BUSH HOSTED RAMADAN DINNER AAT WHITE HOUSE (Mired in controversy)

Yahoo ^ | 10/28/2003 | Staff

[Sir Gawain]

Hey AAA, no need to use "harsh" words. Just point to their actions. How many freepers would run up to these innocent little children and try to give them a hug? I would shoot first and be sad about it later.

[JesseHousman]

Western colonists killed millions of the native inhabitants...

From where do you get your figures and history?

I guess only so much valuable information can be printed on the backs of cereal boxes.

[Sir Gawain]

As with all religions, including catholics .. there are some that take it a bit to far and over the edge

Sorry, no moral equivalence between radical Muslims and radical Christians. Try again.

[JesseHousman]

Read European history at the time of the Inquisiton. Where were Jews safer and more comfortable, the Islamic Ottoman Empire or Catholic Spain?At the risk of repeating myself I again say, much has happened in the past 600 years. Now find me a Jew (or a Christian) that can say how comfortable it is to coexist with muslim killers.

[Dane]

And you Sir Gawain as a big Libertarian supporter on FR would have no problem letting the people pictured in your reply #261 into the US, following the no borders platform of the Libertarian Party.

Am I correct or not?

[Sir Gawain]

Am I correct or not?

Are you ever correct?

Pssst, I'm not a Libertarian.

[Belial]

It's truly amazing how much things can change in 600 years. Nowadays Jews AND Christians suffer because of muslims.

So essentially you've abandoned your prior argument about the experience of the Jews in Spanish history, and catapulted into generalizations about contemporary events.

Maybe you should stick to trading Pokemon decks.

[Mo1]

Sorry, no moral equivalence between radical Muslims and radical Christians. Try again.

Did I say there was a moral equivalence??

I thought I was pointing out that there are nuts in all religions .. some take it further then others

Kind if like when the Germans murdered 6 millions jews

In todays world .. it those that are in the Islamic faith

[Dane]

Are you ever correct?

Well you could try to answer my reply #265 with an answer and not try to do a lame imitation of the Chesire cat, by answering a question with a question.

Pssst, I'm not a Libertarian.

Huh, with your previous history on FR, you are quite symapthetic to Liberatarian causes, IMO(i.e the main Libertarian cause on FR, drug validation and nary a word about welfare reform).

[Sir Gawain]

Did I say there was a moral equivalence??

Your comment seemed to infer that. If that's not the case, then I apologize.

[Sir Gawain]

Huh, with your previous history on FR, you are quite symapthetic to Liberatarian causes

What does this thread have to do with Libertarian causes? Anyway, you must be mistaken if you think I've argued for open borders.

[Mo1]

No biggy

[Darlin']

MinuteGal, I am heartened by your well-thought and well-stated post, as well as those from several others on this thread. Two years into our war on terror I'm amazed that a few people continue to misunderestimate President Bush. Perhaps they should ask Osama, Mullah Omer, Uday, Qusay, Saddam, et al, if they too think George W Bush is an Islamic sympathizer. I'm so grateful that so many "get it".

[Dane]

What does this thread have to do with Libertarian causes? Anyway, you must be mistaken if you think I've argued for open borders

Uh dude, open borders is a bedrock Libertarian "principle". Harry Browne(Libertarian candidate for President in 96 and 00) made that one of his(excuse the pun) highest priorities.

Are you going to now disavow Harry Browne since Harry Browne has no problem with the people you pictured in your reply #261 into the US unimpededed?

I will be waiting for your pretzel like answer.(This could be good, your subsequent answer, the Howard Dean people will probably use it, IMO).

[Sir Gawain]

Are you going to now disavow Harry Browne since Harry Browne has no problem with the people you pictured in your reply #261 into the US unimpededed?

Disavow Harry Browne? I'm not even a Libertarian. Wouldn't I have to endorse his ideas before I disavow them? You make no sense.

[Sir Gawain]

IOW, find any comments by me supporting open borders. That might help prop up your strawman.

[Dane]

Disavow Harry Browne? I'm not even a Libertarian. Wouldn't I have to endorse his ideas before I disavow them? You make no sense

Yeah right, page 23 of the Libertarian handbook, when a Libertarian is in trouble, play dumb.

Hey if you want to play dumb, that's your right as an American, but it also my right as an American not to go along with your gag.

[Dane]

IOW, find any comments by me supporting open borders. That might help prop up your strawman

Uh, dude, I wasn't the one who set up the strawman, that's your department.

[Sir Gawain]

Yeah right, page 23 of the Libertarian handbook, when a Libertarian is in trouble, play dumb.

Nice little theory, except for the small fact that I've never been a Libertarian, I've never been registered with the Libertarian Party, I've never stated on FR or anywhere else that I was a Libertarian, and I've never once made a post arguing for open borders.

[Dane]

Nice little theory, except for the small fact that I've never been a Libertarian, I've never been registered with the Libertarian Party, I've never stated on FR or anywhere else that I was a Libertarian, and I've never once made a post arguing for open borders

Uh what about the equal Holy Grail of Libertarians on FR, drug validation.

Like I said before it is your right to play this gag, but I do not have to go along with it.