Skip to comments.
Sean Hannity has a scoop on dem party corruption (Vanity)
Sean Hannity radio show ^
| 11/04/03
| Unknown Democrat (via Sean Hannity)
Posted on 11/04/2003 1:27:18 PM PST by jocon307
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 821-835 next last
To: StriperSniper
Thanks, Striper. I had no idea who that was! :-)
321
posted on
11/04/2003 3:18:19 PM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(Anyone that doesn't support Bush over these morons hates America!)
To: nuffsenuff
I hate liberals. Yeah, along with those on FR that think "there is nothing here, let's just move along".
322
posted on
11/04/2003 3:19:45 PM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(Anyone that doesn't support Bush over these morons hates America!)
To: Dog
Comes full circle Wonder if that circle will get a bit bigger
I'll bet a number of Dems are sweating right now .. especially Rockefeller
323
posted on
11/04/2003 3:19:49 PM PST
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Wait4Truth
Oh yes, I'm on your same page.
324
posted on
11/04/2003 3:20:26 PM PST
by
onyx
To: mewzilla
could be any chance that the Dems colluded with certain Labour party members/BBC in what happened to Blair...? There was an article just a little while back about liberals meeting with each other across the sea...
Prairie
325
posted on
11/04/2003 3:20:45 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(God bless our coaltion troops. And their families because they are soldiers too.)
To: Wait4Truth
Seriously... What's up with those guys?
Party poopers.
To: onyx
Sen. Roberts denied it's from the Sen. Intel. Committee, but when Sean asked him where he got the memo from, what did he say? From a committee member or his staffer????
To: Wait4Truth; Mo1
You all want a live thread for the 9 dwarves debate tonight??
328
posted on
11/04/2003 3:21:44 PM PST
by
Dog
To: aristeides
Zell was on Sean's program last night! : )
To: onyx
Oh yes, I'm on your same page. I'm proud to be in such good company, onyx!
330
posted on
11/04/2003 3:22:14 PM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(Anyone that doesn't support Bush over these morons hates America!)
To: concerned about politics
It reeks of a "sell out the country to win an election" Clinton, doesn't it? Yes it does .. whether Hellary gets her hands dirty over this is a different story
331
posted on
11/04/2003 3:22:24 PM PST
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Dog
Yes, lets call your thread, "Pukin Dems".
332
posted on
11/04/2003 3:23:06 PM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: nuffsenuff
I would guess that they are the same ones that don't support President Bush on ANYTHING!
333
posted on
11/04/2003 3:23:29 PM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(Anyone that doesn't support Bush over these morons hates America!)
To: HunkOfBurninLuv
Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV was just on the Big Story on Fox news talking about the investigation that he was heading against the failed intellegence with the War.He was going after the President when John Scott interupted him and told him that the President didnt say iminent threat that he,John Rockefeller did though,He started rambling after that and said that we need to get to the bottom of the failure.Coinsidence?
334
posted on
11/04/2003 3:23:34 PM PST
by
tapatio
To: nicmarlo
What happened??
335
posted on
11/04/2003 3:23:58 PM PST
by
Dog
To: Steve_Seattle
Morally reprehensible and translates into American Soldiers getting killed in Iraq because the terrorists and Ba'athists REALIZE they have Democrat Party allies in the U.S. Congress! Despicable democrats ... a stake through the heart of that corrupt bloody-handed party is too good for the bastards!
336
posted on
11/04/2003 3:24:25 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: Dog
You all want a live thread for the 9 dwarves debate tonight?? Sure, why not? We'll have to watch both the debate and the election results from MS and KY.
337
posted on
11/04/2003 3:24:56 PM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(Anyone that doesn't support Bush over these morons hates America!)
To: concerned about politics
Pat R.,if anyone should not be dancing in the streets over this memo. In the first option, it points out how the dims can take advantage of his partisanship.
The entire memo points out for all to see, the blatent politization of the Intel. Comm., by the dims. A commitee that should have the security of the United States, as it's only priority.!
To: mewzilla
"This is treason" Well, DUH! It's what they do! It's what they've been doing for years, but unless their @$$*s start getting tried for it, nothing is going to change....no, I take that back. It will get worse, because the more they get away with it, the bolder they become.
.
Well worth reading if you haven't already.
339
posted on
11/04/2003 3:26:45 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: jocon307
Okay, I read the memo, and as much as I hate Liberals, I'm sorry...but I don't see the big deal. Here's my analysis point by point.
For the record, this is a VERY cursory look at the document. I don't have the time or the gumption to nit-pick the thing.
We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:
In English: They say here that they are going to abide by the rules of the committee.
1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard.
Here it says that they will use the committee to see if there was any negligence on the part of the Bush Administration. So? That's supposed to be a surprise? Isn't that what this committee is for? They are SUPPOSED to look for shortfalls!
I'll even go a step further...if there are any short-comings, Senator Hatch will be the first to point it out so that it can be corrected. Isn't that what this committee is all about?
Assiduously prepare Democratic 'additional views' to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it.
Here it says that if anything suspicious comes out of the committee, they will make sure the other Democratic members of congress know about it.
So? Isn't that what an opposition party is supposed to do? Why are we worried about this? It's not like the Dems are saying they are going to make-up evidence to nail the President. Furthermore, most thinking people don't trust what the Libs say anyhow.
Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation of the administration's use of intelligence at any time. But we can only do so once.
Yawn! If they can't find anything in the committee what the hell do they expect to find with an independant investigation? And even if they had one, the Dems don't have the power to subpoena jack-shit.
Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet we have an important role to play in revealing the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral preemptive war.
In English this means that the Dems KNOW that most Americans don't care about this issue and that all this scheming isn't going to lead to much. At best they might score "prove" that the Bush Administration is not forthright.
I'm open to comments...but I don't see the big deal about this memo. It's unsigned and looks like a very crude strategy-plan...but nothing that our side wouldn't do if the shoe was on the other foot. I seriously doubt this has legs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 821-835 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson