Skip to comments.
Canada raises Iraq contracts with Bush, no results
Reuters ^
| 12/15/03
Posted on 12/15/2003 1:42:16 PM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: areafiftyone
Isn't Martin a much different person than the Cretin? Maybe we should give him a chance.
2
posted on
12/15/2003 1:44:26 PM PST
by
samtheman
To: areafiftyone
"The president thanked Canada for its contributions to Iraq and indicated that we would keep open the lines of communication," Translation: "If we need any hockey pucks or funny round bacon, we'll call you."
3
posted on
12/15/2003 1:45:18 PM PST
by
TheBigB
(Just because you talk slower...doesn't mean your thoughts are any deeper...)
To: samtheman
Canada is unhappy the White House has limited bidding on the contracts to companies from nations that contributed troops to the war on Iraq. Chretien, whose relations with Bush were never better than cool, angered the U.S. leader by refusing to take part. To spite the fact that this keeps getting reported, it is not true. The contracts are allow for country's who simply offered moral support for (did not actively oppose) the war.
To: areafiftyone
I think any attempt to change the administrations mind on this is futile. Not just Canada but other countries who didn't support the war should have known that there would be consequences of this nature. ...open to accusations from the surging left-wing New Democrats that he was trying to ingratiate himself with Bush.
Last I checked the New Democrats had barely 10% support. That's hardly "surging". After Ontario had experience with these far-left socialists, they will never form a national government.
5
posted on
12/15/2003 1:50:07 PM PST
by
SB00
The profit margin is much higher in
subcontracts than in contracts.
Canadian subcontrators are not barred from the loot; the contract ban was just a political statement from President Bush.
The Canadian prime minister is just politicking.
To: samtheman
Not really, no.
To: The_Victor
Has anyone seen the list of exactly which countries are approved? I have heard the criteria described, I have never seen the list itself.
And Canada...its not too late...you could commit troops to help out in Iraq now. What's that? You have no troops left because you have disarmed and are relying on America for your national defence?
To: samtheman
Martin is as "different" from Chretien as Clinton was to Gore.
Martin is just as liberal as Chretien except Martin is not outwardly anti-American.
9
posted on
12/15/2003 1:53:08 PM PST
by
SB00
To: samtheman
Geez....that's quite a phone call...I want this, and this, and this, and this, and this.....and also this. I think he better ease up a bit or probably won't get anything.
10
posted on
12/15/2003 1:55:18 PM PST
by
rs79bm
(Insert Democratic principles and ideals here: .............this space intentionally left blank.....)
To: areafiftyone
It would certainly be a slap in the face to our allies that did support us, and to the American taxpayer to give Canada a pass after their tacky attitude and their continued resistance to border security.
This is the same nation that sued us over gasoline additives.
To: SB00
Liberals in Canadian-French clothing are easy to spot.
Liberals in Canadian-Anglo clothing not to easy. They may be more dangerous.
To: All
I think Paul Martin will have to work his way through to changing Bush's mind and I honestly believe he will be able to do so. Martin has owned a huge steamship business which I believe he has turned over to his sons and is well versed in global diplomacy as well as economics and trade. I am giving the guy a "chance" which is more than the Canadians ever gave George Bush.
I believe Bush is still giving "pay back" for the ballet dancer Chretien, and will have none of it again from Canada and their dilettante parliament members who looked down upon our president as a lesser man, while they worshipped the confabulator Clinton. They don't seem to think beyond the political affiliation into the man behind the job believing what the man "says" not what he "does".
I hope one day George Bush will find a common ground and basis for cooperation with this new man, if anything to put Chretien's long nose out of joint!!!
13
posted on
12/15/2003 1:58:36 PM PST
by
MAGEE
To: george wythe
The Canadian prime minister is just politicking.I'm sure our president is politicking, too. He'll wait 'til all the good contracts are snapped up by Americans and our real allies, then, in a magnanimous gesture to 'bury the hatchet once and for all', open the bidding up for the leftovers and crumbs.
14
posted on
12/15/2003 2:01:51 PM PST
by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: areafiftyone
They speak a lot of French in Canada...
15
posted on
12/15/2003 2:07:50 PM PST
by
Wheee The People
(If this post doesn't make any sense, then it also doubles as a bump.)
To: samtheman
I bet Bush has studied the guy, read a file all about him already.
He is playing poker and might toss him some crumbs later if he acts right.
To: areafiftyone
Canada needs to get rid of the French agenda, commonly known as Communism.
Ops4 God BLess America
17
posted on
12/15/2003 2:21:06 PM PST
by
OPS4
To: No Blue States
I think Martin is closer to Bush in personality than that jerk wannabe Parisien party animal.
Seems to me Bush and Martin might just hit upon a good solid and respectful friendship which might be excellent in repairing some of the damage Martin's predecessor managed to do in a very short time after 9/11.
18
posted on
12/15/2003 2:21:45 PM PST
by
MAGEE
To: blanknoone
Canada has troops in Afghanistan, and pledged something like $300 million towards Iraq at the Madrid donor conference. Many of countries seen as "supporting" the war in Iraq did not send troops.
19
posted on
12/15/2003 2:26:23 PM PST
by
CalKat
To: areafiftyone
I just keep thinking about those Canadian debates we all were watching on C-Span before the war. I bet President Bush was watching too.
20
posted on
12/15/2003 2:29:38 PM PST
by
lawnguy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson