Skip to comments.
Janklow Cries While Testifying on Crash
The Argus Leader ^
| Dec. 07, 2003
| By CARSON WALKER
Posted on 12/07/2003 8:42:38 AM PST by Sockdologer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Paul Atreides
God Almight,I've got to get up pretty early!!!!!!!
To: sgtbono2002
Hey, I can't drive I've been 6 months seizure free now. Feb 5 is my date.
The real problem was that instead of getting treatment the first time, the cops threw me in jail for DUI. I got out, not knowing what happened, and then a few months later had another one.
This better cop took me to the hospital instead.
22
posted on
12/07/2003 9:42:08 AM PST
by
Monty22
To: martin_fierro
Looks like Janklow is going with the best fig-leaf he (and his lawyer) can construct.
I wasn't defending Janklow in a previous thread.
He knew he'd had a propensity for bad/dangerous driving from over the years
and he knew his health problems.
He didn't take the rational steps to prevent this tragedy. Who knows what
the court will do, but it sounds like he's guilty of killing this poor guy
at least by willfully ignoring his (Janklow's) medical condition and not
correcting his driving behaviour.
23
posted on
12/07/2003 9:48:12 AM PST
by
VOA
To: Sockdologer
" . . . responded "I don't know" or "I don't recall" to many of his lawyer's questions . . . "
Ah ha! The Clinton defense!!
To: Sockdologer
Has there been testimony by the cop on the scene? He should be able to state if Janklow appeared to be suffering from low blood sugar.
Oh wait, I can see it now: immediately after the incident Janklow drank a coke erasing any signs of low blood sugar.
25
posted on
12/07/2003 10:28:07 AM PST
by
lelio
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: DustyMoment
The so-called Janklow defense seems to me to be an argument for leniency in the sentence. Perhaps he is hoping for a suspended sentence instead of jail time, along with permanent revocation of his license, and some kind of restitution to the victim (it this possible in a criminal case).
Because of his prior history, however, he cannot hope for the typical sentence a first-time offender might get. A sentence of ten years, all but one or two of which can be suspended, seems in order.
This "I forgot to regulate my blood sugar level" is not acceptable. People with conditions MUST take care of themselves so as to enjoy the Liberties of free men and women, such as operating a motor vehicle, owning a gun, buying and selling property, consenting to medical procedures (and I could go on and on).
Given his admission, it is now obvious that he should have resigned his seat in Congress so as to allow the Governor of the state to call a special election.
We ARE NOT Democrats, who look over such matters as in the case of the real Neanderthal of the U.S. Senate, Ted Kennedy. We HOLD our leaders to a higher, but still reasonable level of personal accountability.
To: martin_fierro
Justice for all.
28
posted on
12/07/2003 11:11:57 AM PST
by
blackie
To: Redmen4ever
"We HOLD our leaders to a higher, but still reasonable level of personal accountability."
Do you REALLY believe that? How many opportunities have there been to indict and try Teddy Chappaquiddick for the murder of Mary Jo? How many opportunities to indict and try BJC for rape, theft and malfeasance?
Hopefully, Janklow will be convicted and will serve time in prison, where he belongs. I'm betting that the jury of incompetents will buy one of his stories and let him off to do this again.
I agree that our elected reps SHOULD be held to a higher standard, jst as ANY public figure (including atheletes, actors and musicians). But, the track record is NOT encouraging.
BTW - I'm a diabetic and I don't buy his low blood sugar defense.
To: Sockdologer
The guy has a long history of driving like a bat out of hell and a traffic offense record that would get anyone dropped from their insurance in an instant. He is driving a car "given" to him by a friend with illegal concealed flashing lights and a siren and makes a 175 mile trip in a little over two hours making an intermediate stop on the way.
He then has the audacity to claim he was impaired by a health condition and doesn't remember driving.
Add to this that he nearly killed a family by speeding and running a stop sign at this exact same intersection some months before and was apprehended by a sheriff's deputy while clocked going 84 mph
The man is a menace to society and ought to have his license to drive permanently revoked at the very least. Representing me in Congress?--the guy is an obvious idiot to engage in such behavior not to mention boast about doing it--resign. Guilty of manslaughter--it would take me less than 2 minutes to return that verdict. Send him to jail.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson