Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEFAMATION -- LIBEL AND SLANDER; (Becareful what you say about the Clintons)
Florida Bar Association ^ | 10/24/03 | dubyaismypresident

Posted on 10/24/2003 11:50:45 AM PDT by NeoCaveman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: dubyaismypresident
'Course, if you are sued, your attorneys get to hold depositions with them (the clintons) and you can pursue any line of questioning you want.

AND, if you're a public figure, it's harder to prove.

Bring it on Billary!

41 posted on 10/24/2003 1:12:22 PM PDT by theDentist (Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
Thanks for getting it.
42 posted on 10/24/2003 1:12:52 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (demonstrating absurdity with absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Cool can I post that over here.

Sure. It says right on the bottom of this page we're posting only opinions. Opinions aren't liable under this law. I think.....I feel......In my opinion.....will not hold up in court. None of these are represented as fact.

43 posted on 10/24/2003 1:12:53 PM PDT by concerned about politics ( Have you donated to the Salvation Army? Liberals HATE Christian organizations! Tax deductable, too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; Chancellor Palpatine
The Clintons are public personages under the Sullivan vs. New York Times Rule.

Michael Schiavo may or may not be a public personage.

There, does that clear things up for you?

44 posted on 10/24/2003 1:13:09 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Michael Schiavo may or may not be a public personage.

Seems like a fairly public guy now.

45 posted on 10/24/2003 1:14:50 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (demonstrating absurdity with absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; Poohbah
How about...
Kobe Bryant?
Scott Peterson?
Monica Lewinski?

Public personalities? If yes, please explain the differences between them and Michael Schiavo?
46 posted on 10/24/2003 1:17:21 PM PDT by lonevoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice; dubyaismypresident
yes. there is none. : )
47 posted on 10/24/2003 1:18:11 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
I'm scared. I've been thinking, thinking, thinking about the lawyer George Felos, reading his words, reading his desires to kill sick and wounded people with legal hocus pocus, reading his own stories about his talks with God. I was just getting a grip on this interesting personality -- half Dr. Death, half Governor Moonbeam. He could sit on a street corner in Berkeley wearing black underwear, a purple bunny head with big floppy ears and Birkenstocks, and everybody would say nice things to him and drop coins in his cup. But now we are threatened with lawsuits and can't share our opinions and careful observations. So I won't tell you what I think of him.
48 posted on 10/24/2003 1:21:39 PM PDT by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
>> DEFAMATION -- LIBEL AND SLANDER

That was my old law firm.

49 posted on 10/24/2003 1:24:14 PM PDT by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
So I won't tell you what I think of him.

LOL.

My old lawfirm was Dewey Cheatem and Howe.

50 posted on 10/24/2003 1:25:28 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (demonstrating absurdity with absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
Public personalities? If yes, please explain the differences between them and Michael Schiavo?

Kobe Bryant: Public personality by virtue of voluntarily playing professional basketball.

Scott Peterson: probably a private person. If he goes off to Oblivion Island after this is over (assuming he isn't convicted), then he's a private person.

Monica Lewinsky: if she had made every reasonable effort to go away, she'd be a private person, but since she hasn't, she's a public person.

Michael Schiavo: same criteria as Scott Peterson, but he isn't even indicted yet, so he's probably got a better claim to private status.

51 posted on 10/24/2003 1:26:56 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
As you see them. You are entitled to your opinion. As is everyone else.
52 posted on 10/24/2003 1:31:52 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (demonstrating absurdity with absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Scott Peterson: probably a private person. If he goes off to Oblivion Island after this is over (assuming he isn't convicted), then he's a private person.

If so, then we should see the same dire legal warnings being posted re: statements made on this forum about Scott Peterson?

Monica Lewinsky: if she had made every reasonable effort to go away, she'd be a private person, but since she hasn't, she's a public person.

Then, if it's proven that George Felos is writing a book about his involvement with Terri Schiavo, wouldn't it likewise be so that he's not "made every reasonable effort to go away"? If it's proven that Michael Schiavo is helping him to write such a book and will make profit from it too, how about his lack of every reasonable effort to go away?

53 posted on 10/24/2003 1:39:50 PM PDT by lonevoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
Then, if it's proven that George Felos is writing a book about his involvement with Terri Schiavo, wouldn't it likewise be so that he's not "made every reasonable effort to go away"?

George Felos is not Michael Schiavo. Attorneys have a harder time claiming private personage because they're involved in the legal system on a constant and ongoing basis.

If it's proven that Michael Schiavo is helping him to write such a book and will make profit from it too, how about his lack of every reasonable effort to go away?

If, if, if.

If he isn't, then Felos is going to get very wealthy off of (a) collecting judgements from overly-passionate and underly-thinking FReepers, and (b) from writing a book about how he sued a gazillion FReepers.

54 posted on 10/24/2003 1:42:07 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
Scott Peterson: probably a private person. If he goes off to Oblivion Island after this is over (assuming he isn't convicted), then he's a private person.
If so, then we should see the same dire legal warnings being posted re: statements made on this forum about Scott Peterson?

That would have required consistency.

55 posted on 10/24/2003 1:45:08 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (demonstrating absurdity with absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
If so, then we should see the same dire legal warnings being posted re: statements made on this forum about Scott Peterson?

Depends. What's being said about him?

56 posted on 10/24/2003 2:02:07 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Depends. What's being said about him?

That he's a murder. That's what many a poster has said.

57 posted on 10/24/2003 2:49:33 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (demonstrating absurdity with absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
I will. Felos is a murderous freak.

Or a releaser of tormented souls, depending on your point of view. My personal point of view is that he has converted his desire to kill people into a money making business.

58 posted on 10/24/2003 2:54:57 PM PDT by palmer (They've reinserted my posting tube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Everything that I say about the former occupant of the White House, who held the title of President of the United States, is true, or reported by the press as a reasonably true public controversy.

We live in the United States.

A person can sue his neighbor because the neighbors dog only poops green poop, not black like normal dogs. (you can sue anybody for anything in this great land).

In other words, if you say what you believe to be the truth, - somebody may sue you, but they will have to pay your attorney's fees after they lose. They will also likely suffer a civil lawsuit in their vein attempt to conceal the truth.

It doesn't depend on any definition of the word "is", or any other commonly used English word used to decribe a psychopathic congenital liar (diagnosed by licensed psychiatric professionals), "democrat progressive" chinese communist sympathetic and treasous behavior, rape enabling, who displays pedophilic tendancies (48 yr old man admitted a tryst with a 20 yr old intern), impeached former President who lost his bar card in his home state, and is no longer is entrusted with attorney/client relationships.

To anybody who wants to sue me - bring it on. I could use the extra cash.

59 posted on 10/24/2003 3:53:35 PM PDT by PokeyJoe (Don't talk about my armchair unless you know how to pull the recliner lever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
No...but for the life of me, why didn't the National Enquirer follow up on THIS???????

GENNIFER FLOWERS RATS OUT BILL CLINTON ON HANNITY & COLMES

I think we should FREEP the National Enquirer and ask them why they can attempt to "out" Matt Lauer and get away with it, and Rush, yet they don't go after the story behind this?????

David Kendall will probably print the emails and use them for employee T-paper!

60 posted on 10/24/2003 3:55:00 PM PDT by soozla (I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson