Skip to comments.
Is a soldier's life worth more than $650? (Parents buying body armor for sons in Iraq)
JWR ^
| 10/02/03
| Jonathan Turley
Posted on 11/13/2003 8:41:38 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: Hermann the Cherusker; Nix 2
ping
To: Hermann the Cherusker; Nix 2
ping
To: Dr. Scarpetta
I too would purchase the neccessary body armor then deduct %100 of the cost from my income tax.
To: LADY J
Its time we all write our Senator and demand they buy the best for our guys. They deserve to have the armor they deserve.
To: CO_dreamer; newcats; Coop; tbpiper; AbnSarge
ping
To: pepsionice
The article indicated they will have them by Dec.
46
posted on
11/13/2003 9:53:18 AM PST
by
Blessed
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Like many other U.S. service members in Iraq, her son was given a Vietnam-era flak jacket that cannot stop the type of weapons used today. The Iraqies don't have any weapons the VC and NVA didn't have. The flak jacket wouldn't stop them then either. The Iraqies use the same gun firing the same catridge, AFAIK as the VC/NVA did(it's possible they've switched to the AK-74, which fires a smaller diameter round, with ballistics similar to the M-16's 5.56mm round).
47
posted on
11/13/2003 9:58:41 AM PST
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
As I understand the issue, the problem isnt cost, its availability. Typically, one company makes the vests. The Pentagon now has three companies working overtime to make them, but still only put out about 15,000 a month. So its going to take a little time to completely outfit 150,000 troops.
48
posted on
11/13/2003 9:59:10 AM PST
by
Tatze
(Give Pizza Chants!)
To: scan59
if this was a real situation they really wouldn't do us any good. Well, since "shrapnel" typically kill more soldiers than bullets, I'd say they would do you alot of good. YMMV depending on the situation. With most of the casualiteis now appearing to come from mortars and improvished explosives, not AK rounds, I'd say even the old flak jacket would be worth keeping around your bod.
49
posted on
11/13/2003 10:01:25 AM PST
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: LADY J
To: Tatze
The pentagon now has three companies working overtime to make them, but still only put out about 15,000 a month. So its going to take a little time to completely outfit 150,000 troops. ...not much comfort to a parent whose son died and may have been saved by one of these vests...
To: LADY J
"How many vests and plates could be bought with the pay raises the House and Senate gave themselves? Someone should ask them!" Great question. It seems that the Congress is more concerned with their safety, comfort, and financial well being than they are about that of our troops or disabled veterans.
Who would have ever thought that? /sarcasm
52
posted on
11/13/2003 10:05:01 AM PST
by
Badray
(Molon Labe!)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
To: MD_Willington_1976
Funny you should mention the congress critters, they are trying to ban non-civillian ownership of body armor...nice guys aren't they. Do you mean Congress doesn't want the military men to own their own armor? If so, why?
To: SoCal Pubbie
I have a hard time believing this article, or at least there must be more to the story.
It's not hard to believe at all. MOF, some people on
AR15.Com have gathered and sent over 30 round magazines for soldiers because the soldiers couldn't get enough issued to them. Not sure if they have done so for Iraq, but I know they have done so in the past.
55
posted on
11/13/2003 10:08:05 AM PST
by
zx2dragon
(I could never again be an angel... Innocence, once lost, can never be regained.)
To: Dark Wing
ping
56
posted on
11/13/2003 10:10:18 AM PST
by
Thud
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Did you buy these ceramic inserts for vests?
The one Iraq has the inserts to borrow when he has to fly or ride point on convoy. His unit shares a lot of equipment. The jackets aren't any good without the inserts from what I have been told.
The son in Afghanistan needed a lot more help due to his job. The were issued very little in the way of riot gear which is one of the duties.
To: Dr. Scarpetta
They are concerned about criminals such as the 2 guys from North Hollyweird that robbed the bank...and it's a lot harder to control an armed & armored populace..hence gun control and control over who has access to body armor...
To: armymarinemom
The one in Iraq has the inserts to borrow when he has to fly or ride point on convoy. His unit shares a lot of equipment. The jackets aren't any good without the inserts from what I have been told. The son in Afghanistan needed a lot more help due to his job. They were issued very little in the way of riot gear which is one of the duties.
It probably wouldn't do any good, but did you contact your congressman about this lack of gear for your sons?
To: Sender; jdogbearhunter; alieno nomine; da_toolman
too bad we can't send them some of these too.
IMI Travor
60
posted on
11/13/2003 10:19:26 AM PST
by
phasma proeliator
(it's better to die with honor than to live without it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson