Skip to comments.
Surprise! Guess Who Originated "Pre-Emption" Policy?
http://www.chuckmuth.com ^
| December 7, 2001
| Chuck Muth
Posted on 12/07/2003 9:53:30 AM PST by jigsaw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
12/07/2003 9:53:32 AM PST
by
jigsaw
To: jigsaw
I note that the above came in Muth's emailed "News & Views" Newsletter.
2
posted on
12/07/2003 9:55:29 AM PST
by
jigsaw
(God Bless Our Troops.)
To: jigsaw
It didn't begin with FDR.
Our entire western expansion was pre-emptive, beginning with Jefferson's Louisiana purchase. Polk's Mexican war was a particularly good example. So was our annexation of Hawaii.
See also the Monroe Doctrine.
To: liberallarry
Yeah I was thinking Monroe Doctrine myself, as well as the way we solved the problems with the Barbary pirates. Pre-emption is the foundation of American foreign policy.
4
posted on
12/07/2003 10:11:16 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(The U.N. is a terrorist organization)
To: jigsaw
The Franklin quote is useful research.
Jefferson
TO THE SECRETARY OF WAR. (HENRY DEARBORN.)
MONTICELLO, August 28, 1807.
"... we wish them to live in peace with all nations as well as with us, and we have no intention ever to strike them or to do them an injury of any sort, unless first attacked or threatened; but that learning that some of them meditate war on us, we too are preparing for war against those, and those only who shall seek it; and that if ever we are constrained to lift the hatchet against any tribe, we will never lay it down till that tribe is exterminated, or driven beyond the Mississippi. ...it will be a subject for consideration whether, on satisfactory evidence that any tribe means to strike us, we shall not anticipate by giving them the first blow..."
I think there's a few pre-emptive wars in the Old Testament too.
5
posted on
12/07/2003 10:14:16 AM PST
by
mrsmith
To: jigsaw
And what about when terrorists hit Kenya and Tanzania, and Clinton preemptively struck Sudan and Afghanistan?
6
posted on
12/07/2003 10:17:46 AM PST
by
firebrand
To: jigsaw
I believe that is 60 years prior to 9/11, not 50 years.
So9
7
posted on
12/07/2003 10:24:10 AM PST
by
Servant of the 9
(Screwing the Inscrutable: or is that Scruting the Inscrewable?)
To: jigsaw
Bump
8
posted on
12/07/2003 10:25:41 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: jigsaw
At any rate, the doctrine of pre-emption didn't originate in the Bush administration. It was a policy adopted and implemented exactly 50 years, to the day, before the September 11 al Qaeda attacks on U.S. citizens. I think he means 60 years.
9
posted on
12/07/2003 10:49:05 AM PST
by
HIDEK6
To: jigsaw
In a Fireside Chat on - and you're not going to believe the coincidence of this date - September 11, 1941, FDR told the nation, "When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him."
Hmmmm. Response, Mr. Dean? Rep. Gephardt? Sen. Edwards? Sen. Kerry? Rep. Kucinich? Rev. Sharpton? Their response is the same as Pat Buchanan's-- Iraq wasn't a rattlesnake. It was more like a worm snake. You'll never convince them that Iraq was a threat to anyone. As long as they deny the threat, you've lost the argument.
10
posted on
12/07/2003 11:14:53 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("He's got to win in '04. No one else can prosecute this war like he can."- Cpt. J. Morrison, Baghdad)
To: liberallarry
Our entire western expansion was pre-emptive, beginning with Jefferson's Louisiana purchase.
Could not agree more, and how fortuitous it was .
The Monrow Doctrine served the US and its neighbors pretty well too. Good points. I do think it'd be a lovely learning experience to bounce the FDR quote of the dwarves and Hillary!
11
posted on
12/07/2003 11:24:14 AM PST
by
gatorbait
(Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
To: jigsaw
Under international law all nations have a legal right to "anticipatory self-defense". This right was also incorporated into the UN Charter, article 51 if my memory is right.
Having said that, The current use and justification for pre-emption, commonly called the Bush Doctrine, actually is found in the Hart-Rudman Commission Report aka Road Map to the 21st Century. It is found in the Phase 2 Report which was released in the spring of 2000.
To: Ben Ficklin
all nations have a legal right to "anticipatory self-defense". "In June l967, we had a choice. The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him." -- Menachem Begin in The New York Times, August 21, 1982
To: MosesKnows
Yes, there are numerous examples. Another would be the bombing of the Iraqi reactor. Japan claimed it in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
All nations and especially western democracies have shied away from anticipatory self defense because it is hard to prove and can create problems with the media and citizens. As the above article points out, Roosevelt was speaking in a Fireside Chat so he wasn't building a legal justification but manufacturing consent of the citizens.
To: jigsaw
Iraq violated the Gulf War Treaty and every United Nations resolution. On top of that, Sadaam Hussein plotted to assasinate the former President of the United States on a visit to Kuwait.
The only thing wrong with President GWB's policy is that he had to develop and implement it. We should have had a President with the balls to do it 10 years previously.
15
posted on
12/07/2003 1:56:32 PM PST
by
Ghengis
To: jigsaw
Article just appeare at FrontPageMag.com:
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=11190 "In a Fireside Chat on - and you're not going to believe the coincidence of this date - September 11, 1941, FDR told the nation, "When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him."
Hmmmm. Response, Mr. Dean? Rep. Gephardt? Sen. Edwards? Sen. Kerry? Rep. Kucinich? Rev. Sharpton?"
To: MosesKnows
I thought Nasser blockaded Israel's southern port. That's an act of war, isn't it?
17
posted on
12/13/2003 4:14:12 AM PST
by
wizardoz
To: jigsaw
This nation cannot nor should tolerate those who seek to destroy our very culture be it through religion or guerilla tactics here or in any other country.
Mr. Dean? Rep. Gephardt? Sen. Edwards? Sen. Kerry? Rep. Kucinich? Rev. Sharpton? Why would you seek votes from those who would destroy you in a heart beat? Shouldnt you be more interested in protecting America than appeasing our enemies? Your rhetoric has done little to dissuade them and much to encourage them. It is time to step up to the plate and show your courage by standing behind this courageous President, your President. Politics be damned! America is at WAR, quit ading and abetting our enemies.
18
posted on
12/13/2003 5:53:34 AM PST
by
yoe
(Mrs. Clinton's heart is rumored to be as big as a Caraway Seed, but I think that is an exaggeration.)
To: jigsaw
ALL,aiding and abetting........sorry
19
posted on
12/13/2003 5:57:36 AM PST
by
yoe
(Mrs. Clinton's heart is rumored to be as big as a Caraway Seed, but I think that is an exaggeration.)
To: jigsaw
Preemption goes back to at least Lincoln at Fort Sumter. But it becomes really prominent with Cuba (The Berlin Policy was one of preemption, too) in 1961 with the Kennedy administration. LBJ can also be thrown into that mix with Vietnam. I would consider putting Truman in the mix with his dealings in Iran, too. Preemption is not a new concept. We need to destroy the liberals' saying of "worst economy since Hoover..."(LBJ/Carter)
20
posted on
12/13/2003 6:32:32 AM PST
by
sboyd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson