Skip to comments.
House Demands Report from Army on LTC West Investigation
HASC Press Release
| 21 Nov 03
Posted on 11/21/2003 3:59:24 PM PST by O6ret
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-308 next last
To: O6ret
Please. Somebody grab the paddles and charge 'em up. Some Republicans actually showing some real stones.
To: muawiyah
Take your meds and reply with a sentance in english.
22
posted on
11/21/2003 4:29:31 PM PST
by
Ispy4u
To: Poohbah
Needless to say there's quite a difference between "threaten to kill" and "assault". My point concerned the reporters who write pieces about this event ~ they all conclude that Col. West "threatened to kill", when he didn't do that at all!
23
posted on
11/21/2003 4:32:45 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
The Congress is not "political" in the sense you intimate.Yes, it is.
And, Congress is NOT interfering with military justice.
Given that they are applying political pressure to spike an ongoing case, in lieu of actually rewriting the UCMJ to allow LTC West's behavior to stand...they are interfering with military justice.
24
posted on
11/21/2003 4:33:12 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: Pukin Dog
Look, Congress can change the rules at any time and it can independently call up the militia.
Think of the Constitutional process in terms of an invasion by a rogue division of Mounties marching on Detroit City.
Assume the President, taking delivery of his new limousine, has been taken captive.
You read the Constitution in that light and it all makes a lot of sense, particularly all the parts about Congress.
Again, the context is the Constitution, not the War Powers Act, and not the spineless weasels we've had as Congresscritters for the last 189 years.
25
posted on
11/21/2003 4:35:38 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Needless to say there's quite a difference between "threaten to kill" and "assault".A credible threat to apply unlawful deadly force--by, for example, discharging a pistol past their head while physically restraining them, thus putting them in reasonable and immediate fear of losing life or limb--is, by definition, assault, and is punishable under Article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
My point concerned the reporters who write pieces about this event ~ they all conclude that Col. West "threatened to kill", when he didn't do that at all!
Then you agree that Bill Clinton didn't have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky.
26
posted on
11/21/2003 4:36:56 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: Poohbah
Look here, in unloading his pistol Col. West used the Ba'athist's own beliefs against him. To the Ba'athist, if not you nor your friends in the news media, the threat was to pistol whip the guy ~ not to shoot him!
27
posted on
11/21/2003 4:39:57 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
You are just plain wrong, but I dont intend to post where. Enjoy your illusion. You are also wrong about Col. West, because you do not know the full extent of his actions. They will be made public in time, but all of you folks who believe what he did was discussed in total in the media, you will be quite surprised.
28
posted on
11/21/2003 4:40:19 PM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: muawiyah
Excerpt from:
Pretrial hearing starts on allegations military officer mistreated Iraqi detainee-Lt. Col West AP | 11/18/03 |Lt. Col. Allen B. West -- the most senior officer of the 4th Infantry Division to face such a proceeding -- attended the hearing with his lawyer in a U.S. military base in Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit.
West is accused of punching and firing a pistol near the prisoner, Yahya Jhodri Hamoodi, on Aug. 20 while he was being interrogated in Taji, according toLt. Col. Jimmy Davis, who presided over the hearing.
West also allegedly threatened to kill the detainee if he did not talk, Davis said, reading from a fact sheet. The hearing is to determine whether West should face court-martial.
It's more than the media saying he threatened to kill the guy.
29
posted on
11/21/2003 4:40:52 PM PST
by
Ispy4u
To: Pukin Dog
So where are you getting your inside information from?
30
posted on
11/21/2003 4:42:07 PM PST
by
Neets
(Watch out, because what goes around, comes around. God DOES not like UGLY!)
To: Pukin Dog
Did I say the "newsies" told the whole story?
Certainly not.
In fact, I asked why all of them draw a conclusion about West's intentions that is not supported by the evidence yet made public when, in fact, that evidence supports an entirely different conclusion.
31
posted on
11/21/2003 4:42:11 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Poohbah
"Whatever happened to the idea of "separation of f***ing powers?"
Doesn't that only pertain to the judicial, legislative and executive branches?
32
posted on
11/21/2003 4:42:55 PM PST
by
mass55th
To: joesnuffy
Good post. IMO you are right on.
DUB
33
posted on
11/21/2003 4:44:57 PM PST
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: mass55th
Doesn't that only pertain to the judicial, legislative and executive branches?Congress = legislative branch
Army = executive branch
Gosh, it looks like it applies here.
34
posted on
11/21/2003 4:44:58 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: Ispy4u
See that word "allegedly"? The "threaten to kill" has appeared in all the news reports. On what basis is it fair to conclude that Col. West actually did "threaten to kill"?
The Board doing the review might even have that phrase in front of them. I can see Col. West answering "I did not threaten to kill him ~ I did those acts which he would understand as a threat to pistol whip him".
Then he walks with a reduction in rank to Major and an early retirement.
35
posted on
11/21/2003 4:45:22 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Poohbah
...they are interfering with military justice.Congress CAN "interfere" with military justice. In case you haven't noticed, Congress makes ALL the rules. It's in Section I, of the US Constitution.
36
posted on
11/21/2003 4:45:39 PM PST
by
elbucko
To: Poohbah
militia = "the people as a whole"
37
posted on
11/21/2003 4:46:05 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
That was a statement by the presiding member of the Article 32 hearing. Not by the media. LTC Davis was reading that from a fact sheet. That means it's charges the army brought against the LTC and has nothing to do with the media reports you speak of.
Learn to read.
38
posted on
11/21/2003 4:47:15 PM PST
by
Ispy4u
To: O6ret
Thanks for posting this.
39
posted on
11/21/2003 4:50:43 PM PST
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: O6ret; All
Some of us have been writing our Congreeman and Senators about this. I hope it will be looked into and a metal awarded to the Lt C.
40
posted on
11/21/2003 4:52:34 PM PST
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-308 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson