What Are They Smoking

NRO ^ | 10/28/2003 | Deroy Murdock

[jmc813]

Huh, could you please point out where I have praised the "Robert Wood Johnson Foundation" on FR?

Point out where I've praised George Soros.

[jmc813]

The gun reference of course makes it clear what the real agenda of these statists is, which is why the Second Amendment supporters and the anti-WOsD people should be staunch allies.

I've never seen that quote before. Can't say I'm surprised though. :-(

[jmc813]

The quote in #39 is another reason why so many people link drug warriors with gun-grabbers.

[Dane]

Chance designed it, so direct your comments towards him. I personally think it's kewl

On my computer your reply #6, chances name does not show on the ping line.

Anyway, the logo you(jmc813) used in your reply #6, screams tin foil paranoia, IMO.

[Dane]

Point out where I've praised George Soros

You Jeff(jmc813) personally have not, but Wolfie(#1 pro-potter on FR, IMO) has posted many articles on FR from George Soros supported organizations, such as the organization mentioned in this obscure NR article, The MPP(Marijuana Policy Project).

Interesting that NR doesn't mention that MPP gets some funding from George Soros.

[jmc813]

On my computer your reply #6, chances name does not show on the ping line.

It should have showed up on your computer. Are there chemtrails in your area? Or black helicopters perhaps? Or maybe it was the Jooooooooooos.

[Wolfie]

...but Wolfie(#1 pro-potter on FR, IMO)

I'm flattered. Pick up your copy of Forbes this week?

[Hemingway's Ghost]

Instead, he said, "The real issue is should we legalize marijuana." He added, "Let's have a debate about that."

Go ahead, right here on FR.

Please, any Drug Warrior who's actually interested in debating policy, not merely talking about having a rational debate on policy: explain how supporting the War on Drugs squares with the conservative principles of individual rights, individual liberties, and a smaller, less intrusive government.

[jmc813]

Interesting that NR doesn't mention that MPP gets some funding from George Soros.

Would you find it necessary for an anti-drug article quoting the ONDCP to reveal that they receive funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation?

[F.J. Mitchell]

Rationality was the first casualty in the WOD.

[Dane]

I'm flattered. Pick up your copy of Forbes this week?

No I haven't. Haven't had a subscription to Forbes magazine for many years.

Feel all warm and fuzzy that a pro-pot article was printed in Forbes?

Forbes Magazine also printed many an article praising Clinton economic policies.

I.E notice I said articles and not editorial. Why are you being so coy? Was your nirvana like article in Forbes an article or a editorial.

Anyway, I don't run my life by what is printed in a magazine as you seem to do, IMO.

Your(Wolfie's) magazine of choice to run Wolfie's life, IMO, High Times.

[robertpaulsen]

Looks like this guy:

From Traffic no less.

[Wolfie]

The title said it all: Inside Dope: The Unstoppable Economics of a Booming Business

Drew quite a few raised eyebrows sitting in the reception area of our offices. Even included some grow tips!

[robertpaulsen]

Well, obscure it may be, but it cannot compete with the recent MrLeRoy posting of a drug (of course) article from a student college newspaper that required a subscription. Had to have a circulation of what, 25?

I hereby submit that as the "obscure" benchmark by which we judge all others.

[F.J. Mitchell]

It seems that too often we are seeing people called pro-drug, when in reality they are anti-WOD.

[Dane]

Drew quite a few raised eyebrows sitting in the reception area of our offices. Even included some grow tips!

Uh so it was an article and not an editorial. Why can't you be truthful just once and not use the "I did not inhale" Clinonian language in your crusade for the "wonderweed".

[Dane]

It seems that too often we are seeing people called pro-drug, when in reality they are anti-WOD

It also seems that we are seeing people called pro-abortion, when in reality they are anti-life.

See, I can play your little semantic games also.

[lodwick]

bttt

[robertpaulsen]

He could very easily have said guns. He didn't. He said silencers.

Which, undoubtedly, you feel to be the centerpiece of any gun collection. Right next to the grenade launcher (hey, what better tool to keep the government in check?).

[jmc813]

Which, undoubtedly, you feel to be the centerpiece of any gun collection. Right next to the grenade launcher (hey, what better tool to keep the government in check?).

Now you're atarting to sound like a Bradyite.