Skip to comments.
Wal-Mart in China (Wal-Mart and Chicoms find common ground?)
The Nation ^
| November 20, 2003
| Carl Goldstein
Posted on 11/22/2003 5:14:21 AM PST by A. Pole
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
No place for Solidarity in the free traders world.
1
posted on
11/22/2003 5:14:22 AM PST
by
A. Pole
To: Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Cacophonous; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones; ...
FYI
2
posted on
11/22/2003 5:15:13 AM PST
by
A. Pole
To: A. Pole
My heart really breaks for Walmart. (NOT)
Walmart has decided that it is better for them to abandon the free US worker and make love to the communist Chinese. I used to admire Walmart for its business savvy and the ability to streamline their business so well - back when they used to advertise "USA Made" - now I really don't care if the communists and the lawyers screw Walmart into bankrupcy.
If you sleep with dogs, don't be surprised if you get fleas.
To: All
Wang Meihua (not her real name), a perky salesclerk in her mid-20s dressed in a bright red Wal-Mart polo shirt and blue jeans, says most workers earn about $84 to $96 a month. That's enough to provide spending money for a young person with no dependents, but anyone trying to support a family on that wage would indeed be existing in a most basic fashion. I wonder what "existing in a most basic fashion" means in China.
4
posted on
11/22/2003 5:37:17 AM PST
by
A. Pole
To: A. Pole
I wonder what "existing in a most basic fashion" means in China.
5
posted on
11/22/2003 5:41:00 AM PST
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: A. Pole
Yeah--ain't it amazing how the freetraitors and the ChiComs can agree:
people don't really count when
profits are the question.
Next step for the freetraitors: "one-child" policy for the USA.
Get rid of all those excess people.
6
posted on
11/22/2003 7:18:29 AM PST
by
ninenot
(So many cats, so few recipes)
To: Dr Warmoose
Walmart has decided that it is better for them to abandon the free US worker and make love to the communist Chinese. I used to admire Walmart for its business savvy and the ability to streamline their business so well - back when they used to advertise "USA Made" - now I really don't care if the communists and the lawyers screw Walmart into bankrupcy. Ditto. I have no support for those companies, or people, who want to ally themselves with chinese communists. The chinese communists are not our friends, and those who want to be partners with them(the free traders) are not friends of conservatives either.
To: Dr Warmoose
Wal-Mart has become a 'global' company...we in the USA are the consumers, workers in China are the producers. Whatever arrangement works out for the best bottom line is going to be used. It's the same for so many large companies today who say they 'can't remain competitive' using US labor or even nearby friendly countries' labor.
A pair of shoes or a car stereo might cost $10 in materials and only a few cents for assembly labor in China. Shipping and packaging costs might add a couple of bucks more. Yet when that item appears in US stores, it still costs $100. These companies complain that to make the same item here would cost maybe $75. Well hey, if they still sell it for $100 that's still a 25% profit margin...wouldn't that have been considered good a few years ago? As it is now, someone is making 75% profit off that Chinese-made item. Hmm.
8
posted on
11/22/2003 8:36:45 AM PST
by
Sender
To: waterstraat
Interesting to see Freepers agree with the Nation...
China is becoming capitalist and you want to see us go in the Euro-socialist direction.
To: ninenot
Yeah--ain't it amazing how the freetraitors and the ChiComs can agree: people don't really count when profits are the question.Yeah, commie or capitalist free traitor, they all bow down to filthy lucre in the end, eh?
To: chipengineer
China is not becoming capitalist at all. Nor are they wanting to be free, nor do they want to adopt our Bill of Rights.
China wants our jobs, our money, our manufacturing, our industrial power, our influence and power around the world. They have no desire for our freedom , and in a few decades, they will be powerful enough to stop freedom where ever it might try to appear.
The industrial might and high tech that we are transferring there, will eventually let them have nuclear missles, and chinese aircraft carriers all around the world.
Your grandchildren will wonder why you gave away all of americas power to the chinese communists - and will ask you why.
To: Sender
A pair of shoes or a car stereo might cost $10 in materials and only a few cents for assembly labor in China. Shipping and packaging costs might add a couple of bucks more. Yet when that item appears in US stores, it still costs $100. These companies complain that to make the same item here would cost maybe $75. Well hey, if they still sell it for $100 that's still a 25% profit margin...wouldn't that have been considered good a few years ago? As it is now, someone is making 75% profit off that Chinese-made item. Hmm. The free traders tell us that free trade benefits us all. Are you saying that cheaper production does not lower the price of the product? Are you saying that Nike shoes are not not dirt cheap?
If Nike shoes and other products are not dirt cheap, then what exactly is the benefit to the average american citizen of free trade(other than being forced to "retire" at a very young age)?
To: chipengineer
China is becoming capitalist and you want to see us go in the Euro-socialist direction. Actually China is merely using Capitalism tio deveop the nation. The leadership and owners are still hard core Marxists andthose who support the current regime are the ones supporting internationalism and socialiism (Marxism if you will). Let America stay free with free markets behind appropriate and reasonable tariffs.
13
posted on
11/22/2003 9:44:45 AM PST
by
harpseal
(stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: A. Pole
Please use original headlines only. Thank you.
To: waterstraat
You do realize that producers try to maximize profit? What else about capitalism do you not understand?
15
posted on
11/22/2003 9:54:06 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Walkin Man
In the case of China, give them credit: they finally understood how to win the war against the USA.
Too bad the Commerce Department and KapitalistKarlRove don't really get it, yet.
16
posted on
11/22/2003 11:30:52 AM PST
by
ninenot
(So many cats, so few recipes)
To: waterstraat
>China wants our jobs, our money, our manufacturing, our industrial power, our influence and power around the world. They have no desire for our freedom...
You may be right about their current government, but that and you don't speak for the Chinese people. I am optimistic enough to expect the people there will achieve freedom in the next 20 years.
To: A. Pole
My new 17" LCD flat panel monitor was made in China.
Works great.
18
posted on
11/22/2003 1:41:24 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: A. Pole
It is, rat her, a virtual extension of the Communist Party and the government
Shouldn't it say "rather", or is "rat" as subtle message?
19
posted on
11/22/2003 1:53:38 PM PST
by
graycamel
(Year of the Rat? or DemocRat?)
To: graycamel
as=a
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson