Skip to comments.
BUSH HOSTED RAMADAN DINNER AAT WHITE HOUSE (Mired in controversy)
Yahoo ^
| 10/28/2003
| Staff
Posted on 10/29/2003 5:21:37 AM PST by JesseHousman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 441-443 next last
To: AAABEST
YOUR fan club?
You've been hanging around The Toddler much too often.
Every contact between you and I is initiated by you, not me. Every time you post to me, you do the FR equivalent of holding a lit cigarrete lighter aloft, and pay homage to Darkdrake.
You called MY radio show.
Buddy, the only thing left for you to do is to send me a postcard asking for an autographed picture.
And by the way, I've lost the weight, but you can't grow the teeth back...can you?
341
posted on
10/29/2003 7:28:58 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Those who think they know, really piss off those of us who truly do.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
I get it.. So there's no pope either, since the Catholics and Orthodox split up, not to mention the protestants..
Hell, we learned that "the original four caliphs" stuff in grade school. Doesn't mean that the whole Caliphate tool wasn't used for centuries to control the populations after his Excellency Ali's death. It was finally abolished in 1924 by the Turks who were the last ones to hold it.
342
posted on
10/29/2003 7:29:57 PM PST
by
a_Turk
(Nothing's good that uses bad...)
To: Dane
"Gotta love me, that is for sure auto club."I don't think it has anything to do with any autos, maybe he has a friend named Bill W.
343
posted on
10/29/2003 7:31:29 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Those who think they know, really piss off those of us who truly do.)
To: a_Turk
The Catholics of the world recognize the Pope as the spiritual leader of the Church, but Muslims have not recognized one Caliph in centuries. Anyone can name himself Caliph, but if not recognized, then he has no power.
My statement stands as I meant it...Islam has not had a unifying Caliph in nearly 1500 years.
It appears that the Turks held something no one recognized as valid. If that were not so, they would have not been able to abolish it without serious challenges within the Islamic world.
344
posted on
10/29/2003 7:36:52 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Those who think they know, really piss off those of us who truly do.)
To: Semper Paratus
You said..."Should have had a Ramadan luncheon instead."
i say... Yeah!
How about pork ribs with pork & beans with bacon and ham!
And then we can all play a little football game with the old pig skin.
To: Cultural Jihad
Spoken as a Salon Bolsheviki. Why don't you yourself start decapitating these children, instead of calling for other people to do what you want seen done? You mean these future mass murderers?


See these larvae eventually turn into these parasites:

Please, just bring me the axe and the chopping block along with their sick-dog parents and let the problem solving begin. After I was done with them you would never see a disgusting display like this in public ever again. Promise.
The reason why you hold the sentiments you do is because of emotion and because you don't understand how these people think.
Yes CJ, they really do hate everyone but themselves. Yes they do want you and your family dead and yes they do want to see the destruction of Israel.
We've at this point tried everything to deal with these half-apes equitably, they've had their chance. Now it's time to start thinking outside of the box.
346
posted on
10/29/2003 7:46:10 PM PST
by
AAABEST
To: Luis Gonzalez
>> The Catholics of the world recognize the Pope as the spiritual leader of the Church, but Muslims have not recognized one Caliph in centuries.
Here we go.. Catholics to Sunni as Christianity to Islam. Look at your sentence. According to it, Christians have not recognized one pope for centuries..
By the time The Turks abolished the Caliphate it had become weak, corrupt, and a joke, there you are right. It was worse than useless, it was dangerous to keep around.
347
posted on
10/29/2003 7:49:35 PM PST
by
a_Turk
(Nothing's good that uses bad...)
To: a_Turk
"According to it, Christians have not recognized one pope for centuries." I never claimed that they did, I specifically wrote Catholics.
You are the one claiming that a Caliphate not recognized by the majority of the Islamic world was the Caliphate that united all Muslims.
348
posted on
10/29/2003 7:54:04 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Those who think they know, really piss off those of us who truly do.)
To: AAABEST
Well, you will discover that conservatives are really big on American-style justice wherein we judge each and every individual based on their own character apart from which ethnic group they happen to belong to. What you are advocating is
tribal justice, wherein if one individual harms another, then everyone in his tribe is guilty and can be punished by anyone in the tribe whose member was harmed.
Furthermore, to claim that a child is a "future murderer" and should therefore be preemptively executed, based upon some faint notion of divination, is really a sin against hope, as well as against justice.
To: rintense
It's not the responsiblity of the government to endorse or FINANCE religion. I extend that to this "faith based" nonsense. Unlike you I am NOT interested in having my tax dollars find muslims or any other religion.
I fund our church and other charities that we approve of. If you don't mind funding muslims who hate Jews and Christians, atleast that is what the Koran calls for, then more power to you.
350
posted on
10/29/2003 7:56:31 PM PST
by
nmh
To: Sir Gawain
They don't want Islamic law. That's why they left Pakistan for the freedom of America. Sorry, try again.
To: Luis Gonzalez
>> You are the one claiming that a Caliphate not recognized by the majority of the Islamic world was the Caliphate that united all Muslims.
Not my claim. Hell, the pope can't unite all catholics either, they practice birth control and commit abortions.. And as the clergy keeps raping kids his influence diminishes. Similar to the caliphate.
The official title of caliph was held by the Turkish sultans starting with Selim the first, and that practice was ended when the monarchy and the caliphate were abolished in Turkey in 1924. Whether or not and to what extent said calips influenced whom and during what period of time could be a topic of discussions for multiple doctoral papers..
352
posted on
10/29/2003 7:59:09 PM PST
by
a_Turk
(Nothing's good that uses bad...)
To: dennisw
Again, sorry, but the Muslims I know aren't making it a point to kill infidels, or to even remotely condone it, as I'm sure many here would love to believe. They do believe in peace, and are trying very hard to distance themselves from the militants.
To: AAABEST
I suggest you right yourself as well, triple A. The will to take a life, no matter how many, in the name of any religion is wrong. And I *am* making sense. Because if what you and many others here say is true about all of Islam, this entire country would be at war with every single Muslim living here in the United States. Now, you may believe that day is coming in the US. I don't.
To: nmh
Now you're bringing up something entirely different. I also fund many organizations. And yeah, there are many government programs I hate funding with my tax dollars. All I can do to change that is to make my voice heard through my congressmen, and continue to be a loud voice for change. So what are *YOU* going to do about your displeasure over the faith-based initiative? Continue hating? Well have fun with that.
To: rintense
Well said. People flock here from all over the world in order to leave the age-old hatreds and strifes of the Old Country and pursue their right to pursue happiness, and it's not just ethnic, racial, religious, or national. It could be as simple as which village you were born into. We don't have to tell them about freedom. They know what freedoms they enjoy here.
To: Cultural Jihad
Exactly. They wouldn't have it any other way.
To: nmh
Unlike you I am NOT interested in having my tax dollars find muslims or any other religion. Then you might be interested in this:
Your Taxes for PLO Propaganda
358
posted on
10/29/2003 10:03:57 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: a_Turk; Mo1
Here's an old story that seems to be appropriate here:
================================
How Hot Is It In Hell?
A thermodynamics professor had written a take home exam for his graduate students. It had one question:
"Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)? Support your answer with a proof." Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools off when it expands and heats up when it is compressed) or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:
'First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So, we need to know the rate that souls are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and all souls go to Hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand as souls are added. This gives two possibilities:
#1 If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.
#2 Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Ms. Therese Banyan during my Freshman year, "That it will be a cold night in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I will NEVER have any sexual relations with her, then #2 cannot be true, and so Hell is exothermic. '"
The student got the only A.
To: viaveritasvita
"I really really hated to see pictures of this PC celebration of Ramalamadingdong in the White House -- it made me sick to my stomach." Do you believe Bush is burning precious bridges of support within the Christian community for the sake of trying to gain the favor of Islam?
360
posted on
10/30/2003 1:52:47 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(Nurture terrorism in a neighborhood near you - donate to your local community mosque.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 441-443 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson