Skip to comments.
Hillary is running (Farah Believes that Hillary Clinton "Is Running" for President in 2004)
Farah Columns ^
| 11-03-03
| Farah, Joseph
Posted on 11/03/2003 6:08:32 AM PST by Theodore R.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Theodore R.
With Hillary in the race, it will be as black and white as black and white will ever be.
Hillary or Bush.
There will be no third choices.
41
posted on
11/03/2003 7:25:44 AM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(My Heroes Have Always Been Cowboys -- Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Theodore R.
TEXAS will never vote for Hillary. I hope she just goes right on and runs. Her haughty attitude will proove her to be the witch she is. Run Hillary Run.... And watch GW Win BIG TIME.
42
posted on
11/03/2003 7:26:11 AM PST
by
JFC
To: Theodore R.
She's not running this time around because the economy is turning up. She's evil, but not stupid.
43
posted on
11/03/2003 7:27:13 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: kjam22
Either that, or a plan to knock off the b*tch first, as soon as he's elected.
44
posted on
11/03/2003 7:31:06 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: 70times7
As someone pointed earlier..if Rudy runs against her in 2006, she has a very good chance of losing. If she does lose that race, her career is over. The dems are not known for forgiving losers (don't expect Gray Davis to get much help from the Dems now).
She has a choice, can she win now in 2004 against Bush or can she we against Rudy in 2006 and in 2008 against an unknown future opponent?
I believe no to the first 2 and who knows on the last.
45
posted on
11/03/2003 7:31:46 AM PST
by
xusafflyer
(Keep paying those taxes California. Mexico thanks you.)
To: Aquinasfan
Sometimes when she "communes" with the "ghost" of TR's niece, Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary must ask, "How can we fool them so easily for so long?" And Eleanor's ghost would say, "Honey, you had good teachers in Franklin and me."
To: null and void
>The Hillary!
Decade begins
Decade? Hell, if she
runs as VP, that's eight years
with her as VP,
then she runs for boss,
and spends another eight years
in the driver's seat...
That is sixteen years
and she doesn't have to kill
anyone near her
(unless, of course, she
just wants to keep in practice...).
Buckle up. Rough road.
To: theFIRMbss
You're trying to make it impossible for me to sleep, aren't you?
To: Theodore R.
She does not possess Bill's hypnotic effect on the mid-left and left-center voters. Her only power is on the far-left. Great for the party nomination, but certain death in the election. At least this is my hope.
49
posted on
11/03/2003 7:35:09 AM PST
by
2grit
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Hillary will only run if she believes that Bush can only be beaten by her.You credit her with far too much integrity. She will run if she believes (a) Bush is vulnerable, and (b) she can win the nomination.
If Bush loses to a different Dem, it would force her to stay out until 2012. There's no way she wants to sit around for 8 years, waiting for a Dem incumbent to possibly screw it up so bad that even she can't win the WH for the Dems in '12 (think Carter or even X42).
No, if she thinks she can win, she'll run, regardless of whether any other dwarf has a chance.
50
posted on
11/03/2003 7:36:20 AM PST
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
black and white . . . no third choices
Well, there may be a "green" choice in Ralph Nader AGAIN. I heard that James Carville does not allow the name "Ralph Nader" uttered in his presence.
To: Theodore R.
I'm not speculating. I'm forecasting. I'm prophesying. If I were a betting man, I would be placing the farm on it.
Yep that's how Las Vegas makes it money...... those betting that are positive they can't lose. Nothing is that assured in Politics.... Remember Texas and the Dream Team that was going to win it all for the democrats?
She needs a few more years to give the people time for their memories to fade some more about recent past of her husbands administration....
52
posted on
11/03/2003 7:49:34 AM PST
by
deport
To: Theodore R.
Ralph's no third choice for anyone that frequents this site however.
53
posted on
11/03/2003 8:14:31 AM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(My Heroes Have Always Been Cowboys -- Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: 1Old Pro
1) A weak Democrat primary field. So weak that people will practically beg her to get in the race. 2) Continuing bad media from Iraq over the next 2-4 months. Good points. They've got the 'death-toll-from-Iraq' hammer and will use it (we're seeing caskets now)
Also, the thought of gun grabbing Million Moron Moms heading to the polls will heat things up when the AWB sunset is to occur (did you see video of the lawyer dodging bullets from behind a tree?)
54
posted on
11/03/2003 8:21:49 AM PST
by
budwiesest
(Gladly: The cross-eyed bear.)
To: Theodore R.
She's getting vitriolic against President Bush. One of my posts in another thread ended up with a double-type of the word "more" (a typo, not for emphasis).
I believe the author of the above article could use that extra work in the above sentence.
To: Theodore R.
All she needs is some lameass like McMainiac to run third party.
The country is divided. It's very close.
Like an old time gunfighter, she will set herself up with and edge. The sun at her back, a few million stolen votes, some traitorous rogue like McMainiac running third party.
Remember, the Klintons came out of nowhere to run against what should have been an unbeatable GHWBush.
People shouldn't think they are gutless just because they are evil.
To: 1Old Pro
Not unless she has a Ron Brown/Vince Foster emergency plan in mind. She will never give up the top spot.
57
posted on
11/03/2003 8:43:58 AM PST
by
amexmike
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Well, they are surely not "gutless." They have too much self-confidence to be considered "gutless," don't they? The clintons missed church the day the minister spoke on the topic "man should not think too highly of himself."
To: Theodore R.
Would not this announcement have been greatly more appropriate for this past Friday?
.
.
.
.
That is to say for: Halloween Day
To: Theodore R.
I guess the right word for them is "Brazen."
They've gotten away with so much. Doubt if they fear any repercussions.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson