Skip to comments.
'I'm No Hero' -Former Iraq Captive Jessica Lynch
MaconAreaOnLine ^
| 11/6/03
Posted on 11/06/2003 7:29:27 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-215 next last
To: jjm2111
Well, if that's all the time it takes and they'll last all day in a convoy in trucks on dusty roads without getting dirty, then it looks like they could schedule that in.
161
posted on
11/07/2003 8:40:14 AM PST
by
#3Fan
To: #3Fan
Obviously the liberal tatics are alive and well here. If you can't answer the question, argue the facts, attack the person.
My original question, "Why was she given special protection" still stands. What was it to protect her from? The press?? Iraqis?? What?? Who??
162
posted on
11/07/2003 8:59:27 AM PST
by
Humal
To: jwalsh07
"the bastards sodomised her"
This was predictable. In the first Gulf War, the bastards raped 100% of female captives and 0% of male captives. You can extrapolate the women in combat argument from there. Bottom line, US military brass should be ashamed of themselves.
163
posted on
11/07/2003 9:09:01 AM PST
by
iranger
To: jjm2111
I don't remember the name but it was on one of the threads about the time PVT Lynch was rescued and the FReepers on that thread were discussing the MilSpec lube by name. You might try a keyword search on Her and see what comes up.
Many people I know use Triflolon (Teflon) spray and have good service with it, because it does not leave oily film deposits. Most gun shops keep it, heck maybe even Wally-world has it I have never look there.
164
posted on
11/07/2003 10:28:48 AM PST
by
ChefKeith
(NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
To: Humal
Obviously the liberal tatics are alive and well here. If you can't answer the question, argue the facts, attack the person.Pointing out your pettiness. lol
My original question, "Why was she given special protection" still stands. What was it to protect her from? The press?? Iraqis?? What?? Who??
Who cares, who cares, who cares? lol
165
posted on
11/07/2003 10:50:35 AM PST
by
#3Fan
To: iranger
This was predictable. In the first Gulf War, the bastards raped 100% of female captives and 0% of male captives. A woman is more likely to admit rape than a man. Word to the wise.
166
posted on
11/07/2003 10:51:59 AM PST
by
#3Fan
To: iranger
This was predictable. In the first Gulf War, the bastards raped 100% of female captives and 0% of male captives.The figure for males was considerably higher than 0%.
167
posted on
11/07/2003 10:52:34 AM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: #3Fan
If you want to argue exceptions to the rule, feel free.
168
posted on
11/07/2003 11:20:19 AM PST
by
iranger
To: Poohbah
Not according to the last figures I read. If you have sources that say different, I would not mind reading them.
169
posted on
11/07/2003 11:21:27 AM PST
by
iranger
To: iranger
If you want to argue exceptions to the rule, feel free.So high school.
170
posted on
11/07/2003 11:28:37 AM PST
by
#3Fan
To: templar
A question that's gotta be asked is: Where did the media get that 'lying brouhaha' information? Their own heads possibly? Heaven knows reports are beneath lying, look at Jason of the New York Times.
To: madison10
Ahem...correction of self: Heaven knows reporters are NOT beneath lying.
To: madison10
Probably correct both ways.
To: #3Fan
I certainly have no beef with her. She was out there, that's what counts. She was in place, doing her job, and God Bless her for it. But Americans who make a buck at the expense of blood, by lying about it to build it up to more than it is (and I am inlcuding "famous men" who write their books and memoirs "for money", they are, to my mind, less than dirt. There ought to be a law that every nickle that is made telling stories that were earned on the blood of vets and on the Government's nickle (our tax dollars) ought to go back to the Government, the Vets administration or the like.
174
posted on
11/07/2003 2:11:12 PM PST
by
RISU
To: RISU
I certainly have no beef with her. She was out there, that's what counts. She was in place, doing her job, and God Bless her for it. But Americans who make a buck at the expense of blood, by lying about it to build it up to more than it is (and I am inlcuding "famous men" who write their books and memoirs "for money", they are, to my mind, less than dirt. There ought to be a law that every nickle that is made telling stories that were earned on the blood of vets and on the Government's nickle (our tax dollars) ought to go back to the Government, the Vets administration or the like. Of course I disagree.
175
posted on
11/07/2003 2:15:28 PM PST
by
#3Fan
To: #3Fan
"So high school."
Theoretically, more high schoolers would deny being raped...
Let me know when you are ready for rational discourse.
176
posted on
11/07/2003 2:58:55 PM PST
by
iranger
To: #3Fan
I understand you now. Sometimes I catch on slow.
177
posted on
11/07/2003 3:21:10 PM PST
by
BBell
To: Tumbleweed_Connection; Howlin
Maybe you have seen it, but I read a thread on here where she blamed the military for embelishing her capture
An early media report quoted unnamed U.S. officials as saying she "fought to the death" before being captured and suffered multiple gunshot wounds. The Army later concluded she was hurt when her Humvee crashed into another vehicle in the convoy after being hit by a grenade.
But didn't the media source who fabricated the account of her capture come out and say they lied?
To: oh8eleven
Oh yea, brings back memories.
179
posted on
11/07/2003 7:27:10 PM PST
by
BBell
To: ppaul
Please extrapolate on your reply.
I don't recall making any comments that detracted from either Sgt. Walters or Private Lynch. I simply corrected the record and explained how the heroic actions of one were incorrectly attributed to another.
Based on the accounts of those who did survive the battle, Private Lynch's injuries as a result of the crash were grave enough that they believed she was dead. We cannot judge her willingness to engage the enemy, because she was physically incapable of engaging the enemy. This was most certainly not an attempt to claim that she wasn't a "real" soldier.
Which reminds of me two other false stories that circulated about Lynch: that she got them lost (she was not commandeering that group, another was) and that she was driving the vehicle (she was in the back).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-215 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson