Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruel Joke or Medical Anomaly?
UM List ^ | Tim Wilkins

Posted on 12/05/2003 5:50:56 AM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 381-397 next last
To: little jeremiah
Well, it all depends on how the arrogance is displayed and acted upon. Actually, even then, same sex sodomy trumps arrogance as a character defect.

I don't know what you are on, but arrogance has lead to more human suffering throughout human history than anything else. Tell that to the victims of Julius Caesar, Nero, Caligula, Napoleon, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, the Clintons; yes some of these people had homosexual leanings, but most of them didn't.

321 posted on 12/06/2003 4:47:51 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
You still didn't anwer my two questions. Arrogance when acted on to an extreme degree leads to other evils such as the evils indulged in by the people on your list. Additionally, most of them had other character defects besides plain arrogance which contributed to their evil acts.

Everyone in the world (just about) has some degree of arrogance. Still can't be compared to an act. It's a state of mind.

In case you forgot, here's the two questions I asked which you haven't answered yet:

And what is your definition of "help"?

1. You must know that scripter's links to help for homosexuals means help to overcome or heal their same sex desires. Why do you pretend that you don't know what help for homosexuals means?

2. Why don't you state your position on homosexuality? Do you consider same sex acts morally neutral, healthy and good, immoral, unhealthy, or what? Or are you confused and trying to figure it out? Where on the spectrum do you stand? If you aren't honest, then there's no point in trying to have an honest conversation or debate about it.

322 posted on 12/06/2003 4:55:16 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
You seem to forget that I did not ask the first question. So you shouldn't have butted in.
323 posted on 12/06/2003 5:42:43 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
You seem to forget that I did not ask YOU the first question. So you shouldn't have butted in.
324 posted on 12/06/2003 5:42:59 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Everyone in the world (just about) has some degree of arrogance. Still can't be compared to an act. It's a state of mind.

That is pure BS, surely you know about modesty.

325 posted on 12/06/2003 5:43:44 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
And what is your definition of "help"?

Farewell for now.

326 posted on 12/06/2003 6:16:42 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Time wasters and game players are coming out of the woodwork of late...
327 posted on 12/06/2003 6:44:44 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise; scripter; EdReform
I think it's sort of like ones dietary choices.

In Korea nearly everyone ate dog. They liked it. But they had learned that dog was perfectly acceptable food. It was a means of relieving hunger that they accepted in their pantheon of food choices.

The same with homosexuality. At some point, every homosexual had a first homosexual experience. Like with eating dog, that was an introduction to a particular means of relieving their sexual urges. Since it worked once and brought about the desire result, they are then more likely to repeat that behavior in subsequent instances when they wish to relieve themselves sexually.
328 posted on 12/06/2003 6:44:47 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
The orderlies are coming for you now, it's medication time and then beddy-bye!
329 posted on 12/06/2003 7:01:01 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: scripter
When people can't carry on a debate followind some basic rules, it is definitely a waste of time to participate in their hallucinations!
330 posted on 12/06/2003 7:04:16 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE
Thanks for the ping!
331 posted on 12/06/2003 8:13:58 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I noticed this particular clown may have finally realized his error with my post 279 because he never responded to it. Maybe more prevalent and less prevalent and a little logic finally sunk in. When xzins made the point this clown said to butt out. Should have seen the clown for what he was at that time. Time wasters and game players indeed.
332 posted on 12/06/2003 9:13:51 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Revelation 911; xzins
I just realized something. This clown that keeps telling folks to butt out butted in himself with Rev 911 in post 9. While it's perfectly fine to butt in on this forum, it's rather inconsistent to tell others to butt out when you're butting in.
333 posted on 12/06/2003 9:29:39 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: scripter
If someone is discussing on a thread and tells someone to butt out, they should be Freepmailing instead. This thread is a party line!
334 posted on 12/06/2003 10:16:14 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
When people can't carry on a debate followind some basic rules, it is definitely a waste of time to participate in their hallucinations!

This from someone who thinks that homosexuality is worse than pride, the deadliest of the seven mortal sins.

335 posted on 12/06/2003 10:18:48 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: scripter
And you consider someone asking you questions to be to extreme.
336 posted on 12/06/2003 10:20:04 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Pride is the source of homosexual acts. Why? Because same sex acts are forbidden in the OT, the NT, the Koran, and the Vedas, they are unhealthy, unnatural and destructive. So somone who wants to rebel against nature and nature's God is acting out of pride.

BTW you didn't answer my questions, so goodbye and good luck!
337 posted on 12/06/2003 10:43:01 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Pride is the source of homosexual acts. Why? Because same sex acts are forbidden in the OT, the NT, the Koran, and the Vedas, they are unhealthy, unnatural and destructive. So somone who wants to rebel against nature and nature's God is acting out of pride.

No, not pride. You are think of lust, but lust not so much the act of sex or making love, but the overindulgence of it.

338 posted on 12/06/2003 10:48:44 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
think=thinking
339 posted on 12/06/2003 10:48:56 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Pride leads to rebelliousness which leads to illicit acts, including same sex acts.

Hey - how about answering my two questions? Here they are again:

1. You must know that scripter's links to help for homosexuals means help to overcome or heal their same sex desires. Why do you pretend that you don't know what help for homosexuals means?

2. Why don't you state your position on homosexuality? Do you consider same sex acts morally neutral, healthy and good, immoral, unhealthy, or what? Or are you confused and trying to figure it out? Where on the spectrum do you stand? If you aren't honest, then there's no point in trying to have an honest conversation or debate about it.


(This is my last attempt to have a rational debate with you. If you can't/won't answer these questions, I will assume that you are either a homosexual apologist or out of your mind (oh yeah, they're one and the same thing).
340 posted on 12/06/2003 11:16:37 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 381-397 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson