Aww, le's not burn her straight off. Le's see if she weighs as much as a duck first. Then we'll burn 'er!
Posted on 12/09/2003 6:30:09 PM PST by kanawa
I certainly do not believe that the Christmas tree was erected with the intention of sending that message, and I understand that some non-Christians did not take that message from the display of the tree.
This one statement only serves to prove that this woman is a complete @$$hol€.
She admits that she is wrong but complained until the tree was removed. Classic a-holery.
Get the net. This witch thinks that trees talk to her and her friends.
Isn't the "yule tree" actually an artifact of pre-Christian pagan religion? It has zero zip nada nichevo to do with Christianity.
You know what really, really, really offends me? "Jingle Bells" sung jazz style. It makes me want to run screaming through the mall knocking people over. OTOH, I really like Christmas songs, even the religious hymns, sung by country stars like Toby Keith or Randy Travis, but these singers have an effect on other people that the "Jingle Bells" jazz scat crap has on me.
Diversity means conservative viewpoints are outlawed, gay means sodomy, marriage means two men practicing sodomy, beautiful rainbows mean sodomy, tolerance means fisting clubs but no prayer, the Second Amendment means atheism is the state religion, family means two lesbians, a dog and a turkey baster, freedom of speech means freedom as long as it agrees with them (like any color of car is fine as long as it's black), and republican form of government means judicial oligarchy. It's a new translation.
But she doesn't mind (maybe is even happy about it) that CHRISTIANS are offended. Or even people of other religions who happen to be glad that someone is worshipping God even in a different way!
This stupid letter doesn't even say if the law atrium could have had displays honoring other religious holidays if people had wanted them there. She says there were no other displays - was that because they weren't allowed or no one bothered?
Never mind the net, get the faggots and the stake. lol
I must of missed the expressions 'freedom of discussion' and 'freedom of belief' in the Constitution but I did notice this...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Maybe there's some fine print that says,'only if no one is offended'.
If whomever was responsible for the display had ignored her, would they actually be liable to criminal charges? And if not why are they letting themselves be pushed around by her and 'others' (Can't help but wonder if these others are of the 'convert all infidels or kill them' persuasion).
Note she says,"...my principal objection is one of policy, not law."
Aww, le's not burn her straight off. Le's see if she weighs as much as a duck first. Then we'll burn 'er!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.