home nature of a neighborhood. However, they say the tax base is growing for now. Wait untill they can't unload the condos.
29 posted on 12/15/2003 10:21:05 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: unix; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.

Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.

30 posted on 12/15/2003 11:18:26 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!
31 posted on 12/16/2003 3:05:05 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: unix; countrydummy; farmfriend; hellinahandcart
There should be more restrictions on eminent domain than this.

I can see eminent domain for doing things such as putting in a new road or sewer line or something like that, but not for city "revitalization."

Wonder how many of the city fathers have their hand in the developer's pocket?

32 posted on 12/16/2003 4:39:14 AM PST by sauropod (I believe Tawana! Sharpton for Prez! Slap the Donkey or Spank the Monkey? Your Choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unix
As the Supremes just killed the First Amendment, what the heck? Why not the fifth as well?
33 posted on 12/16/2003 5:03:32 AM PST by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
City officials have said the plan would allow the Sahas to retain the small corner of the property that contains their home, a 250-year-old farmhouse that they rebuilt.

Well, that's very big of them. What do they propose the Sahas do with their horses?

There should be more restrictions on eminent domain than this.

Way more. There's a big difference between "public need", "public want", "city officials' whim", and "developer's financial interest". Now they're even grasping out of their jurisdiction.

This has got to stop.

34 posted on 12/16/2003 5:22:00 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Le Ping!
35 posted on 12/16/2003 5:47:32 AM PST by sauropod (I believe Tawana! Sharpton for Prez! Slap the Donkey or Spank the Monkey? Your Choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: unix; Kay Ludlow
THEY NEED TO GET IN TOUCH WITH WELDON, GRAB EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE INCLUDING NOTES FROM MEETINGS, PUT TOGETHER A POINT BY POINT BRIEF, AND HAVE WELDON LEAD A DELEGATION DIRECTLY TO JOHN ASHCROFT and ask for an immediate investigation. THIS SMELLS LIKE ROTTEN FISH.
Stash copies of this stuff everywhere and go for a federal case based on Civil Rights, ie., denied due process under the law.
It sounds like a DNC takeover of a small town, or maybe even a Muslim enclave desirous of that land. Either way, there is way too much money involved here for a small town with only 11,000 people.
36 posted on 12/16/2003 6:37:35 AM PST by Nix 2 (http://www.warroom.com QUINN AND ROSE IN THE AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: unix
Do I live in America anymore? someone get hold of
FOX news national and get someone cracking this story. This is the worst!
37 posted on 12/16/2003 7:21:26 AM PST by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta; Temple Owl; Tribune7
Didn't see you fellas on this thread ping...
 
(Trib, this might deserve a PA ping).

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

38 posted on 12/16/2003 8:58:24 AM PST by End Times Sentinel ("You white rednecks... this is what my momma taught me!"- Nathaniel Jones Former Cincinnati Resident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unix; TheStickman; visualops; carenot; exodus
This is baliant abuse of eminent domain, at it's best! What are these folks recourse if they are refused to be heard by a higher court? Is the court system not set up to protect form abuses and improper laws??? As well as it's other functions?

Now how are they going to judge "fair market value" when there is no one else willingly to touch the proper except the township??? And they will condemn it and take it!

39 posted on 12/16/2003 9:05:03 AM PST by countrydummy (http://chat.agitator.dynip.com/ You will love the chat room!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unix
Isn't this part of why we had a revolution in the first place, because we didn't want a king running our lives?
This sounds pretty feudal to me.
40 posted on 12/16/2003 9:18:16 AM PST by visualops
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson