Skip to comments.
Cruel Joke or Medical Anomaly?
UM List ^
| Tim Wilkins
Posted on 12/05/2003 5:50:56 AM PST by xzins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 381-397 next last
To: little jeremiah
Well, it all depends on how the arrogance is displayed and acted upon. Actually, even then, same sex sodomy trumps arrogance as a character defect.
I don't know what you are on, but arrogance has lead to more human suffering throughout human history than anything else. Tell that to the victims of Julius Caesar, Nero, Caligula, Napoleon, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, the Clintons; yes some of these people had homosexual leanings, but most of them didn't.
To: Paul C. Jesup
You still didn't anwer my two questions. Arrogance
when acted on to an extreme degree leads to other evils such as the evils indulged in by the people on your list. Additionally, most of them had other character defects besides plain arrogance which contributed to their evil
acts.
Everyone in the world (just about) has some degree of arrogance. Still can't be compared to an act. It's a state of mind.
In case you forgot, here's the two questions I asked which you haven't answered yet:
And what is your definition of "help"?
1. You must know that scripter's links to help for homosexuals means help to overcome or heal their same sex desires. Why do you pretend that you don't know what help for homosexuals means?
2. Why don't you state your position on homosexuality? Do you consider same sex acts morally neutral, healthy and good, immoral, unhealthy, or what? Or are you confused and trying to figure it out? Where on the spectrum do you stand? If you aren't honest, then there's no point in trying to have an honest conversation or debate about it.
To: little jeremiah
You seem to forget that I did not ask the first question. So you shouldn't have butted in.
To: little jeremiah
You seem to forget that I did not ask YOU the first question. So you shouldn't have butted in.
To: little jeremiah
Everyone in the world (just about) has some degree of arrogance. Still can't be compared to an act. It's a state of mind.
That is pure BS, surely you know about modesty.
To: Paul C. Jesup
And what is your definition of "help"? Farewell for now.
326
posted on
12/06/2003 6:16:42 PM PST
by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: little jeremiah
Time wasters and game players are coming out of the woodwork of late...
327
posted on
12/06/2003 6:44:44 PM PST
by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: Paved Paradise; scripter; EdReform
I think it's sort of like ones dietary choices.
In Korea nearly everyone ate dog. They liked it. But they had learned that dog was perfectly acceptable food. It was a means of relieving hunger that they accepted in their pantheon of food choices.
The same with homosexuality. At some point, every homosexual had a first homosexual experience. Like with eating dog, that was an introduction to a particular means of relieving their sexual urges. Since it worked once and brought about the desire result, they are then more likely to repeat that behavior in subsequent instances when they wish to relieve themselves sexually.
328
posted on
12/06/2003 6:44:47 PM PST
by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
To: Paul C. Jesup
The orderlies are coming for you now, it's medication time and then beddy-bye!
To: scripter
When people can't carry on a debate followind some basic rules, it is definitely a waste of time to participate in their hallucinations!
To: TEXOKIE
Thanks for the ping!
To: little jeremiah
I noticed this particular clown may have finally realized his error with my post 279 because he never responded to it. Maybe more prevalent and less prevalent and a little logic finally sunk in. When xzins made the point this clown said to butt out. Should have seen the clown for what he was at that time. Time wasters and game players indeed.
332
posted on
12/06/2003 9:13:51 PM PST
by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: little jeremiah; Revelation 911; xzins
I just realized something. This clown that keeps telling folks to butt out butted in himself with Rev 911 in post 9. While it's perfectly fine to butt in on this forum, it's rather inconsistent to tell others to butt out when you're butting in.
333
posted on
12/06/2003 9:29:39 PM PST
by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: scripter
If someone is discussing on a thread and tells someone to butt out, they should be Freepmailing instead. This thread is a party line!
To: little jeremiah
When people can't carry on a debate followind some basic rules, it is definitely a waste of time to participate in their hallucinations!
This from someone who thinks that homosexuality is worse than pride, the deadliest of the seven mortal sins.
To: scripter
And you consider someone asking you questions to be to extreme.
To: Paul C. Jesup
Pride is the source of homosexual acts. Why? Because same sex acts are forbidden in the OT, the NT, the Koran, and the Vedas, they are unhealthy, unnatural and destructive. So somone who wants to rebel against nature and nature's God is acting out of pride.
BTW you didn't answer my questions, so goodbye and good luck!
To: little jeremiah
Pride is the source of homosexual acts. Why? Because same sex acts are forbidden in the OT, the NT, the Koran, and the Vedas, they are unhealthy, unnatural and destructive. So somone who wants to rebel against nature and nature's God is acting out of pride.
No, not pride. You are think of lust, but lust not so much the act of sex or making love, but the overindulgence of it.
To: little jeremiah
think=thinking
To: Paul C. Jesup
Pride leads to rebelliousness which leads to illicit acts, including same sex acts.
Hey - how about answering my two questions? Here they are again:
1. You must know that scripter's links to help for homosexuals means help to overcome or heal their same sex desires. Why do you pretend that you don't know what help for homosexuals means?
2. Why don't you state your position on homosexuality? Do you consider same sex acts morally neutral, healthy and good, immoral, unhealthy, or what? Or are you confused and trying to figure it out? Where on the spectrum do you stand? If you aren't honest, then there's no point in trying to have an honest conversation or debate about it.
(This is my last attempt to have a rational debate with you. If you can't/won't answer these questions, I will assume that you are either a homosexual apologist or out of your mind (oh yeah, they're one and the same thing).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 381-397 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson