Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jessica's Hustled - Porn mag to run topless pics of G.I.
New York Daily News ^ | 11/11/03 | GEORGE RUSH

Posted on 11/11/2003 1:09:19 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: B4Ranch
How's that for unit cohesion?
21 posted on 11/11/2003 3:56:33 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
First off, this guy has claimed to have photos many times when he had nothing. (Thinking of a Presidential candidate dancing nude on top of a bar in a nightclub?)

Second, the descriptions he gives suggest these were not "posed" shots.

Third, if true, they belong to the US Army until they are properly released ~ because, according to the story, they were taken inside a military reservation. Rumsfeld himself would have to have handed them over.

Somebody better hope this is just another Larry Flynt BS job.

22 posted on 11/11/2003 4:04:05 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"Larry Flynt B.S. job"

You got it. Flynt is attempting to grab a peice the Lynch media circus. Hours after claiming to plan to publish these, he now says he bought the photos to sit on them. Photos that couldn't be positively identified anyway.

"I was offered photos of Jessica Lynch. I purchased them in order to keep them out of circulation, not to publish them," Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, said in a statement read by a publicist.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102736,00.html

23 posted on 11/11/2003 4:12:44 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: milemark
Flynt has the pictures of Jessica, says he won't publish them--but will he turn the pictures and negatives over to Jessica so she can destroy them? Naw, that'd be too nice--and Flynt has to squeeze every ounce of publicity out of this.
24 posted on 11/11/2003 4:24:22 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
The pics were without a clear view of the face anyway, so it could have been anyone. He would have been sued blue if he published them and labeled them as Lynch. This way he gets a load of publicity and makes himself look like a good guy, at least to some suckers, even though the whole story was bunk from the beginning. The British tabloids rejected those same photos because they couldn't be identified.
25 posted on 11/11/2003 4:35:00 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: milemark
Flynt is a bigger slimeball than what I previously thought--and I thought he was a huge slimeball before. What a bottom-dwelling slug.
26 posted on 11/11/2003 4:40:47 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
What more can be said? How low can he go? I shudder to think about it.
27 posted on 11/11/2003 4:47:43 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
The lovely thing is that these are usually faked photos.
28 posted on 11/11/2003 4:48:45 AM PST by AppyPappy (Pittsburgh beat Virginia Tech 31-28. Panthers rule!!".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Hey! We resent that!


29 posted on 11/11/2003 4:49:55 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . sed, ut scis, quis homines huiusmodi intellegere potest?. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I think Flynt's a total f-ing scumbag, but I find this humorous.
30 posted on 11/11/2003 4:50:11 AM PST by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
Flynt is a very partisan Democrat who is called upon from time to time by Clinton, McAuliffe, and company.

Good point. We need to hang the Democrats up by their feet and beat them with Larry Flynt.

31 posted on 11/11/2003 4:51:52 AM PST by AppyPappy (Pittsburgh beat Virginia Tech 31-28. Panthers rule!!".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jaime1959
White House spokesman Joe Lockhart describing Hustler as a ``news magazine''

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a62886b0df0.htm
32 posted on 11/11/2003 4:54:29 AM PST by AppyPappy (Pittsburgh beat Virginia Tech 31-28. Panthers rule!!".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: milemark
First Flynt announces plans to publish the pics, then after getting the front page of the NY Daily Spews, he says he bought the pics to bury them? How much did he pay for the pics? I'll bet it was for a lot less than the price of a full front page ad in the NY Daily snooze. He may be scum, but he is smart scum.
33 posted on 11/11/2003 4:59:26 AM PST by jaykay (Proud to be an Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
I have to agree with you. She willingly posed for these photos. It's not like she was filmed in the shower by a hidden camera. She made the decision to have herself photographed in an undressed state, and she has to live with it.
34 posted on 11/11/2003 5:01:18 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jaykay
I believe Flint is blackmailing Ms. Lych.

It sounded so strange to read the statements Ms. Lynch has been making. The exploitation of her rescue parrots the left-wing anti-US retoric.

Say what I want or I publish the pics
35 posted on 11/11/2003 5:02:21 AM PST by Republican Red (Karmic hugs welcomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
"She willingly posed for these photos."

Actually, the photos cannot be positively identified as her and flynt has backed off.

36 posted on 11/11/2003 5:06:15 AM PST by jaykay (Proud to be an Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
And I love how Mort Zuckerman's Daily News is SO above this "unspeakable" exploitation of her. Why, didn't they have their "exclusive" screaming front page THEY RAPED JESSICA only three days ago?

Funny how they're getting tips from publishers and the likes of Larry Flynt instead of their competition, the Murdoch-owned Post. You smellin' Rats?

37 posted on 11/11/2003 5:08:50 AM PST by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
Agreed. Hysteria, Histrionics, Decadence and Degeneration. The Four Pillars of present day Western Civilization.
38 posted on 11/11/2003 5:19:46 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: milemark
From the Fox News piece:

"I was offered photos of Jessica Lynch. I purchased them in order to keep them out of circulation, not to publish them," Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, said in a statement read by a publicist.

Yeah, I believe this.

39 posted on 11/11/2003 5:21:26 AM PST by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: milemark
Did you hear Al queda Gore's speech about repealing the Patriot Act? If a 'rat gets in the White House, you can count on it doing just that.

If a Dem gets power they will use the Patriot Act provisions to go after their political enimies, not America's enemies.

40 posted on 11/11/2003 5:24:33 AM PST by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson