Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHAT ON EARTH HAS HAPPENED TO CANADA?
Le Quebecois Libre ^ | October 25, 2003 | Chris Leithner

Posted on 11/01/2003 1:11:37 PM PST by sourcery

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2003 1:11:37 PM PST by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tauzero; BikerNYC; NittanyLion; Rulling Lord; Lil'freeper; Brian S
FYI
2 posted on 11/01/2003 1:16:18 PM PST by sourcery (Moderator bites can be very nasty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
French Canada is the reason.
The rest of Canada suffers because of the francis influence.
pally vous frog.
3 posted on 11/01/2003 1:18:12 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (CCCP = clinton, chiraq, chretien, and putin = stalin wannabes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
From those able to pay, to those unable to pay -- means the destruction of freedom and wealth, with poverty for all.
4 posted on 11/01/2003 1:22:45 PM PST by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
It's not just the French. In my view, Canada is composed of five distinct political regions.

1) Ontario. The largest province, by far. Has politics similar to Massachusetts. Elects left-leaning parties to the national parliament. Pockets of conservatives, but the conservative party is split, so they don't win many seats (ridings).

2) Quebec. French speaking. Were more separatist than they are now. Leans left, more so than Ontario, but with all that French language stuff.

3) The maritims. Really hard core left.

4) The western provinces. Conservatives. Some urban areas are more liberal.

5) The north. Not many people, lots of ice. Indians.

5 posted on 11/01/2003 1:23:24 PM PST by Koblenz (There's usually a free market solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
4) The western provinces. Conservatives. Some urban areas are more liberal.

We could use a few more conservative rural states. :^)

6 posted on 11/01/2003 1:26:38 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Very interesting. I have never given much thought to Canada. But, I never associated it with being a wealthy country, long as I can remember it has been a socialist kind of place. And the weather...ugh

My grandmother-in-law has a condo in south Florida and many European transplants to Canada have their winter homes in her complex. I always wondered why in god's name they chose Canada. I am from upstate NY and I have never even had the slightest impulse to jump in the car and visit.

7 posted on 11/01/2003 1:33:43 PM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Socialism is working its magic, gradually converting Canada into an economic, political, and intellectual backwater. In 20 years it will transformed into a impoverished basket case, a frozen Argentina. The best and the brightest flee to the US.
8 posted on 11/01/2003 1:33:46 PM PST by friendly (Man is so made that whenever anything fires his soul, impossibilities vanish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: friendly
Socialism is working its magic, gradually converting Canada into an economic, political, and intellectual backwater.

Yes. A cationary tale, wouldn't you say?

9 posted on 11/01/2003 1:36:21 PM PST by sourcery (Moderator bites can be very nasty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Yeah, a lesson seen here in Red Davis' California and the entire NorthEast toilet full of little quasi-socialist states.
10 posted on 11/01/2003 1:39:06 PM PST by friendly (Man is so made that whenever anything fires his soul, impossibilities vanish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Canada suffers under the legacy of Pierre Elliott Trudeau, a wealthy intellectual dilletante who never held a steady job until he became Prime Minister.

But Trudeau would have died an obscure academic, and Jean Chretien remained a small-town lawyer, had it not been for Mr. Nobel Prizewinner himself, Lester Bowles Pearson, who first put them into Cabinet.
11 posted on 11/01/2003 1:59:16 PM PST by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riri
"I have never given much thought to Canada."

No one has. Not even Canadians except so far as they define themselves as not Americans.

In all seriousness, the future of Canada lies in a politcal union with the United States.

12 posted on 11/01/2003 2:07:56 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Exactly, the mumbling, stuttering social engineer Lester Pearson began the descent….. “Transformed into a impoverished basket case, a frozen Argentina”…

They know all about the US,( watch US tv,media,spend vacations in Florida),yet the liberals,and even working class stiffs ,while they whine about ottawa,taxes etc , still defend Canada,and bad mouth Americans and the USA .


It’s like racism,they feel superior to Americans, claiming their multi cultural ,non-military society is better.

Le frogs are in a total different country altogether!
13 posted on 11/01/2003 2:24:32 PM PST by wiseone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; Tauzero; BikerNYC; NittanyLion; Rulling Lord; Lil'freeper; Brian S; Koblenz; Loyalist
Just a question:

Does Canada's history of changes to its immigration policy in any way correlate to its decline?
14 posted on 11/01/2003 2:31:25 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
WHAT ON EARTH HAS HAPPENED TO CANADA?

The same contagion that has infected Australia, New Zealand, and Great Britain as well. Socialism.

15 posted on 11/01/2003 2:32:52 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riri
But, I never associated it with being a wealthy country, long as I can remember
it has been a socialist kind of place. And the weather...ugh


I got to visit twice as a child in the mid 1960s (Montreal), then twice to
western Canada (Edmondton) in the late 1970s and twice to Vancouver in the 1990s.

I suspect the "Switzerland of the North" tag was true in the 1960s. But, two of my
cousins left Edmondton in the late 1980s and are now doing quite well in Dallas.

As for climate, don't let it totally fool you.
If I suddenly won the lottery, I'd probably buy houses in Los Angeles, Vancouver, and DFW (family)
and just spend my time jetting between them based on the weather and my wims!
16 posted on 11/01/2003 2:38:46 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VOA
True, about the weather. After six years in Phoenix--sunshine and blue skies aint what it used to be.
17 posted on 11/01/2003 2:45:04 PM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
What keeps the conservatives split in Ontario?
18 posted on 11/01/2003 2:47:27 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Oui ping
19 posted on 11/01/2003 2:49:12 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Bump. eh?

IMO, west of Ontario should have the option of becoming states, along with the Atlantic provences, but as only one state. No more silly places like Rhode Island, Conn., Mass., Maine, NH, or Vermont. La Belle Q, has that nasty frog in her voice, like EUnichs, like Ontario.

With the coming ice sheet, none of this will matter, because within one or two generations, Canadians and the islamists will be forced south as nature's refugees, supervised closely by the UN. Hudson Bay and the Great Lakes are just puddles left behind.

What will the EU do when ice comes a calling? Blame the USA?

Until then, blame the US for leading Canada in nearly everything, especially supersonic aircraft design, as what happened in the '60s when Canada ran off its talent to find a home at NASA.
20 posted on 11/01/2003 2:55:47 PM PST by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson