Skip to comments.
Schiavo lawyers challenge 'Terri's Law'
AP
| 10/29/03
Posted on 10/29/2003 2:20:27 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-163 last
To: george wythe
The law in
Calder v. Bull was, I believe, at least as narrow as Terri's Law. It was different in that it did not command a result, only ordered a new trial. Given the language you cite from
Calder v. Bull, it is possible that federal courts would not uphold Terri's Law because of that (possible, but not certain -- the quoted language doesn't commit itself on what would be done in that situation.)
Of course, if the courts did strike down Terri's Law on that basis, the Florida legislature would still then be free, under Calder v. Bull, to order a new trial under a new legal regime established prospectively by statute.
To: Pan_Yans Wife
The sworn testimony only came recently, as the people who gave statements said they tried to do so before, but had been intimidated by Michael, and could not get a prosecutor to listen to them. The Prosecutor is just now deciding to see if he can go forward with the case.
To: aristeides
Astute observations.
It will be interesting to see what the courts decide in the next few months, and how the legislature will react.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-163 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson