Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi army chief backs WMD claim
Associated Press ^ | 12/6/03 | Associated Press

Posted on 12/06/2003 5:24:19 PM PST by Mark Felton

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2003 5:24:20 PM PST by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
How the heck is the AP going to bury this???
2 posted on 12/06/2003 5:27:05 PM PST by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demsux
They report it once on a Saturday and never mention it again.
3 posted on 12/06/2003 5:29:02 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Hmmm. Could this be the big one?
4 posted on 12/06/2003 5:30:14 PM PST by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
"I am the one responsible for providing this information," he was quoted as saying. "It is 100 per cent accurate.

"Forget 45 minutes, we could have fired these within half an hour," Col al-Dabbagh added. He said the weapons were not used because most of the Iraqi army did not want to fight for Saddam."

===

Can someone read this to Daschle, the rest of the Dems and the Brits who attacked Blair? Will they all apologize to Bush and Blair?

5 posted on 12/06/2003 5:31:16 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Will this be featured in a "very special 48 hours" with Dan Rather ?
6 posted on 12/06/2003 5:34:40 PM PST by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton; Pokey78
The original UK Telegraph article, to which this AP article is referring to, is posted here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1035385/posts
7 posted on 12/06/2003 5:37:25 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Liberals will try to bury this as fast as Saddam buried his own people.
8 posted on 12/06/2003 5:40:11 PM PST by armymarinemom (I Rocked the Cradle of Death from Above)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"Can someone read this to Daschle, the rest of the Dems and the Brits who attacked Blair?"

To heck with reading this to Daschle et al...I want to hear Russert and Steffy ask HILLARY CLINTON about it on the Sunday talk shows!!! I think she's scheduled to be on all three in the morning (NBC,ABC,CBS). Of course not FOX...whadda you think...she's a dummy?!?


9 posted on 12/06/2003 5:41:18 PM PST by Maria S ("…the end is near…this time, Americans are serious; Bush is not like Clinton." Uday Hussein 4/9/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom
What we need, is to get that Iraqi general to come on FoxNews.

====

"When I asked him whether the information in the document relating to the 45-minute issue was 100 per cent accurate, he responded with characteristic Iraqi enthusiasm: "It is 200 per cent accurate!" he exclaimed. "And forget 45 minutes. We could have fired them within half an hour."

The weapons themselves were finally deployed at his own unit towards the end of last year. "They arrived in boxes marked 'Made in Iraq' and looked like something you fired with a rocket-propelled grenade," Lt Col al-Dabbagh explained.

"They were either chemical or biological weapons; I don't know which, because only the Fedayeen and the Special Republican Guard were allowed to use them. All I know is that we were told that when we used these weapons we had to wear gas masks."

He believes that the only reason these weapons were not used during Operation Iraqi Freedom last spring is that the bulk of the Iraqi army refused to fight for Saddam.

"The West should thank God that the Iraqi army decided not to fight," he said. "If the army had fought for Saddam, and used these weapons, there would have been terrible consequences."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1035385/posts

The UK Telegraph article has much more detail, very interesting.

10 posted on 12/06/2003 5:45:09 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
I never doubted this and all the other evidence that brought us to war. It is just a matter of time for the truth to finally come out. It won't make any difference to the Bush-bashers, though.
11 posted on 12/06/2003 5:45:52 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
Maria S, this is not a scheduled part of the questions, not pre-approved. Forget it.
12 posted on 12/06/2003 5:46:22 PM PST by AGreatPer (Hillary will be drafted. Period. There ain't nothing else. If she looses, she wins recognition,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
And that's why the Iraqi frontline troops had all those chemical suits, etc. Why is this so hard for lib dems and the media to understand?
13 posted on 12/06/2003 5:55:00 PM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
So where are the WMD? They still pose a danger then and the war did not remove the threat-just spread it around.
14 posted on 12/06/2003 5:58:13 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"So where are the WMD?"

===

Syria.
15 posted on 12/06/2003 5:59:38 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
So why is Bush endangering my life by not invading Syria?
16 posted on 12/06/2003 6:00:43 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
So why is Bush endangering my life by not invading Syria?
17 posted on 12/06/2003 6:00:44 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"So why is Bush endangering my life by not invading Syria?"

==

My guess is that he would have already done it, if the Dems would support the WoT, instead of obstructing it, by their constant attacks on Bush.
18 posted on 12/06/2003 6:07:44 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Destro
oops in Syria there are no WMD eighter. Sorry. Maybe it's in Iran. Lets go there!!!
19 posted on 12/06/2003 6:11:04 PM PST by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Faraday
Hmmm. Could this be the big one?

The leftist press has already established the "fact" that any Iraqi who was cooperating with U.S. or British Intelligence cannot be trusted. Look back at the stories and the comments of the major media talking heads. This one will be tossed on the garbage heap by the media as not even worthy of consideration. DOA in my opinion despite the fact that it is 99% probable that it is the truth.

20 posted on 12/06/2003 6:16:48 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson