Posted on 11/08/2003 6:48:09 AM PST by KQQL
Not only are the docs unnamed, the entire docs-telling-Lynch's-mother story is unquoted and it is left completely vague by the media organizations that report it.
We don't know which doctor told the mom or even if any doctor told the mom and we don't know what exactly the doctors said if they indeed did tell the mom.
This is what I'm talking about. It is important information that is left Freeping vague and it is left vague by the news organizations who report it.
They are the ones who know the unnamed sources and know the full quotes. Yet they leave it out -- such important detail.
If the WP, ABC news and and AP wanted to -- or at least the AP -- they could bust those unnamed sources wide-open right now. But they don't do it.
Why? Do you think they are really covering for the pentagon -- you can't be serious!
Then in the next account they give serious consideration to the complaint that the rescuers were overly prepared for resistance because there were no Iraqi resistance that was visible -- nevermined that there MIGHT be attackers laying hidden in order to suprise and apply maximum carnage to the rescuers.
I agree with you. If the rescuers had proceeded any other way, it would have been irresposible. Can you imagine what the press would be saying now if they casually walked in there and picked up Lynch's strecher only to be mowed down by the enemy. Duh!
Brainshrub, indeed:
|
||||
Edited on Sun Nov-09-03 09:31 PM by brainshrub
|
||||
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.