Skip to comments.
[Top 100] US Advertisers Urged to Preview Ronald Reagan Movie Before Sponsoring
Cybercast News Service ^
| October 28, 2003
| Scott Hogenson
Posted on 10/28/2003 5:07:43 PM PST by hutton
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: AMNZ
I want Babs and Brolin to have to eat it.I think they have been "eating it" since 1992.
21
posted on
10/28/2003 6:23:42 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
To: holyscroller
Target doesn't allow ANY kind of initiative on its property. They are there strictly to sell merchandise: Expect More. Pay Less.
They have no interest in politicizing ANYTHING. They do, however, bend over backwards when it comes to family matters - in a big way. They encourage wives/husband/children lunch visits. They force their employees to use their manners. They enforce NO cursing, NO indecency, NO un-professional behavior. Vigorously.
I know this - I know Target political structure. They suffer NO politics under their roof which might interfere with sales - as they do attempt to make a profit.
22
posted on
10/28/2003 6:30:16 PM PST
by
txhurl
('The Reagans' Sponsors: Pull any ads you have NOW. This includes YOU, TARGET.)
To: Paul Atreides
I'll give you they are full of it, but I want them to eat the cost of this production.
If this gets aired, I want see "Clinton" done from our perspective to air immediately following the DNC convention. I would love to cast it, and I'll bet we could get the NRA to sponsor.
23
posted on
10/28/2003 6:53:58 PM PST
by
AMNZ
To: hutton
I was wondering if someone could get a list of sponsors already signed on for this show. If so, probably at least a temporary boycott should be done.
To: hutton
Recommending the Top 100 advertisers review the mini-drive by series of Reagan just might put it in a black hole which is where it belongs. Big advertisers definitely shy away from controversial shows.
25
posted on
10/28/2003 8:15:44 PM PST
by
Chu Gary
To: Chu Gary
I will never buy another product of a company that would willingly sponsor such trash.
26
posted on
10/29/2003 3:14:27 AM PST
by
hutton
To: Valentine_W
Please see 'KEYWORDS' right under the text of the post for the
potential sponsors. They will be dropping like flies soon, so don't pass judgment until you see the actual ads that accompany the travesty.
Thank you.
27
posted on
10/29/2003 6:15:17 PM PST
by
txhurl
('The Reagans' Sponsors: Pull any ads you have NOW. This includes YOU, TARGET.)
To: txflake
Great. Is there a good generic letter that is being passed around yet?
To: Paul Atreides
Les, do the words "Unfair and Slanted" mean anything to you?
To: Valentine_W
There are a couple boycott sites. Search 'CBS' 'REAGANS' 'BOYCOTT' etc.
We want to wait to eviscerate sponsors until we view their ads at broadcast, remembering that they need some time to realize what their flat-liner media buyers just got them into.. and cancel their ads.
30
posted on
10/29/2003 7:03:50 PM PST
by
txhurl
('The Reagans' Sponsors: Pull any ads you have NOW. This includes YOU, TARGET.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson