Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DURST JURORS' PICTURE PUZZLE (brain dead mutants junk justice)
NY POST ^ | November 13, 2003 | LESLIE T. SNADOWSKY

Posted on 11/13/2003 2:16:37 AM PST by Liz

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:17:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Texas2step
I hear what you are saying but if either my husband or myself had been on the jury, it would have been a hung jury. Until late in 2001, we voted in Galveston Co. & could have been jurors had this trial happened sooner.
61 posted on 11/13/2003 8:04:24 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Loved the front page of the NY Post yesterday!
62 posted on 11/13/2003 8:05:49 AM PST by katnip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joathome
I heard a person who knew Morris Black, the victim, say that "if you had known him, you would have wanted to kill him too". He (Black) must have been a hateful person.
63 posted on 11/13/2003 8:08:54 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Diane Diamond of Court tv apparently also praised the jury.

One of the jurors was asked what she would have done if a lesser charge had been included. Her reply was, "I don't know."

We look sometimes at "Judge Judy," the best sitcom on TV. Yet it is also scary -- because those people get to vote and sit on juries and might even move next door. We can just hope that Scott Perterson and Kobe won't get OJ/Durst juries. It's not just in L.A.

64 posted on 11/13/2003 8:18:47 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
I think you are right. My gun & chainsaw seem to have minds of their own sometimes just like my SUV.
65 posted on 11/13/2003 8:19:46 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Yes. We can't be held accountable for the actions of objects.
66 posted on 11/13/2003 9:38:07 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I don't think you hread me right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Liz
In addition to the Durst and OJ cases, I can think of three other crazy jury decisions:

Hinckley's shooting of Reagan was caught on tape. Yet the jury voted "not guilty."

In 1981 well-to-do Steven Steinberg murdered his wife Elana. And he confessed. During trial he reportedly presented the "her shopping drove me to it" and "I've found God" defenses. The jury found him not guilty.

Rae Carruth's jury -- in a decision that boggled the mind -- found him guilty of conspiracy to commit murder and of shooting into an occupied vehicle but acquitted him of murder. At least he will do hard time.

Yet it appears to me, and I could be wrong, that judges make even more outrageous decisions that juries. (e.g. the cases of Amy Grossberg & Brian Peterson, the nanny, Terri Shiavo)

67 posted on 11/13/2003 11:12:17 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
I think you misunderstood. I started with "I would have strung up the guy...."
68 posted on 11/13/2003 11:12:33 AM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: joathome
OK sorry. That's why I had the ?'s. I can't read today.
69 posted on 11/13/2003 11:16:01 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I don't think you hread me right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Liz
The photos include Durst's arsenal of weapons - four guns, dozens of bullets, paring knives, hammers, ropes and bow saws.

This is far as I got.

70 posted on 11/13/2003 11:21:00 AM PST by Eaker (When the SHTF, I'll go down with a cross in one hand, and a Glock in the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katnip
The NY Post does it again!
71 posted on 11/13/2003 11:22:28 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
Well, there's empty-headed junk justice and then there's "buying" justice." Some of that might have gone on in the list you posted.
72 posted on 11/13/2003 11:33:49 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: katnip
In the court of public opinion, Durst has been declared guilty.

Unfortunately, he can still walk the streets looking for more victims.

73 posted on 11/13/2003 11:37:53 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Exactly.
74 posted on 11/13/2003 11:47:04 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
The whole jury selection process in this country needs to be reworked. The whole notion that we have "Jury Consultants," paid people who help an attorney pick a good jury, is a stunning travesty of the system and I can't believe the way it's just accepted. I like the British system--they call in fourteen people, and unless you're directly related to the defendant, you're on the jury. No questions, no peremptory challenges.
75 posted on 11/13/2003 12:18:35 PM PST by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
I saw some of these jurors last night on the tube. I didn't pay too much attention, but "not the brightest bulbs in the chandelier" did pop into my head while listening to the brief portion I did hear.
76 posted on 11/13/2003 1:47:48 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
And here we all thought the OJ jury was the dumbest. The Galveston jurors will go down in history as the biggest dumb bells ever to sit on a jury.

I just remembered part of what I heard them saying on tv last night. Something about it was never proven Durst did the killing. It was pointed out that he had admitted doing the killing and the juror proceeded to spin out some answer that made absolutely no sense.

77 posted on 11/13/2003 1:51:54 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat; Liz
OBTW, the Houston Chronicle's (TX Dem party PR outlet) political writer was in a tizzy yesterday defending the jury. About as fired up as he was when he was chastising the TX GOP against redistricting...

Of course he was. Galveston - a lovely city but egads -- a city that voted for McGovern and are now the last monolithic bastion of Democratic control in Texas.

78 posted on 11/13/2003 1:57:06 PM PST by Maeve (Pray the Chaplet of Divine Mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maeve
Self-correction:
Of course he was. Galveston - a lovely city but egads -- a city that voted for McGovern and is now the last monolithic bastion of Democratic control in Texas.
79 posted on 11/13/2003 1:58:12 PM PST by Maeve (Pray the Chaplet of Divine Mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Jury duty is akin to voting. If you refuse to do it, you have no right to complain about the outcome.

No one who's ever pulled whatever they could to NOT serve on a jury has any right to complain about the leftovers used from the jury pool....

Well, why you felt that little lecture was necessary is beyond me.

80 posted on 11/13/2003 2:01:44 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson