Wow, bizarre. A neutron star at the core of the Sun? So how long do we have left? Not four billion years, I take it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 4ConservativeJustices; ...
The iron sun model hasn't gained currency. Get it? Currency?!? I kill me. This is yet another topic from the "iron" keyword, and should be considered fitting into the "Catastrophism and Astronomy" category of GGG. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
129 posted on
03/13/2005 7:20:45 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, March 13, 2005.)
To: LibWhacker
Dr. Oliver Manuel, a professor of nuclear chemistry, believes that iron, not hydrogen, is the suns most abundant element. In a paper accepted for publication in the Journal of Fusion Energy, Manuel asserts that the standard solar model -- which assumes that the suns core is made of hydrogen -- has led to misunderstandings of how such solar flares occur, as well as inaccurate views on the nature of global climate change. Isn't this the guy who said the sun's core was frozen???
To: LibWhacker
To answer the TITLE OF THIS POST, no. Iron is not 'causing' all the flares.
To: Professional Engineer
140 posted on
03/13/2005 8:14:37 PM PST by
msdrby
(Freedom, by its nature, must be chosen and defended by its citizens.)
To: LibWhacker
Somebody should take a magnet to the sun and see if it sticks.
151 posted on
03/13/2005 8:43:15 PM PST by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: LibWhacker
Hmmn. I think I need to see some data on this theory before I give it any credence at all.
It is an interesting Theory, but only that. Granted there is Iron in the core of the sun. We have known that for a long time. It is reasonable to assume that some of the material making up our solar system came from a super Nova. The Universe is afterall an OLD place. However, it would seem to me that the Neutron Star core thoery would lead to instability in our Star that we do not see, and can find no record of here on earth. Certanly the 11 year periodocity of oru sun's solar cycles would lead one to believe just the opposite. the period is too long. Most Neutron stars have rotational and magnetic patterns that are a LOT faster. Like a few rotations a second.
Like I said, interesting theory, but it just seems to ignore too many observations that we have made of our little sun. Lot's of Iron, yes. A Neutron Star core, uh, not buying in on that one.
163 posted on
03/13/2005 9:25:35 PM PST by
Danae
(Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
176 posted on
02/16/2008 8:59:04 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________Profile updated Sunday, February 10, 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson