Terri Schindler Schiavo Guardianship Hearing Wednesday November 5, 2003

www.terrisfight.org ^

[drlevy88]

(and an unfaithful husband)

[drlevy88]

It also argued that it should have been filed in Leon County - where Bush is based - instead of Pinellas County.

LEON? Is that a red county?????

[supercat]

but to have children by Jodi without first divorcing Terri is scandalous.

He has had 3 CHILDREN since he has been married to Terri. Right?

Two by Jodi. The one by someone else I would consider to be a rumor.

[Chocolate Rose]

LEON? Is that a red county?????

I have no idea. Wish I knew the answer also.

[texastoo]

If this was last year's petition, then this judge should be disbarred. He is as guilty as Michael Shiavo.

[Chocolate Rose]

"WorldNetDaily reported the motion, originally filed in November 2002, seeks the appointment of Terri's sister or brother as the successor guardian and chief decision maker."

Sounds like the one "and by Hand Delivery to GEORGE FELOS, this 15th day of November, 2002."

[oceanperch]

Wow Bump/ Terri's siblings are younger and perhaps a better choice.

That does not mean Mom and Dad cannot keep busy caring for Terri and sharing life.

Man Let's Pray that Terri's Fight be resolved soon.

You Go Terri

[oceanperch]

Pegita Thank You for inserting prayers when you do...it makes us all stop and listen.

[Pegita]

+ To God be the Glory ...

[oceanperch]

Um I had sex once but it did not blind me to my obligations.

Bottom line is Terri should and will continue to get baseline care and hopefully someday be in a freer enviroment.

Baseline care in our case is 150ml per hr via a Pet Pump 20hrs. per day
rotating two formulas with 1000 ml of water per feeding cycle. We should all eat so healthy.

[Deep_6]

Re:
"Terri should and will continue to get baseline care"

Yup. That ought to keep her locked in that living coffin awhile.

To those praising God and giving thanks for the decision presented
on this currant thread......

Will you still give thanks if the decision to remove her from her
life support is rendered? Wouldn't that also be representative of
God's will?

 

[Oh, don't mind me.... I'm just a troll....]

[TigersEye]

Here's a view from a 'living coffin.'

[atruelady]

I will tell you. Having lived in Virginia, most southern states have laws on the books that adultery IS against the law. This is mostly used in reference to cases for divorce OR custody issues where the courts, ruling by law, determine that it is not healthy for children to be around an adulterous parent AND/OR the right of the wronged spouse to get relief from the court.

It is against the law in Virginia to live with someone you are not married to. I am sure most states in that area have the same laws on the books.

[atruelady]

Show me ANY WOMAN or man for that matter that would want the spouse to make decisions while they are off having kids and living another life with someone else. I sure as hell wouldn't.

And Schiavo is deciding that his wife should die!

His tramp Jodi deserves him. She is a female version of Schiavo, murderous and cold. Too bad God didn't stop her from reproducing. The legacy of murdererous Schiavo's is upon us.

[Wampus SC]

Will you still give thanks if the decision to remove her from her life support is rendered? Wouldn't that also be representative of God's will?"

So someone professing faith flushed you out, huh? If saying a decision that helps her have the tube stay in is God's will -- consider that a decision to the tube out would be a reversal - the opposite - of that decision. So, who's will is a reversal and opposite of God's? Just asking. Hypothetically, mind you.

[Oh, don't mind me.... I'm just a troll....]

Who would have ever thought. (/sarc)

[Deep_6]

Re:
"..So, who's will is a reversal and opposite of God's?..."

Why don't you take the time to read at the URLs I supplied that
describe the various Churches opinion on that very topic?

Say, you don't suppose our Lord has better plans for Terri
and is doing His best to insure she gets to where He wants her?

How else do you explain the scurrilous husband's victory after
victory?

 

[oceanperch]

hmmmmm.....God Bless You Deep_6.


Terri Fight for life bump.

Still Praying that God Bless all of us who care for the disabled and limited voice.

Lord Hear Our Prayer.

That those who see life as a prison respect those who chose to live even with barriors.

Lord Hear Our Prayer.

[Wampus SC]

Not again? A question that was straightforward and simple to answer, met with more questions instead. That seems to happen a lot with people of the "pull the tube now" school of thought. I don't understand. Could have been so easy. After all, you did quote a snippet, so it was right in front of you.

One poster was so patient that he asked his one-line question three times, even when met each time with just more questions. I suppose my observations on tactics of those espousing untenable postions (appended below) are correct, doggone it. Could've been so simple. And to show how simple, and to show patience, a proposition -- Answer my one simple question, directly, without just asking more questions instead, in a reply to this post. When you've done that, then I will answer all three of yours.

It's easy. All you have to do is say the name - the name of the person or entity whose will is the opposite of God's will. Or alternatively, say you're unable to answer that. Don't forget, that's the question you yourself quoted. Hint: the "[To (msg#)]" button is for referring back. It's really simple for anyone to click it.... I'm open to discussion, not so open to stalling.

---

To: Deep_6

I've asked this question of several people who want Terri to die, and they just won't answer it. Now I'll ask you:

What do you stand to lose if Terri gets to live?

Those with untenable positions usually do one of three things at times like this:

* Say nothing, pretending that's an answer.
* Ask you a question, pretending they already answered it.
* Answer something that wasn't asked, pretending they're answering the question.

I wonder what it'll be this time.

123 posted on 11/04/2003 2:42 AM EST by Wampus SC ((Fly the Gadsen Flag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[Deep_6]

Re:
"It's easy. All you have to do is say the name - the name 
of the person or entity whose will is the opposite of God's will."

How smug can a person be, to assume what God's will is.

Why don't you go read at some of the URLs I posted on other
threads, that describe how the various Churches feel about
life support systems; how they interpret the usage of a system
that keeps a body alive when it may be more obvious that
God's intentions were otherwise?

Read my post #96 again, if you haven't already. Terri's husband
continues to survive, doesn't he?

Do you really believe you know what God's will is?

I would not proffer a guess; I would not assume.

 

[Wampus SC]

(Sigh) Here I was being optimistic, thinking that maybe, just maybe, you were capable of doing it. Maybe just this once.

(Now I'm just sitting here wondering to my self, "reckon he thinks he did it"?)

Cool capture file, though. :)